Management of Ureteric Stones in a Young Adult with Hypertension
For this young adult with ureteric stones and severe hypertension (150/110 mmHg), immediate blood pressure control with ACE inhibitors or ARBs combined with calcium channel blockers is essential, while stone management depends on size: stones <10 mm warrant initial observation with alpha-blocker medical expulsive therapy, but stones >10 mm require ureteroscopy as first-line surgical intervention. 1, 2
Diagnosis and Initial Investigations
Imaging Studies
- Non-contrast CT scan is the gold standard for diagnosing ureteric stones, providing accurate stone size, location, and degree of obstruction 1
- Low-dose CT protocols should be used following ALARA principles to minimize radiation exposure, particularly important in young adults 3
- Ultrasound can assess for hydronephrosis but is inferior for determining exact stone size and location 2
Laboratory Workup
- Urinalysis is mandatory before any intervention to detect infection, which if present requires antibiotic therapy before stone manipulation to prevent urosepsis 3, 1
- Urine culture should be obtained if infection is suspected 3
- Serum creatinine and eGFR to assess renal function, especially critical given the hypertension 3
- In young adults diagnosed with hypertension before age 40, comprehensive screening for secondary hypertension causes is recommended 3
- Consider 24-hour urine collection for stone risk factors (calcium, oxalate, uric acid, citrate, pH) after acute episode resolves 3
Critical Assessment Points
- Verify well-controlled pain status 3, 1
- Rule out clinical signs of sepsis (fever, tachycardia, hypotension) 3, 1
- Confirm adequate renal functional reserve 3, 1
- Check for hydronephrosis severity on imaging 2
Management Based on Stone Size
Stones ≤10 mm
Initial conservative management with observation and medical expulsive therapy is appropriate 1, 2
- Alpha-blockers (tamsulosin) increase stone passage rates by 29% compared to placebo, with distal ureteral stones <10 mm achieving 77.3% stone-free rates versus 54.4% with placebo 1
- Maximum observation period is 6 weeks from initial presentation to prevent irreversible kidney injury 2
- NSAIDs are first-line analgesics for renal colic; opioids only if NSAIDs contraindicated or insufficient 1
- Periodic imaging (ultrasound or low-dose CT) to monitor stone position and hydronephrosis 3, 2
Indications for surgical intervention despite size <10 mm:
- Failure to pass stone after 6 weeks 2
- Uncontrolled pain despite adequate analgesia 1
- Progressive hydronephrosis 2
- Development of infection/sepsis 1
- Patient preference or inability to tolerate conservative management 3
Stones >10 mm
Surgical intervention is required as spontaneous passage is unlikely 1, 2
Ureteroscopy (URS) is first-line therapy:
- Stone-free rates: 95% for stones <10 mm, 78% for stones >10 mm 3
- Single-procedure success rate significantly higher than shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) 1
- Complication rates: stricture 1-4%, sepsis 2-4%, ureteral injury 3-6% 3, 1
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is an alternative:
- Stone-free rates: 87% for stones <10 mm, 73% for stones >10 mm 3
- Lower complication rates (8-10%) compared to URS 3
- May require multiple sessions 3
- Less effective for mid-ureteral stones due to poor visualization 3
Hypertension Management Considerations
Blood Pressure Control Strategy
This patient's BP of 150/110 mmHg requires immediate pharmacological intervention 3
- Target systolic BP: 120-129 mmHg if well tolerated 3
- Initial therapy: ACE inhibitor (lisinopril 10 mg daily) or ARB as first-line for young adults 3, 4
- If BP not controlled with single agent, add dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) 3
- Three-drug combination if needed: ACE inhibitor/ARB + calcium channel blocker + thiazide diuretic, preferably as single-pill combination 3
Critical Drug Considerations with Ureteric Stones
ACE inhibitors/ARBs are generally safe but require monitoring:
