Tedizolid (Sivextro) for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Tedizolid is administered as 200 mg once daily for 6 days, available in both oral and intravenous formulations, and represents a highly effective first-line option for treating ABSSSI caused by Gram-positive organisms including MRSA. 1
Approved Indications and Dosing
Standard Dosing Regimen:
- 200 mg once daily for exactly 6 days for patients 12 years and older 1
- Available as both oral tablets (taken with or without food) and IV infusion 1
- IV formulation requires 1-hour infusion time 1
- No dose adjustment needed when switching between IV and oral routes 1
Approved Pathogens:
- Staphylococcus aureus (both MRSA and MSSA) 1
- Streptococcus pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and Streptococcus anginosus Group 1
- Enterococcus faecalis 1
Clinical Context and Positioning
Tedizolid receives the highest level recommendation (1A) from international guidelines for both oral and IV treatment of MRSA skin and soft tissue infections. 2 This places it on equal footing with linezolid and daptomycin as a preferred agent.
When to Use Tedizolid:
- Moderate to severe purulent or nonpurulent SSTIs requiring MRSA coverage 3
- Purulent SSTIs with systemic signs (fever, tachycardia, elevated WBC) where MRSA is suspected or confirmed 3
- Severe nonpurulent cellulitis/erysipelas in patients who failed oral antibiotics, have systemic signs, are immunocompromised, or show signs of deeper infection 3
- As an alternative to vancomycin or linezolid for hospitalized patients, with advantages of once-daily dosing and shorter treatment duration 3
Comparative Efficacy
Tedizolid demonstrates non-inferior efficacy to linezolid but with a shorter treatment course (6 days vs 10 days) and once-daily dosing (vs twice-daily). 3, 4
Key Clinical Trial Results:
- Early clinical response rates at 48-72 hours: 79.5% for tedizolid vs 79.4% for linezolid 4
- Post-therapy success rates: 85.5% for tedizolid vs 86.0% for linezolid 4
- Similar efficacy across infection types: cellulitis/erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, and wound infections 5
- Comparable outcomes for lower-extremity vs non-lower-extremity infections 6
- MRSA microbiological response: 95.2% for tedizolid vs 94% for linezolid 5
Safety and Tolerability Advantages
Tedizolid demonstrates a superior safety profile compared to linezolid, particularly regarding gastrointestinal effects and hematologic toxicity. 5, 7
Specific Advantages:
- Lower incidence of nausea and vomiting compared to linezolid 5
- Reduced risk of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia due to shorter treatment duration and less bone marrow suppression 5, 7
- Weaker MAO inhibitor activity than linezolid, suggesting fewer drug-drug interactions with SSRIs and MAOIs 8, 7
- No dosage adjustment required for any degree of renal or hepatic dysfunction 7
Practical Administration Details
IV Preparation (Critical Steps):
- Reconstitute 200 mg vial with 4 mL Sterile Water for Injection 1
- Gently swirl to dissolve; avoid vigorous shaking to minimize foaming 1
- Further dilute in 250 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection only 1
- Do NOT use solutions containing divalent cations (Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺) such as Lactated Ringer's or Hartmann's Solution 1
- Total time from reconstitution to administration must not exceed 24 hours 1
- Administer as IV infusion only—never as IV push or bolus 1
Missed Dose Management:
- Take missed dose if more than 8 hours remain before next scheduled dose 1
- If less than 8 hours remain, skip and wait for next scheduled dose 1
Treatment Duration Considerations
The standard 6-day course of tedizolid is sufficient for most ABSSSI cases, though guidelines suggest 7-14 days for MRSA SSTIs should be individualized based on clinical response. 2 The discrepancy reflects that tedizolid's FDA approval is specifically for 6 days 1, while broader SSTI guidelines account for various agents and infection severities. For tedizolid specifically, the 6-day regimen has proven non-inferior to 10 days of linezolid 4.
Key Clinical Advantages
Four-to-eightfold greater in vitro potency against staphylococci, enterococci, and streptococci compared to linezolid, including drug-resistant phenotypes 7
High oral bioavailability (approximately 90%) enables seamless transition from IV to oral therapy without dose adjustment 7
Activity against certain linezolid-resistant strains harboring the cfr gene (in absence of specific ribosomal mutations) 7