Is a peak systolic pulmonary pressure of 47 mmHg consistent with pulmonary hypertension?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Peak Systolic Pulmonary Pressure of 47 mmHg and Pulmonary Hypertension

A peak systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP) of 47 mmHg is consistent with pulmonary hypertension and warrants further evaluation with right heart catheterization before any treatment decisions are made. 1

Understanding the Measurement

The PASP of 47 mmHg you're referring to is likely an estimated value from echocardiography derived from the tricuspid regurgitation velocity using the modified Bernoulli equation (PASP = 4v² + RAP). 2 This measurement is equivalent to right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) in the absence of pulmonic stenosis or right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. 2

Interpreting the Echocardiographic Probability

According to the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines, the echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension should be based primarily on the tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) rather than the estimated PASP itself. 1 Here's how to interpret your finding:

  • A PASP of 47 mmHg corresponds to a TRV of approximately 3.2-3.3 m/s (assuming normal right atrial pressure of 5 mmHg)
  • This TRV falls in the 2.9-3.4 m/s range, which indicates intermediate to high probability of PH depending on the presence of additional echocardiographic signs 1, 2
  • If other echo signs of PH are present (RV enlargement, RV dysfunction, RA enlargement, flattened interventricular septum, dilated pulmonary artery), this represents high probability of PH 1, 2

Clinical Significance and Risk

This pressure elevation is clinically significant:

  • PASP >30 mmHg is outside the normal range and represents an important risk marker 2
  • PASP >40 mmHg warrants further evaluation for pulmonary hypertension in patients with unexplained dyspnea 2
  • Elevated PASP in this range is associated with 25-40% five-year mortality 1

Critical Next Steps

Echocardiography alone is insufficient to confirm pulmonary hypertension and initiate treatment. 1, 3 The following algorithmic approach is recommended:

1. Assess Additional Echocardiographic Signs

Look for these specific findings that reinforce the diagnosis: 1, 2

  • Right ventricular enlargement or dysfunction
  • Right atrial enlargement
  • Interventricular septal flattening
  • Dilated main pulmonary artery (>25 mm)
  • Decreased tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE <1.6 cm) 2

2. Determine Clinical Context

Evaluate for symptoms and risk factors: 1

  • Symptomatic patients (dyspnea, fatigue, syncope, chest pain) with high or intermediate probability require right heart catheterization
  • Identify potential underlying causes (connective tissue disease, congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, thromboembolic disease, left heart disease)

3. Right Heart Catheterization

This is mandatory before treatment initiation to: 3

  • Confirm mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg (note: newer definitions use >20 mmHg) 1, 4, 5
  • Measure pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP ≤15 mmHg defines pre-capillary PH) 1, 3
  • Calculate pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR >3 Wood Units confirms pulmonary arterial hypertension) 1, 3
  • Distinguish passive PH from intrinsic pulmonary vascular disease 3

4. Additional Diagnostic Testing

Complete the workup with: 3

  • Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan to exclude chronic thromboembolic PH (sensitivity >90%, specificity >94%)
  • Pulmonary function tests with DLCO to evaluate for underlying lung disease
  • Blood tests including BNP/NT-proBNP for prognostic information 6

Important Caveats

Measurement Limitations

  • Echocardiography may underestimate PASP by a mean of 11 mmHg, with underestimation of 20 mmHg in up to 31% of patients 2
  • In severe tricuspid regurgitation, TRV may be significantly underestimated and cannot exclude PH 1, 2
  • TR jets are analyzable in only 39-86% of patients 2
  • If the TR signal is weak, consider enhancement with agitated saline or microbubble contrast 2

Technical Considerations

  • Ensure the Doppler beam is aligned parallel to the TR jet 2
  • Use multiple transducer positions to record the highest velocity 2
  • Measure pressures over 2-3 respiratory cycles at end-exhalation for consistency 7

Do Not Rely Solely on PASP

The ESC/ERS guidelines explicitly recommend using TRV rather than estimated PASP as the main variable because of inaccuracies in right atrial pressure estimation and amplification of measurement errors. 1 Always integrate multiple echocardiographic parameters and clinical context. 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Assessing Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension using RVSP on 2D Echo

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pulmonary hypertension.

Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2024

Research

Definition, classification and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension.

The European respiratory journal, 2024

Research

Diagnostics in pulmonary hypertension.

Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society, 2007

Guideline

Normal Variation in Blood Pressure with Respiration

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.