AV Block vs PAC vs Wandering Pacemaker: Key Differences
Understanding the Distinctions
These are fundamentally different cardiac rhythm abnormalities that require completely different approaches—AV block represents a conduction system disease requiring pacemaker evaluation, PACs are benign ectopic beats rarely needing treatment, and wandering atrial pacemaker is typically a benign variant requiring no intervention.
AV Block: Conduction System Disease
Classification and Recognition
- First-degree AV block shows PR interval >200 ms and is generally benign unless PR ≥300 ms with symptoms resembling pacemaker syndrome 1
- Second-degree Type I (Wenckebach) demonstrates progressive PR prolongation before a dropped beat, typically occurring at the AV node level 1
- Second-degree Type II (Mobitz II) shows fixed PR intervals with sudden dropped beats, usually with wide QRS, indicating infranodal disease with high risk of progression 2, 1
- Third-degree (complete) AV block demonstrates complete absence of AV conduction with independent atrial and ventricular activity 1
Treatment Algorithm for AV Block
Immediate pacemaker implantation is indicated for:
- Third-degree or advanced second-degree AV block with symptomatic bradycardia, heart failure, or ventricular arrhythmias 2, 1
- Asymptomatic patients with documented asystole ≥3.0 seconds or escape rate <40 bpm while awake 2, 3
- Atrial fibrillation with bradycardia and pauses ≥5 seconds 2
- Type II second-degree block even without symptoms due to unpredictable progression to complete heart block 2, 3
Critical step before pacing: Always exclude reversible causes first 2:
- Electrolyte abnormalities (especially hyperkalemia)
- Drug toxicity (digitalis, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers)
- Lyme disease
- Sleep apnea (reversible with treatment) 2
- Perioperative hypothermia or inflammation 2
Proceed with pacing despite transient resolution in:
- Sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, or neuromuscular diseases (myotonic dystrophy, Kearns-Sayre syndrome) due to unpredictable progression 2, 3
Special Considerations for AV Block
- Exercise-induced AV block (not from ischemia) indicates His-Purkinje disease with poor prognosis and requires pacing 2, 3
- Type I block requires pacing only if symptomatic or if electrophysiology study shows intra-His or infra-His location 2, 3
- First-degree AV block with PR ≥300 ms causing pacemaker-like symptoms (fatigue, dyspnea from loss of AV synchrony) is a Class IIa indication for pacing 1, 3
Premature Atrial Contractions (PACs): Benign Ectopic Beats
PACs are early atrial depolarizations originating outside the sinus node and generally require no treatment. They appear as early P waves with different morphology from sinus P waves, followed by normal or aberrantly conducted QRS complexes.
Management Approach for PACs
- No intervention needed for asymptomatic patients—PACs are benign findings in healthy individuals
- Lifestyle modifications if symptomatic: reduce caffeine, alcohol, stress, ensure adequate sleep
- Beta-blockers may be considered only if PACs are highly symptomatic and affecting quality of life
- Distinguish from AV block: PACs show early P waves with conducted beats (unless blocked), while AV block shows normal P wave timing with conduction failure
Key Pitfall
- Do not confuse blocked PACs with second-degree AV block—blocked PACs have early P waves that fail to conduct because they hit the AV node during its refractory period, not due to conduction system disease
Wandering Atrial Pacemaker: Benign Rhythm Variant
Wandering atrial pacemaker represents shifting of the dominant pacemaker site between the sinus node and other atrial foci, producing at least three different P wave morphologies with varying PR intervals.
Recognition Features
- At least 3 different P wave morphologies in the same lead
- Varying PR intervals (all >120 ms, distinguishing from accelerated junctional rhythm)
- Heart rate typically 60-100 bpm (if >100 bpm, termed multifocal atrial tachycardia)
- Commonly seen in athletes, elderly patients, or those with increased vagal tone
Management of Wandering Pacemaker
- No treatment required in asymptomatic patients—this is a benign variant 2
- Evaluate for underlying conditions only if symptomatic: COPD, heart disease, electrolyte abnormalities
- Do not implant pacemaker for wandering atrial pacemaker alone—this is not a conduction system disease
Critical Diagnostic Algorithm
Step 1: Identify P wave timing and morphology
- Early P waves with different morphology = PACs
- Multiple P wave morphologies with varying PR intervals = Wandering pacemaker
- Normal P wave timing with conduction failure = AV block
Step 2: For suspected AV block, determine degree and type
- PR >200 ms with all conducted = First-degree
- Progressive PR prolongation before dropped beat = Type I second-degree
- Fixed PR with sudden dropped beats = Type II second-degree
- No AV relationship = Third-degree
Step 3: Assess for reversible causes before pacing decision 2, 3
Step 4: Apply pacing indications based on symptoms and high-risk features 2, 1, 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not pace wandering atrial pacemaker—this is not AV block and represents normal variation in pacemaker site 2
- Do not confuse blocked PACs with Type II AV block—look for early P wave timing in blocked PACs
- Do not delay pacing for Type II block waiting for symptoms—progression is unpredictable and sudden 2, 3
- Do not implant pacemaker for AV block during sleep apnea without symptoms—these are reversible 2
- Remember that complete AV block can have intact retrograde VA conduction—this can cause endless loop tachycardia after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation, requiring appropriate device programming 4