Treatment of Spinal Stenosis
For symptomatic spinal stenosis, begin with at least 6 weeks of aggressive conservative management including physical therapy, activity modification, and patient education; if symptoms persist or worsen, surgical decompression is indicated, with fusion added only when spondylolisthesis or instability is present. 1
Initial Conservative Management (First-Line Treatment)
All patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis should initially receive conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks before considering surgery. 1, 2 The majority of patients either improve or remain stable with nonoperative management, and rapid deterioration is unlikely. 3
Recommended Conservative Therapies
Multimodal nonpharmacological care is the cornerstone of initial treatment, combining patient education, lifestyle modifications, behavioral change techniques, home exercise programs, manual therapy, and supervised rehabilitation. 2
Physical therapy with core strengthening exercises that incorporate individual tailoring, supervision, stretching, and strengthening is specifically recommended. 1 Patients should remain active rather than undergo bed rest, as activity is more effective for symptom management. 1
Epidural steroid injections are recommended for radiculopathy and produce equivalent improvements regardless of stenosis severity, representing the highest evidence level for conservative treatment. 1
Pharmacological options may include a trial of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants for neuropathic pain. 2
Medications NOT Recommended
- Avoid NSAIDs, acetaminophen, opioids, muscle relaxants, pregabalin, gabapentin, methylcobalamin, and calcitonin for lumbar spinal stenosis, as these have insufficient evidence or demonstrated lack of efficacy. 2
Indications for Surgical Intervention
Surgery should be considered when conservative management fails after 6 weeks, or immediately if severe/progressive neurologic deficits or cauda equina syndrome are present. 1
Absolute Indications for Immediate Surgery
- Severe or progressive neurologic deficits 1
- Suspected cauda equina syndrome 1
- Suspected vertebral infection or cancer with impending cord compression 1
Relative Indications After Failed Conservative Management
- Persistent neurogenic claudication affecting quality of life 1
- Radiculopathy with functional limitations 1
- Significant pain and disability despite optimal conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks 1
Surgical Treatment Algorithm
For Stenosis WITHOUT Spondylolisthesis or Instability
Decompression alone (laminectomy/laminotomy) is the recommended surgical treatment. 1, 3 Decompression is associated with good or excellent outcomes in approximately 80% of patients. 3
Critical surgical principle: Preserve the facet joints and pars interarticularis during decompression to avoid iatrogenic instability. 3 Too little decompression is a more frequent mistake than too much, and postlaminectomy instability is uncommon. 3
For Stenosis WITH Spondylolisthesis
Decompression with fusion is strongly recommended for stenosis associated with degenerative spondylolisthesis. 4, 1 This represents a Grade B recommendation based on large prospective studies including the SPORT trial. 4
Surgical decompression and fusion demonstrates superior outcomes in all clinical measures for at least 4 years compared to nonoperative management, with 93-96% of patients reporting excellent/good results versus 44% with decompression alone. 1
Posterolateral fusion following decompression is the standard approach. 1
Pedicle screw fixation should be added in cases with kyphosis or evidence of instability on dynamic flexion-extension imaging. 1
Surgical Technique Selection
There is insufficient evidence to recommend a standard fusion technique. 4 The optimal surgical strategy should be individualized based on:
- Patient's unique anatomical constraints 4
- Surgeon's experience 4
- Presence of deformity or instability 3
Diagnostic Imaging for Surgical Candidates
MRI is the preferred initial imaging modality because it provides superior visualization of soft tissue, vertebral marrow, and spinal canal without ionizing radiation. 1
Upright radiographs with flexion-extension views are essential to identify segmental motion and instability. 1
CT myelography can be useful when MRI is contraindicated or to better assess bony anatomy. 1
Expected Outcomes and Prognosis
Approximately 97% of patients experience some recovery of symptoms after appropriate surgical intervention for symptomatic stenosis. 1
Decompression with fusion has better outcomes than decompression alone in patients with spondylolisthesis, with statistically significant improvements in back pain (p=0.01) and leg pain (p=0.002). 1
Severity of stenosis does not impact response to conservative treatment. 5 Patients with severe stenosis respond as well to exercise-based rehabilitation as those with mild or moderate stenosis, challenging the assumption that severe cases should bypass conservative management. 5
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not perform routine imaging in patients without red flags or radiculopathy, as it does not improve outcomes and increases costs. 1
Do not recommend bed rest—remaining active is more effective. 1
Do not add fusion to decompression in the absence of spondylolisthesis, instability, or deformity, as fusion does not improve outcomes for isolated stenosis and increases complication rates. 3
Do not perform inadequate decompression in an attempt to preserve stability—too little decompression is more problematic than too much. 3
Potential Surgical Complications
Surgical complications may include nerve root injury, dural tear, infection, failure of fusion, or hardware complications. 1
Fusion procedures carry higher complication rates (18-40%) compared to decompression alone (7-12%). 1
Regular radiographic assessment is necessary to evaluate fusion status and monitor for adjacent segment disease in long-term follow-up. 1