Are white blood cells (WBCs) normal in the urine of menstruating women?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

White Blood Cells in Urine During Menstruation

White blood cells in urine are NOT a normal finding in menstruating women and should prompt evaluation for urinary tract infection or other pathology, though menstrual contamination can cause false-positive results.

Understanding Normal WBC Thresholds in Urine

The presence of WBCs in urine (pyuria) indicates inflammation or infection of the urinary tract, regardless of menstrual status:

  • Uninfected urine typically contains ≤10 WBCs/mm³ (or ≤1,000 WBCs/mL) by hemocytometer 1
  • Manual microscopy shows ≥8 WBCs per high-power field as significant for bacteriuria 2
  • Automated microscopy identifies >2 WBCs/hpf as significant pyuria indicative of urinary tract inflammation 2
  • Infected urine regularly contains >10,000 WBCs/mL, with mean counts of 310,000 WBCs/mL in infected patients 1

The Menstrual Contamination Problem

While menstruation itself does not cause true pyuria, menstrual blood can contaminate urine specimens and create misleading results:

  • Menstrual discharge contains only 36% blood on average (range 1.6-81.7%), with the remainder being endometrial tissue fluid 3
  • Blood contains white blood cells that can appear in contaminated urine samples, creating false-positive pyuria 3
  • Elevated epithelial cell counts in urine are significantly associated with contaminated samples 4

Clinical Approach to WBCs in Urine During Menstruation

Step 1: Assess for Contamination

  • High epithelial cell counts suggest specimen contamination rather than true infection 4
  • If contamination is suspected, obtain a clean-catch midstream specimen or consider catheterization for accurate results 2

Step 2: Evaluate for Urinary Tract Infection

  • Pyuria (≥8-10 WBCs/hpf) is the best determinant of bacteriuria requiring therapy 2
  • In uncomplicated symptomatic UTI, positive nitrites and leukocyte esterase on dipstick can be treated without culture 2
  • The absence of pyuria provides strong evidence against urinary tract infection 1

Step 3: Consider Alternative Diagnoses if Symptomatic

If the patient has pelvic pain or abnormal vaginal discharge along with WBCs:

  • Evaluate for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) if there is uterine/adnexal tenderness or cervical motion tenderness 5, 6
  • WBCs on saline microscopy of vaginal secretions (not urine) support PID diagnosis 5, 6
  • Test for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis with nucleic acid amplification testing 5, 7

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not dismiss pyuria as "normal menstrual contamination" without proper evaluation. True pyuria indicates pathology and requires investigation for UTI or other urinary tract inflammation, even during menstruation 2, 1. If initial results are equivocal due to suspected contamination, repeat the urinalysis with a properly collected specimen rather than assuming the WBCs are menstrual in origin.

References

Research

Urinalysis and urinary tract infection: update for clinicians.

Infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology, 2001

Research

Blood and total fluid content of menstrual discharge.

Obstetrics and gynecology, 1985

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Vaginal Infections with Moderate Polymorphonuclear WBCs

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach and Treatment for Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.