How is an underbite (malocclusion) corrected?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Underbite (Class III Malocclusion)

Underbite correction depends critically on skeletal maturity: growing children benefit most from facemask therapy to advance the upper jaw, while skeletally mature patients with severe deformity require orthognathic surgery combined with orthodontics. 1

Treatment Approach by Age and Severity

Growing Children and Adolescents (≤16 years)

Facemask therapy is the primary treatment for skeletal Class III malocclusion in growing patients, showing significant improvement in jaw relationships. 1

  • Facemask treatment produces a mean improvement of 4.10 mm in overjet (95% CI 3.04 to 5.16) compared to no treatment, with benefits maintained at 3-year follow-up. 1

  • Angular jaw relationship (ANB) improves by 3.93° (95% CI 3.46 to 4.39) with facemask therapy, indicating substantial correction of the skeletal discrepancy between upper and lower jaws. 1

  • Chin cup therapy also demonstrates statistically significant improvement in ANB and Wits appraisal (another measure of jaw relationship) in growing patients. 1

  • Treatment timing is critical: earlier intervention during active growth phases yields optimal results, as the appliances work by redirecting jaw growth rather than moving already-formed bone. 1

Skeletally Mature Patients (Post-Growth)

Orthognathic surgery combined with orthodontics is indicated for adults and post-growth adolescents with moderate-to-severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. 2, 3

Surgical Options Based on Severity:

  • Mandibular setback surgery alone (Obwegeser/Dal Pont procedure) for primarily mandibular excess, with a relapse rate of 21%. 3

  • Bimaxillary surgery (Le Fort I maxillary advancement + mandibular setback) for combined maxillary deficiency and mandibular excess, with a relapse rate of 24%. 3

  • Maxillary advancement procedures show superior stability with lower relapse rates (21%) compared to mandibular procedures (27%), making them preferable when both options are viable. 3

Critical Surgical Considerations:

  • Relapse correlates positively with the magnitude of mandibular setback: larger movements have higher relapse risk, requiring careful surgical planning. 3

  • Orthodontic preparation is essential: pre-surgical orthodontics aligns the dental arches, and post-surgical orthodontics refines the occlusion. 3, 4

  • Skeletal maturity must be confirmed before surgery to prevent growth-related relapse. 2

Treatment Algorithm for Dentofacial Deformity

Mild-to-Moderate Deformity in Growing Patients:

  1. Initiate dentofacial orthopedic appliances (facemask or chin cup) early when deformity is first detected to maximize growth modification potential. 2, 1

  2. Combine with anti-inflammatory therapy if temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement is present, as this can affect mandibular growth. 2

  3. Monitor with serial cephalometric radiographs to assess treatment response and growth patterns. 2

Severe Deformity or Skeletally Mature Patients:

  1. Confirm quiescent/controlled TMJ status before surgical intervention, as active inflammation increases surgical complications. 2

  2. Complete pre-surgical orthodontics to decompensate dental positions and prepare arches for surgical repositioning. 3, 4

  3. Select surgical approach based on:

    • Maxillary advancement preferred when feasible due to superior stability. 3
    • Bimaxillary surgery for combined skeletal discrepancies. 3
    • Consider distraction osteogenesis in severe cases or when traditional orthognathic surgery is contraindicated. 2
  4. Post-surgical orthodontic refinement for 6-12 months to optimize occlusion. 3

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

  • Do not delay treatment in growing patients: early intervention with growth modification appliances is most effective, and waiting until skeletal maturity necessitates surgery. 1

  • Avoid underestimating relapse potential: mandibular setback distances >6-8 mm have significantly higher relapse rates, requiring consideration of alternative approaches or overcorrection. 3

  • Ensure proper occlusal assessment post-treatment: verify that posterior teeth fully interdigitate and that the patient can achieve proper bite closure without interference. 5

  • Do not perform orthognathic surgery with active TMJ arthritis: this significantly increases complications and relapse risk; optimize inflammatory control first. 2

  • Account for missing teeth in treatment planning: implant placement or prosthetic reconstruction may be needed before or after orthodontic/surgical correction to establish proper occlusion. 6, 4

Monitoring and Long-Term Stability

  • All patients require long-term retention following active treatment, as relapse can occur years after treatment completion. 3

  • Monitor for TMJ complications, particularly in surgical cases, as joint dysfunction can develop post-operatively. 2

  • Serial cephalometric evaluation at 6-month to 1-year intervals during the first 2-3 years post-treatment helps detect early relapse. 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Evaluation of relapse after orthodontic therapy combined with orthognathic surgery in the treatment of skeletal class III.

Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2013

Research

Treatment of a unilateral Class II crossbite malocclusion with traumatic loss of a maxillary central incisor and a lateral incisor.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 2006

Guideline

Management of Dental Trauma Following Motor Vehicle Accidents

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.