What are the recent World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antenatal care?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recent WHO Guidelines on Antenatal Care

The World Health Organization recommends a minimum of 8 antenatal care contacts throughout pregnancy, with midwife-led continuity of care, representing a significant shift from the previous 4-visit model. 1, 2

Core WHO Recommendations for Visit Frequency

The 2016 WHO guidelines fundamentally changed the approach to antenatal care delivery:

  • Minimum of 8 ANC contacts are recommended for all pregnant women to achieve a positive pregnancy experience 1, 2, 3
  • First contact should occur within the first trimester (before 12 weeks gestation), as timely initiation is a major driving force toward achieving adequate total visits 3, 4
  • Women with timely first-trimester ANC initiation have 4.7 times higher odds of receiving eight contacts 3

This represents a doubling of the previous 4-visit recommendation, though implementation remains challenging globally with only 13-23% of women in low- and middle-income countries currently achieving 8+ contacts 4, 5

Health System Interventions Recommended by WHO

The WHO guidelines emphasize several structural changes to improve antenatal care quality and access:

  • Midwife-led continuity of care throughout antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal periods 1, 2
  • Women-held case notes to improve communication and patient engagement 1
  • Community mobilization to improve communication and support to pregnant women 1
  • Task-shifting components of prenatal care to community-based health workers to improve access, particularly in low-resource settings 1
  • Recruitment and retention of health workers in rural and remote areas where access to essential health services is limited 1

Essential Content of Antenatal Contacts

WHO guidelines specify that antenatal care must deliver comprehensive services beyond simple monitoring:

Education Topics (all 6 recommended):

  • Nutrition and appropriate weight gain 1, 6
  • Exercise during pregnancy 1, 6
  • Preparation for labor and delivery 1, 6
  • Breastfeeding 1, 6
  • Family planning 1, 6

Psychosocial Screening and Management (all 7 areas):

  • Tobacco use screening and cessation support 1, 6
  • Alcohol use assessment 1, 6
  • Substance use evaluation 1, 6
  • Intimate partner violence screening 1, 6
  • Mental health disorders 1, 6
  • Housing insecurity 1, 6
  • Nutritional needs assessment 1, 6

Preventive Interventions

The WHO guidelines include specific evidence-based interventions to prevent adverse outcomes:

  • Low-dose aspirin (100-150 mg daily) starting before 16 weeks gestation for women with major risk factors (prior preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, BMI >30, chronic kidney disease, antiphospholipid syndrome) or ≥2 minor risk factors 1, 2
  • Calcium supplementation (1200 mg daily) if dietary calcium intake is low in the local population 1, 2
  • Multiple micronutrient supplementation for pregnant women 7
  • Malaria prevention in endemic areas 7
  • Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria 7
  • Syphilis screening and treatment 7

These eight proven preventive interventions, if fully implemented, could prevent 5.2 million small vulnerable newborn births and 0.566 million stillbirths annually in low- and middle-income countries 7

Implementation Challenges and Solutions

A critical pitfall is that women in low- and middle-income countries typically do not seek care until after 20 weeks gestation, missing the crucial window for aspirin and calcium prophylaxis before 16 weeks. 1

Key barriers to achieving 8+ contacts include:

  • Poor knowledge of prophylactic interventions among healthcare providers, even doctors, in district health centers 1
  • Limited supply and distribution of essential medications like magnesium sulfate for eclampsia prevention 1
  • Women's limited comprehension of preeclampsia risks and the importance of regular monitoring 1
  • Socioeconomic factors: women who fail to achieve 8+ contacts are typically poor, single, with low education, living in rural areas, with higher parity and shorter birth intervals 3

Comparison with Other International Guidelines

While WHO recommends 8 contacts, implementation varies globally:

  • France and Netherlands: 7.5 visits median 1
  • United Kingdom: 9 visits 1
  • Sweden: 10 visits 1
  • Canada: 11.5 visits 1
  • United States (ACOG): 12-14 visits traditionally, though reduced schedules endorsed since 2020 1, 6
  • Japan: 15 visits 1

Meta-analysis of over 5,000 patients demonstrated equivalent maternal and neonatal outcomes when visits were reduced from 12-14 to 9 visits for low-risk patients, supporting the WHO's evidence-based approach 1, 6

Evidence for Combined Interventions

Combined interventions (two or more) show stronger effects than single interventions on key outcomes:

  • Improved ANC coverage of at least one visit (OR 1.79,95% CI 1.47-2.17) 8
  • Reduced perinatal mortality (OR 0.74,95% CI 0.57-0.95) 8
  • Reduced low birthweight (OR 0.61,95% CI 0.46-0.80) 8
  • Improved tetanus protection coverage (OR 1.48,95% CI 1.18-1.87) 8

Single interventions show only marginal improvements in achieving 4+ visits (OR 1.11,95% CI 1.01-1.22) with no effect on pregnancy-related deaths or perinatal mortality 8

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to identify high-risk women early (before 16 weeks) who would benefit from aspirin prophylaxis for preeclampsia prevention 1, 2
  • Inadequate supply chain management for essential medications like magnesium sulfate, which often remains stuck at district level rather than reaching healthcare facilities 1
  • Insufficient patient education about disease risks, particularly for preeclampsia, leading to poor acceptance of treatment and follow-up 1
  • Not distinguishing between low-risk and high-risk pregnancies when determining visit frequency and content 6
  • Overlooking socioeconomic barriers that prevent women from attending recommended contacts, particularly transportation, work conflicts, and childcare needs 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.