What are the recommended diagnostic procedures and treatment options for a hiatal hernia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Approach to Hiatal Hernia

The biphasic esophagram (combining double-contrast and single-contrast barium studies) is the recommended initial diagnostic test for hiatal hernia, achieving 88% sensitivity and providing both anatomic and functional information about the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. 1

Primary Diagnostic Imaging

First-Line: Fluoroscopic Studies

  • Biphasic esophagram is superior to single imaging techniques, combining double-contrast views (optimizing detection of inflammatory conditions) with single-contrast views (optimizing detection of hiatal hernias and esophageal rings/strictures). 1
  • The double-contrast upper GI series alone achieves 80% sensitivity for detecting associated esophagitis and is particularly beneficial for evaluating structural and functional abnormalities of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. 1
  • Single-contrast esophagram may miss mucosal irregularities from reflux disease and should not be used as the sole imaging modality. 2
  • All patients being considered for antireflux surgery must undergo barium esophagogram according to the American College of Surgeons' Esophageal Diagnostic Advisory Panel. 1

When to Add Upper GI Series

  • For large hiatal hernias, include a complete upper GI series to fully evaluate the stomach anatomy and position. 1, 3
  • This provides critical information about esophageal length, presence of strictures, and gastroesophageal reflux. 2

Secondary Diagnostic Methods

CT Scanning: When and Why

  • CT scan is the gold standard for diagnosing complicated diaphragmatic hernias, with 87% specificity, and should be used when complications are suspected (volvulus, ischemia, strangulation). 1, 2
  • CT with IV contrast is superior for determining the presence, location, and size of diaphragmatic defects when chest X-ray findings are inconclusive but clinical suspicion remains high. 1
  • Key CT findings indicating complications include: absence of gastric wall contrast enhancement, intestinal wall thickening with target enhancement, diaphragmatic discontinuity, "collar sign," and "dependent viscera" sign. 2
  • Critical caveat: Normal chest radiographs occur in 11-62% of diaphragmatic hernias, so negative plain films do not exclude the diagnosis. 1, 2

Endoscopy: Role and Limitations

  • Endoscopy is essential for evaluating esophagitis erosiva, esophageal strictures, and differentiating other pathologies like eosinophilic esophagitis. 3
  • Endoscopy has higher sensitivity (67%) than high-resolution manometry (52%) for detecting hiatal hernias, but lower specificity (68% versus 95%). 4
  • Endoscopy produces more false positives (31.71%) compared to high-resolution manometry (4.88%). 4
  • Both endoscopy and manometry have high false-negative rates (45-48%), making negative results unreliable for ruling out hiatal hernia. 4

Manometry: Limited Diagnostic Value

  • Esophageal manometry has only 20% sensitivity for detecting hiatal hernias compared to endoscopy, though specificity is 99%. 5
  • High-resolution manometry (defining hiatal hernia as >2 cm separation between gastroesophageal junction and crural diaphragm) has better specificity than endoscopy but similar poor sensitivity. 4
  • Manometry does not provide diagnostic value as a primary test for hiatal hernia; its role is limited to assessing esophageal peristalsis in preoperative planning. 6

Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Initial Evaluation

  • Order biphasic esophagram/double-contrast upper GI series as the first imaging study for suspected hiatal hernia. 1, 3
  • Include complete upper GI series if a large hernia is suspected based on symptoms (significant dysphagia, early satiety, chest discomfort). 1, 3

Step 2: If Fluoroscopy is Inconclusive or Complications Suspected

  • Obtain CT chest and abdomen with IV contrast if clinical suspicion remains high despite negative or equivocal fluoroscopic studies. 1, 2
  • CT is mandatory if symptoms suggest complications: acute chest pain, vomiting suggesting volvulus, signs of gastric ischemia. 2

Step 3: Endoscopy for Treatment Planning

  • Perform upper endoscopy to evaluate for reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, strictures, and to rule out eosinophilic esophagitis. 3
  • Endoscopy is required before considering antireflux surgery to assess mucosal damage. 3

Step 4: Special Populations

  • In pregnant patients, use ultrasonography first, followed by MRI if necessary, to avoid radiation exposure. 2
  • In post-bariatric surgery patients with suspected internal hernia, contrast-enhanced CT with both oral and IV contrast is mandatory. 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not order CT as first-line imaging for uncomplicated hiatal hernia when fluoroscopic studies are more appropriate and informative. 2
  • Do not rely on chest X-ray alone—it misses 11-62% of diaphragmatic hernias. 1, 2
  • Do not use non-contrast CT when evaluating potential vascular complications or relationship to cardiac structures. 2
  • Do not assume a negative endoscopy or manometry rules out hiatal hernia—both have false-negative rates approaching 50%. 4
  • Do not skip barium esophagogram in patients being considered for antireflux surgery, regardless of other imaging findings. 1

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Imaging for Hiatus Hernia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Hernias

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de la Hernia Hiatal Sintomática

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnosis of Type-I hiatal hernia: a comparison of high-resolution manometry and endoscopy.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2013

Research

Identification of hiatal hernia by esophageal manometry: is it reliable?

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2005

Research

Esophageal hiatal hernia: risk, diagnosis and management.

Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.