What is the management plan for a 22-year-old female with low bone mass, indicated by a Z score of -1.9, suggestive of osteopenia or osteoporosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Low Bone Mass in a 22-Year-Old Female with Z-Score -1.9

This 22-year-old woman has low bone mass that warrants investigation for underlying causes and implementation of non-pharmacological interventions, but does not meet criteria for osteoporosis diagnosis or pharmacological treatment at this time. 1

Understanding the Z-Score in Young Women

  • A Z-score of -1.9 indicates bone mineral density (BMD) is 1.9 standard deviations below age-matched peers, which is classified as "within the expected range for age" since it is above -2.0. 1
  • In premenopausal women, osteoporosis cannot be diagnosed on BMD alone—it requires a Z-score ≤-2.0 PLUS secondary causes of osteoporosis or fragility fractures. 1
  • The WHO T-score criteria used for postmenopausal women do not apply to this patient; Z-scores must be used for women under 50. 2

Mandatory Evaluation for Secondary Causes

Immediately investigate for underlying conditions causing low bone mass, as this is not normal for a 22-year-old woman: 1, 3

Menstrual and Reproductive History

  • Assess menstrual regularity, age of menarche, presence of amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea (menstrual dysfunction is a major contributor to low BMD in young women). 1
  • Screen for functional hypothalamic amenorrhea, which commonly results from low energy availability. 1

Nutritional Assessment

  • Evaluate for eating disorders, restrictive eating patterns, or disordered eating behaviors. 1
  • Calculate energy availability: assess total caloric intake versus exercise energy expenditure. 1
  • Check calcium intake (should be >1000 mg/day) and vitamin D status (target 800-1000 IU/day). 3

Exercise and Activity Patterns

  • Determine if patient is an athlete or exercises excessively (female athlete triad: low energy availability, menstrual dysfunction, low BMD). 1
  • Assess for relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S) if athletic. 1

Medical History

  • Screen for endocrine disorders: thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, premature ovarian insufficiency, Cushing's syndrome. 1, 3
  • Review medications: glucocorticoids, anticonvulsants, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, aromatase inhibitors. 1, 3
  • Assess for malabsorption disorders: celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease. 3
  • Check for chronic diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, chronic kidney disease. 3

Laboratory Workup

  • Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel. 1
  • TSH, free T4, prolactin, FSH, LH, estradiol. 1
  • 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. 3
  • Consider celiac screening (tissue transglutaminase antibodies). 3

Primary Treatment: Non-Pharmacological Interventions

The cornerstone of treatment is addressing the underlying cause, particularly normalizing energy availability and body weight if deficient: 1

Nutritional Optimization

  • Increase energy intake by 300-600 kcal/day (1.2-2.4 MJ/day) if low energy availability is identified. 1
  • Weight gain of 5-9% body weight has been shown to restore menstrual function and improve BMD in amenorrheic young women. 1
  • Ensure calcium intake of at least 1000 mg/day through diet or supplementation. 3
  • Maintain vitamin D supplementation at 800-1000 IU/day. 3
  • Referral to sports dietitian if athlete or eating disorder specialist if disordered eating present. 1

Exercise Modification

  • If excessive exercise is contributing, reduce training volume by at least one rest day per week. 1
  • Implement weight-bearing and resistance exercises if sedentary. 3
  • Balance exercise energy expenditure with adequate caloric intake. 1

Lifestyle Modifications

  • Smoking cessation if applicable. 3
  • Limit alcohol consumption. 3

Pharmacological Treatment: NOT Indicated

Pharmacological treatment is NOT recommended for this patient at this time: 1

  • Bisphosphonates, denosumab, and other osteoporosis medications are not indicated for premenopausal women with Z-scores above -2.0 without fragility fractures. 1
  • Hormonal contraceptives may be considered if menstrual dysfunction is present, but primarily to restore menstrual function rather than as bone-specific therapy. 1
  • The American College of Physicians recommends against using menopausal estrogen therapy or raloxifene in women (this applies to postmenopausal women but underscores caution with hormonal interventions). 1

Monitoring Strategy

Repeat DXA scan in 12 months to assess response to interventions: 1, 3

  • Use the same DXA machine for accurate comparison. 3
  • If Z-score worsens to ≤-2.0, refer to endocrinologist or bone specialist. 3
  • If fragility fracture occurs despite Z-score >-2.0, immediate referral to bone specialist. 3
  • Monitor menstrual function monthly—resumption of menses is a key indicator of successful treatment. 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not initiate bisphosphonates or other osteoporosis medications based on BMD alone in premenopausal women. 1
  • Do not use T-scores for diagnosis or treatment decisions in this age group—only Z-scores are appropriate. 2
  • Do not assume the low BMD is "normal" or ignore it—always investigate for secondary causes in young women. 3
  • Do not focus solely on BMD without addressing underlying energy deficiency, menstrual dysfunction, or other contributing factors. 1
  • Do not overlook the female athlete triad or RED-S in athletic patients. 1
  • Weight gain is the strongest predictor of menstrual recovery and BMD improvement—nutritional intervention must be prioritized. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Interpreting T-scores for Osteoporosis Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Interpretation of Low Bone Mass Indicators

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What are the treatment recommendations for a 64-year-old female patient with osteopenia (bone density T score -2.2) in the lumbar spine?
What treatment is recommended for a patient with a T score of -1.6 and a C score of -0.9 for the left total hip, indicating osteopenia?
What is the treatment for osteopenia with a T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 in the left femoral neck?
What is the diagnosis and treatment plan for a 73-year-old female with osteopenia, presenting with a T score of -1.7 in the spine and -2.0 in the hip, indicating osteoporosis (bone mineral density loss)?
What is the best management approach for an 83-year-old female with osteopenia, a 10-year probability of major fracture of 1.51%, and hip fracture of 4.6%?
What is the best antibiotic for a patient with sinusitis and pharyngitis, who has a penicillin allergy and is taking apixaban (apixaban) and antihypertensive (blood pressure) medications?
Should a patient with lung cancer and a identified Jak2 (Janus kinase 2) V617F mutation, with a normal Complete Blood Count (CBC), be treated for the mutation?
What could be causing a pulsating sensation under my right breast?
What is the ejection fraction (EF) of a patient with decompensated heart failure (HF)?
What is the differential diagnosis and management of albuminuria (presence of albumin in the urine)?
What is the recommended follow-up timeline for a colonoscopy in a patient with a polyp containing tubular adenoma fragments, a colonic leiomyoma, a tubular adenoma, and a hyperplastic polyp?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.