Is a dual chamber pacemaker (pacemaker) a contraindication to receiving a dental crown?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Dual Chamber Pacemaker and Dental Crown Placement

A dual chamber pacemaker is NOT a contraindication to receiving a dental crown. Dental crown procedures can be safely performed in patients with pacemakers, including dual chamber devices, with appropriate precautions regarding electromagnetic interference from certain dental equipment 1.

Key Safety Considerations

Equipment That Requires Precautions

The primary concern during dental procedures relates to electromagnetic interference from specific dental devices, not the crown procedure itself:

  • Electrosurgical units can inhibit pacemaker function up to 10 cm distance and require the most caution 2
  • Ultrasonic scalers may interfere with dual-chamber pacemaker sensing at distances of 17-23 cm from the generator or leads 3
  • Ultrasonic cleaning systems can affect dual-chamber pacemaker activity at 15-23 cm 3
  • Battery-operated composite curing lights may inhibit pacing activity at 2-10 cm from the device 3

Safe Dental Equipment

Most routine dental equipment poses no risk and can be used without restriction 2, 3:

  • High-speed and low-speed handpieces
  • Dental radiography units
  • Electric pulp testers
  • Amalgamators
  • Electric toothbrushes

Clinical Management Protocol

For Standard Crown Preparation

No special precautions are needed for basic crown preparation using standard handpieces and impression materials, as these do not generate electromagnetic interference 2, 4.

When Electrocautery Is Required

If electrosurgical equipment must be used during the procedure 1:

  • Use bipolar electrocautery systems preferentially over unipolar systems to minimize electromagnetic interference
  • Apply electrocautery in short bursts only, keeping power output to minimum required levels
  • Position the ground plate to complete the electrical circuit away from the pacemaker generator
  • Maintain physical distance between the electrocautery device and pacemaker

For Pacemaker-Dependent Patients

If the patient is pacemaker-dependent and significant electromagnetic interference is anticipated 1:

  • Consider reprogramming the device to asynchronous mode (VOO or DOO) before the procedure
  • Alternatively, place a magnet over the pacemaker during equipment use to activate asynchronous pacing
  • Ensure continuous ECG and pulse monitoring throughout the procedure

Post-Procedure Care

Pacemaker interrogation is generally not necessary after routine crown procedures unless 1:

  • The patient is pacemaker-dependent
  • Significant electrocautery was used
  • Any symptoms or concerns arose during the procedure

Evidence Quality and Practical Implications

A prospective clinical study of 32 patients (12 pacemakers, 20 ICDs) found that commonly used electrical dental devices did not cause clinically significant interference with sensing and pacing functions, though minor telemetry interference without clinical impact was noted with ultrasonic equipment 4. This represents the highest quality evidence available, demonstrating that modern dental procedures are safe for pacemaker patients when basic precautions are followed.

The bottom line: Crown placement itself poses no contraindication. The dentist should simply maintain awareness of which dental devices may cause electromagnetic interference and keep them at appropriate distances from the pacemaker generator and leads during use 2, 3, 4.

References

Guideline

Pacemaker Safety During Biopsy Procedures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Selective interference with pacemaker activity by electrical dental devices.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics, 1998

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.