What are the treatment options for non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA): Essential Information

What is nr-axSpA?

Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints that shares all clinical features with ankylosing spondylitis but lacks the advanced joint damage visible on X-rays. 1

  • Nr-axSpA and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are now understood as two stages of the same disease spectrum called axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) 1, 2
  • The key distinguishing feature is the absence of radiographic sacroiliitis—advanced sacroiliac joint damage and spine ankylosis are not present 1
  • Despite lacking X-ray changes, nr-axSpA causes similar levels of pain, stiffness, disease activity, and quality of life impairment as AS 3
  • Approximately 10% of nr-axSpA patients will develop radiographic changes within 2 years, and this may exceed 80% after 20+ years 3

Clinical Features You Should Know

  • Inflammatory back pain is the cardinal symptom: pain that improves with exercise, worsens with rest, and is particularly severe in the morning 4
  • Morning stiffness of the spine with prolonged duration is typical 4
  • 90-95% of patients are HLA-B27 positive 1, 4
  • The disease can be accompanied by uveitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease 1
  • Diagnostic delay averages 5-7 years between first symptoms and diagnosis 4

Disease Burden and Prognosis

  • Nr-axSpA imposes substantial physical and social burdens, interfering with work ability and schooling 1
  • The severity of pain, stiffness, and limited flexibility varies widely among patients and over time 1
  • While many patients manage well with conservative treatment, a minority experiences severe disabling symptoms requiring aggressive therapy 3

Treatment Algorithm

First-Line Treatment (Active Disease)

NSAIDs are strongly recommended as first-line pharmacological treatment and should be used continuously rather than on-demand for active disease. 1

  • NSAIDs are highly effective against the major symptoms (pain and stiffness) and may have disease-modifying properties 2, 5
  • Continuous NSAID use is conditionally recommended over on-demand use for active disease 1
  • No particular NSAID is preferred over another 1
  • Physical therapy is strongly recommended and should always be combined with pharmacological treatment 1
  • Active physical therapy interventions (supervised exercise) are preferred over passive interventions (massage, ultrasound, heat) 1

Second-Line Treatment (Inadequate Response to NSAIDs)

TNF inhibitors are strongly recommended as the first biologic choice for active nr-axSpA despite NSAID treatment. 1

  • This recommendation is based on high-quality evidence 1
  • No particular TNF inhibitor is preferred over another 1
  • TNF inhibitors are conditionally recommended over IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) as first-line biologic therapy 1
  • TNF inhibitors are conditionally recommended over tofacitinib 1

Alternative Biologics

IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) are conditionally recommended for active nr-axSpA despite NSAIDs, but are second-choice after TNF inhibitors. 1

  • Secukinumab or ixekizumab are preferred over tofacitinib 1
  • When TNF inhibitors are contraindicated, secukinumab or ixekizumab are conditionally recommended over sulfasalazine, methotrexate, or tofacitinib 1

Treatment Failure Algorithm

If the first TNF inhibitor fails due to primary non-response (never worked), switch to secukinumab or ixekizumab rather than trying a second TNF inhibitor. 1

  • If the first TNF inhibitor fails due to secondary non-response (worked initially then stopped), switch to a different TNF inhibitor rather than a non-TNF biologic 1
  • Do not switch to the biosimilar of the first TNF inhibitor if that TNF inhibitor failed—this is strongly recommended against 1

What NOT to Do (Common Pitfalls)

Do not add methotrexate or sulfasalazine to TNF inhibitor therapy—this combination is conditionally recommended against in favor of switching to a different biologic 1

  • Systemic glucocorticoids are strongly recommended against for axial symptoms 1
  • Sulfasalazine, methotrexate, and tofacitinib are only conditionally recommended over no treatment for active nr-axSpA despite NSAIDs, and only when biologics are not appropriate 1
  • Sulfasalazine is recommended only for persistent peripheral arthritis when TNF inhibitors are contraindicated 1

Stable Disease Management

For patients with stable nr-axSpA, use on-demand NSAIDs rather than continuous treatment. 1

  • Do not discontinue or taper biologics in patients with stable disease—this is conditionally recommended against 1, 6
  • If receiving both TNF inhibitor and NSAIDs, continue TNF inhibitor alone rather than both medications 1
  • If receiving both TNF inhibitor and a conventional synthetic antirheumatic drug, continue TNF inhibitor alone 1

Local Injection Therapy

  • For isolated active sacroiliitis despite NSAIDs, local glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended 1
  • For active enthesitis despite NSAIDs, locally administered parenteral glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended, but avoid peri-tendon injections of Achilles, patellar, and quadriceps tendons 1
  • For active peripheral arthritis despite NSAIDs, locally administered parenteral glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended 1

Imaging Considerations

MRI of the spine or pelvis can aid assessment when disease activity is unclear, but routine monitoring with serial spine radiographs is not recommended. 1

  • MRI has made identification of nr-axSpA possible by detecting inflammation before radiographic damage occurs 7
  • Spine MRI is considered positive for axial spondyloarthritis if three or more sites of inflammatory spondylitis are present 8
  • Contrast enhancement is not necessary for diagnosis 8
  • Much research is still needed regarding optimal MRI use, including distinguishing normal population changes from pathology 7

Treatment Goals

The primary goals are to alleviate symptoms, improve functioning, maintain work ability, decrease disease complications, and forestall skeletal damage as much as possible 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Axial spondyloarthritis: is there a treatment of choice?

Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2013

Guideline

Ankylosing Spondylitis Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Medical Necessity Determination for Avsola (Infliximab) in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Characteristic Spine Features of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.