- Monitor renal function closely as these drugs can worsen acute kidney injury in obstructed kidneys 4
- If significant obstruction present, consider delaying ACE inhibitor initiation until stone is managed 4
- Hyperkalemia risk increases, particularly if renal function compromised 4
- Avoid NSAIDs for prolonged periods in patients on ACE inhibitors as combination increases acute kidney injury risk 4
Thiazide diuretics have dual benefit:
- Effective for BP control 3
- Reduce urinary calcium excretion, preventing recurrent calcium stone formation 3
- Particularly valuable for long-term stone prevention in hypertensive patients 3
Hypertension-Stone Disease Connection
- Hypertensive patients have 5.5-fold increased risk of stone formation compared to normotensives 5
- Hypertensives demonstrate higher urinary calcium (263 vs 199 mg/day in males), oxalate (34.8 vs 26.5 mg/day), and uric acid excretion 5
- 14.3% of hypertensive patients develop stones during 5-year follow-up versus 2.9% of normotensives 5
Surgical Timing and Technique Selection
When to Proceed Urgently to Surgery
- Infected obstructed kidney (pyonephrosis) requires emergency decompression within hours 3
- Bilateral obstruction or obstruction in solitary kidney 3
- Acute kidney injury with rising creatinine 4
- Intractable pain or vomiting despite medical management 1
Technique Selection Algorithm
For this young adult, ureteroscopy is preferred over SWL because:
- Higher single-procedure stone-free rates 1
- Better for mid-ureteral stones 3
- Allows direct visualization and stone analysis 3
- Young adults tolerate anesthesia well and benefit from definitive single-procedure treatment 3
SWL may be considered if:
- Stone <10 mm in proximal ureter 3
- Patient preference for less invasive approach 3
- Anatomical factors favor SWL 3
Special Consideration: Anticoagulation
If this patient requires future anticoagulation for any reason, URS remains first-line as it can be safely performed without interrupting anticoagulation, unlike SWL or percutaneous procedures 3
Post-Treatment Management
Immediate Post-Procedure
- Stent placement after URS is not routine but may be needed if significant ureteral trauma, residual fragments, or edema present 3
- Monitor for complications: fever (sepsis), hematuria, flank pain 3, 1
- Ensure adequate hydration 3
Long-Term Stone Prevention
Given the hypertension-stone connection, aggressive metabolic evaluation and prevention is warranted 5
Obtain 24-hour urine collection 6 months after stone episode to assess calcium, oxalate, uric acid, citrate, volume, and pH 3
Dietary modifications:
- Increase fluid intake to achieve urine output >2.5 L/day 3
- Limit sodium to <2300 mg/day (reduces both BP and urinary calcium) 3, 5
- Moderate animal protein intake (reduces uric acid and calcium excretion) 3, 5
- Maintain normal calcium intake (1000-1200 mg/day); restriction paradoxically increases stone risk 3
Pharmacological prevention based on stone composition:
Hypertension Long-Term Management
- Maintain BP-lowering therapy lifelong 3
- Annual monitoring of renal function given stone history 3, 4
- Annual 24-hour urine collection to assess adherence and metabolic response 3
- Consider weight management if BMI elevated, as obesity increases both hypertension and stone risk 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never perform blind basket extraction without endoscopic visualization - high risk of ureteral injury 3
- Do not use NSAIDs as sole long-term analgesic in patients on ACE inhibitors - increases acute kidney injury risk 4
- Avoid prolonged conservative management beyond 6 weeks - risks irreversible kidney damage 2
- Do not start ACE inhibitor if severe obstruction present - may precipitate acute kidney injury; relieve obstruction first 4
- Never ignore fever in stone patient - infected obstructed kidney is urological emergency requiring immediate decompression 3, 1
- Do not restrict dietary calcium - counterintuitively increases stone risk by increasing intestinal oxalate absorption 3
- Avoid combining two RAS blockers (ACE inhibitor + ARB) - not recommended for hypertension management 3