Is a testicular width of 1.4 cm normal given a length of 3.6 cm?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is a Testicular Width of 1.4 cm Normal?

Yes, a width of 1.4 cm is likely incorrect and represents a measurement error—this dimension is far too narrow for a testicle with a length of 3.6 cm and falls well outside normal anatomical proportions.

Normal Testicular Dimensions and Proportions

Using established anatomical relationships, a testicle measuring 3.6 cm in length should have:

  • Width of approximately 2.5-3.0 cm 1
  • Height/depth of approximately 2.0-2.5 cm 1

Your reported width of 1.4 cm is less than half of what would be expected for a 3.6 cm length testicle, making this measurement highly suspect 1.

Why This Matters Clinically

Normal adult testicular dimensions are 3.5-5 cm in length, corresponding to volumes typically greater than 12-14 mL 2. Your length of 3.6 cm falls within the normal range 2. However, if the width were truly only 1.4 cm, the calculated volume would be severely reduced and potentially pathological 3, 2.

Volume Calculations Reveal the Problem

Using the ellipsoid formula with your measurements (3.6 cm × 1.4 cm × assumed depth), the volume would be abnormally small—likely under 4-5 mL 4. This would be:

  • Far below the 12 mL threshold that defines testicular atrophy 3, 2
  • Associated with impaired spermatogenesis and increased cancer risk 3, 5

Common Measurement Pitfalls

External measurements with calipers systematically overestimate dimensions by including scrotal skin and epididymis 4, 6:

  • Caliper measurements overestimate length by approximately 5.7 mm 6
  • Width is overestimated by approximately 1.4 mm 6
  • Thickness is overestimated by approximately 2.9 mm 6

The width measurement is particularly prone to error because:

  • The epididymis sits along the testicular border and can be mistakenly excluded 6
  • Scrotal skin thickness varies and affects external measurements 4
  • Proper positioning and consistent measurement technique are critical 7

What You Should Do

If you measured this yourself with a ruler or caliper, remeasure the width carefully, ensuring you're capturing the widest point of the testis itself 6. The Prader orchidometer provides more reliable volume estimates than external measurements, though it tends to overestimate by including scrotal tissue 3, 2.

If a healthcare provider obtained these measurements, request clarification or ultrasound confirmation 3, 2. Ultrasound is the gold standard for accurate testicular volume determination and eliminates measurement errors from scrotal skin and epididymal tissue 4, 6.

When Ultrasound Is Indicated

Ultrasound should be obtained if 3, 2:

  • Size discrepancy between testes exceeds 2 mL or 20% 3
  • Concern for testicular atrophy (volume <12 mL) 3, 2
  • History of cryptorchidism, infertility concerns, or age under 30-40 years 3
  • Any palpable mass, firmness, or pain 1

Bottom Line

A 1.4 cm width is anatomically implausible for a 3.6 cm length testicle—expect the true width to be approximately 2.5-3.0 cm 1. Remeasure carefully or obtain ultrasound for accurate volume determination if clinical concerns exist 3, 2, 4.

References

Guideline

Testicular Size and Function Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Testicular Size and Volume Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Testicular Size and Volume Measurement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.