What are the major Framingham criteria for diagnosing congestive heart failure (CHF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Major Framingham Criteria for Congestive Heart Failure

The major Framingham criteria for diagnosing CHF include seven clinical findings: orthopnea, jugular venous distension, hepatojugular reflux, pulmonary rales, S3 gallop rhythm, acute pulmonary edema, and cardiomegaly. 1

Diagnostic Requirements

To diagnose heart failure using Framingham criteria, you must identify either 2 or more major criteria OR 1 major criterion plus 2 minor criteria. 1 While clinicians rarely use these strict criteria in modern practice, they remain valuable as a reference framework for recognizing the constellation of heart failure signs. 1

The Seven Major Criteria

  • Orthopnea: Difficulty breathing when lying flat, requiring the patient to sleep propped up with pillows 1
  • Jugular venous distension (JVD): Elevated jugular venous pressure visible on physical examination 1
  • Hepatojugular reflux: Increased jugular venous pressure when applying pressure to the abdomen 1
  • Pulmonary rales (crackles): Crackling sounds heard on lung auscultation, indicating pulmonary congestion 1
  • S3 gallop rhythm: Third heart sound heard on cardiac auscultation, indicating ventricular dysfunction 1
  • Acute pulmonary edema: Severe fluid accumulation in the lungs causing respiratory distress 1
  • Cardiomegaly: Enlarged heart visible on chest X-ray 1

Minor Framingham Criteria (For Context)

Minor criteria include dyspnea on exertion, nocturnal cough, ankle edema, tachycardia (heart rate >120 bpm), hepatomegaly, and pleural effusion. 1 These support the diagnosis when combined with at least one major criterion.

Clinical Performance and Limitations

The Framingham criteria demonstrate excellent sensitivity (96.4%) but poor specificity for systolic heart failure, meaning their absence effectively rules out the diagnosis, but their presence does not confirm it due to high false-positive rates. 2, 3 In acute HFpEF presentations, the most prevalent findings are dyspnea on exertion (90%) and pulmonary rales (71%), though these may not persist at follow-up (70% and 13% respectively). 4

Jugular venous distension at acute presentation predicts persistent HFpEF at follow-up (OR 1.80,95% CI 1.13-2.87), while pleural effusion and tachycardia may yield false-positive diagnoses. 4

Modern Diagnostic Approach

Contemporary guidelines emphasize that Framingham criteria should not be used in isolation—the Universal Definition of Heart Failure requires symptoms/signs PLUS either elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP >35 pg/mL ambulatory, >100 pg/mL hospitalized; NT-proBNP >125 pg/mL ambulatory, >300 pg/mL hospitalized) OR objective evidence of cardiogenic congestion. 1 Echocardiography remains essential to confirm cardiac structural/functional abnormalities and determine ejection fraction. 1, 5

A completely normal ECG makes heart failure unlikely (<10% probability), providing valuable negative predictive value. 1, 5 The displaced cardiac apex, third heart sound, and chest X-ray findings of venous congestion or interstitial edema are the most useful physical findings for identifying heart failure. 3

Critical Pitfalls

Do not diagnose heart failure based solely on Framingham criteria without objective cardiac testing—approximately 75% of patients meeting acute Framingham criteria for HFpEF no longer meet these criteria at ambulatory follow-up. 4 This highlights the risk of overdiagnosis when relying exclusively on clinical criteria, particularly in the setting of acute decompensation where transient findings may mimic heart failure. 4

In obese patients and the elderly, clinical signs become particularly difficult to interpret, making objective testing with natriuretic peptides and echocardiography even more critical. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Diagnosis and evaluation of heart failure.

American family physician, 2012

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria for Heart Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.