What is not true about medication management in heart failure: A) Furosemide (Lasix) does not decrease mortality, B) Spironolactone (Aldactone) decreases mortality by 30-35% as shown in the RALES study, C) Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i) significantly decrease mortality, or D) maximizing the dose of Beta-Blockers (BB) is recommended in patients over 70 years old?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What is NOT True About Medication Management in Heart Failure

The statement that is NOT true is Option D: maximizing the dose of beta-blockers in patients over 70 years old is NOT universally recommended—rather, elderly patients should be titrated carefully to target heart rate (55-64 bpm) or tolerated doses, not necessarily maximum doses. 1, 2, 3

Analysis of Each Statement

A) Furosemide Does Not Decrease Mortality - TRUE Statement

  • Loop diuretics like furosemide are used for symptomatic relief of congestion but have no proven mortality benefit 4
  • Diuretics are first-line for relieving volume overload but do not prevent disease progression 4
  • This statement is factually correct

B) Spironolactone Decreases Mortality by 30-35% in RALES - TRUE Statement

  • The RALES trial demonstrated that low-dose spironolactone (12.5-50 mg daily) reduced mortality by 30-34% in NYHA class III-IV heart failure patients 4, 5
  • This benefit was consistent when added to ACE inhibitor and diuretic therapy 4, 5
  • The FDA label confirms this 30% mortality reduction (p<0.001) 5
  • This statement is factually correct (the 35% cited in the question is within the range of reported benefits)

C) ACE Inhibitors Significantly Decrease Mortality - TRUE Statement

  • ACE inhibitors are cornerstone therapy with proven mortality benefit in heart failure 4, 1
  • They reduce mortality across all stages of heart failure and are recommended as standard therapy 4
  • This statement is factually correct

D) Maximize Beta-Blocker Dose in Patients Over 70 Years - FALSE Statement

This is the incorrect statement for several critical reasons:

Evidence Against Dose Maximization in Elderly

  • Target heart rate, not maximum dose, is the appropriate goal in elderly heart failure patients 3
  • The CIBIS-ELD trial specifically demonstrated that achieved heart rate after titration (55-64 bpm), not the beta-blocker dose itself, predicted mortality in elderly patients 3
  • Achieved beta-blocker dose was NOT associated with mortality risk in elderly patients 3

Appropriate Approach in Elderly Patients

  • Start low and titrate slowly: Initial dose should be as low as possible (1.25 mg/day for bisoprolol), with dose increases longer than 15 days if necessary 2
  • The objective is to reach the target dose if tolerated, but this must be done progressively with careful monitoring 2
  • In the SENIORS trial of patients ≥70 years, the mean maintenance dose achieved was only 7.7 mg of nebivolol (target 10 mg), yet significant benefit was still demonstrated 6

Age-Specific Considerations

  • Adverse effects may be both more frequent and more serious in elderly patients, requiring strict adherence to titration protocols 2
  • Age alone should not preclude beta-blocker use, but elderly patients require more cautious titration 4, 1
  • The evidence shows elderly patients gain similar benefit to younger patients, but maximizing dose is not the goal—achieving optimal heart rate control is 4, 2, 3

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

Common Error: Assuming higher doses always equal better outcomes in elderly patients. The evidence clearly shows that in patients over 70, heart rate control (55-64 bpm) is more predictive of mortality benefit than achieving maximum labeled doses 3

Practical Approach: Titrate beta-blockers slowly in elderly heart failure patients, monitoring for symptomatic hypotension, bradycardia, and heart failure decompensation, with the goal of achieving a resting heart rate of 55-64 bpm rather than a specific maximum dose 2, 3

Related Questions

What will not significantly affect the management of an elderly man with shortness of breath and heart failure symptoms: changing atenolol (beta-blocker) 50 mg to bisoprolol (beta-blocker) 6 mg, increasing frusemide (furosemide, loop diuretic) to twice daily, increasing ramipril (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) to 5 mg, or adding dapagliflozin (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor) 10 mg?
What is the next best treatment plan for a 90-year-old female with an ejection fraction (EF) of 48% by Biplane Method of Discs, grade II diastolic dysfunction, moderate mitral valve regurgitation, moderate tricuspid valve regurgitation, and moderate pulmonary hypertension?
What is the indication of an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level?
Is metoprolol (beta blocker) causing nightmares in a patient taking 47.5mg of metoprolol succinate (controlled release) and can it be substituted with bisoprolol (beta blocker)?
What is the appropriate management for an 88-year-old patient with stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) exacerbation, who presents with increased fatigue, Shortness of Breath (SOB), and weight gain after discharge on torsemide (Generic name: torsemide), a loop diuretic?
Do we give the maximum dose of beta-blockers (BB) in patients older than seventy with heart failure?
What can falsely elevate an alcohol level?
What is the management of Stage C heart failure?
Is digoxin (digitalis) a good alternative for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (p afib) when a patient is hypotensive?
What is RNAi (Ribonucleic Acid interference) technology used for?
What is the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class for Stage C heart failure?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.