What is the preferred treatment for renal calculus, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PCNL vs RIRS for Renal Calculus

Direct Answer

For renal stones >20mm, PCNL should be offered as first-line therapy due to superior stone-free rates and fewer secondary interventions, while RIRS is preferred for stones ≤20mm given comparable efficacy with lower morbidity. 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on Stone Size

Stones ≤20mm

  • RIRS or SWL are appropriate first-line options, with RIRS providing higher stone-free rates (90% vs 72% for ESWL). 1
  • For lower pole stones 10-20mm specifically, median success rates are: RIRS/URS (81%) vs PCNL (87%), making either option reasonable. 1
  • RIRS offers the advantage of lower morbidity in this size range. 1

Stones >20mm

  • PCNL achieves stone-free rates of 87-94% compared to 75-81% for RIRS in this size range. 1
  • For stones 2.3cm (23mm), PCNL provides a 94% stone-free rate compared to 75% with RIRS in randomized trials. 2
  • PCNL requires fewer secondary interventions: 153 fewer per 1000 patients compared to RIRS (absolute difference 15.3%). 3

Comparative Outcomes Analysis

Stone-Free Rates

  • PCNL improves stone-free rates by 10% absolute difference (RR 1.13,95% CI 1.08-1.18) compared to RIRS. 3
  • This advantage is most pronounced for stones >20mm where PCNL's success is less dependent on stone composition, density, and location. 2

Safety Profile

  • PCNL and RIRS have equivalent major complication rates (RR 0.86,95% CI 0.59-1.25). 3
  • PCNL has higher overall complications (RR 1.51,95% CI 1.24-1.83), specifically Clavien-Dindo grade 2 complications. 4
  • No difference exists in ureteral stricture rates between the two approaches (RR 0.93,95% CI 0.39-2.21). 3

Secondary Interventions

  • PCNL reduces need for secondary interventions by 15.3% absolute difference (RR 0.31,95% CI 0.17-0.55). 3
  • Only 26% of RIRS patients require a second procedure when staged RIRS is planned. 4
  • When RIRS is repeated up to two times if needed, stone-free rates become equivalent to single-stage PCNL. 4

Hospital Stay

  • PCNL extends hospital stay by 1.04 days compared to RIRS (95% CI 0.27-1.81 days). 3
  • This represents a clinically meaningful difference exceeding the predefined threshold of one day. 3

Special Considerations and Contraindications

PCNL Contraindications

  • Anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy that cannot be discontinued. 1
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (absolute contraindication). 1
  • Pregnancy. 1

RIRS Relative Contraindications

  • Untreated urinary tract infection (relative contraindication). 1

Urgent Situations

  • For obstructing stones with suspected infection, urgent drainage via stent or nephrostomy tube is mandatory before definitive treatment with either modality. 1, 2

Technical Considerations

PCNL Technique

  • Flexible nephroscopy should be routine during PCNL to access fragments in areas inaccessible by rigid nephroscope. 1
  • Normal saline irrigation must be used to prevent electrolyte abnormalities and hemolysis. 1
  • Nephrostomy tube placement after uncomplicated PCNL is optional. 1

RIRS Technique

  • Ho:YAG laser is the gold standard for lithotripsy, with thulium fiber laser offering comparable efficacy. 1
  • Routine post-procedure stenting is unnecessary after uncomplicated RIRS and may increase morbidity. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not offer SWL as first-line therapy for stones >20mm due to unacceptably low success rates (10% for stones >20mm). 1
  • Do not perform single-stage RIRS for stones >20mm without counseling patients about the likely need for staged procedures. 4
  • Avoid proceeding with definitive stone treatment in the presence of infection without first achieving drainage and antibiotic control. 1, 2

Clinical Decision Framework

For stones ≤20mm: Choose RIRS for shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity, accepting slightly lower single-procedure stone-free rates. 1, 3

For stones >20mm: Choose PCNL for superior stone-free rates and fewer secondary interventions, accepting longer hospital stay. 1, 2, 3

For stones >20mm in patients who cannot tolerate longer hospitalization or have PCNL contraindications: Staged RIRS (up to two procedures) achieves equivalent stone-free rates to PCNL. 4

References

Guideline

Treatment of Lower Pole Kidney Stone Causing Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of 2.3cm Nephrolithiasis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.