Long-Term Side Effects of Kesimpta (Ofatumumab)
Kesimpta demonstrates a favorable long-term safety profile with up to 3.5 years of continuous treatment data showing no new safety signals, stable immunoglobulin levels in most patients, and manageable infection risks. 1
Most Common Long-Term Adverse Events
The most frequently reported adverse events during extended ofatumumab treatment include:
- Upper respiratory tract infections occur commonly, along with nasopharyngitis, headache, and urinary tract infections 2
- Injection-related reactions affect approximately 20% of patients (versus 15% with placebo), with 99.8% being mild to moderate in severity 3
- These injection reactions typically decrease over time—from 86% during the first infusion to 42% during subsequent infusions in observational data 4
Infection Risk Profile
The overall infection rate with ofatumumab is comparable to other disease-modifying therapies:
- Infections occurred in 51.6% of ofatumumab-treated patients versus 52.7% with teriflunomide in phase 3 trials 3
- Serious infections remain low at 2.5% in the ofatumumab group versus 1.8% with teriflunomide 3
- No opportunistic infections or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) cases have been identified in patients with up to 3.5 years of exposure 1
- Six patients required hospitalization for infections in one observational cohort over a median 2.2 years of treatment 4
Immunoglobulin Changes and Monitoring
A critical long-term consideration is the impact on immunoglobulin levels:
- Mean IgG levels remain stable throughout extended treatment 1
- Mean IgM levels decrease but typically remain above the lower limit of normal in most patients 1
- Decreased immunoglobulin levels were not associated with increased serious infections after 3.5 years of treatment 1
- Regular monitoring of IgM and IgG levels is recommended, as low IgM can increase risk of infections with encapsulated bacteria 5
Malignancy Risk
- The risk of malignancies remains low with extended ofatumumab exposure 1
- This represents an important safety distinction from some other immunosuppressive therapies
Immunogenicity and Antibody Formation
Ofatumumab has an exceptionally low immunogenic risk:
- Only 2 of 914 patients (0.2%) developed anti-drug antibodies in the ASCLEPIOS I/II trials 3
- This low rate is attributed to ofatumumab's fully human monoclonal antibody structure 3
- The minimal immunogenicity contributes to sustained efficacy and reduced risk of infusion reactions over time 3
Cardiovascular and Other Systemic Effects
Unlike some other disease-modifying therapies, ofatumumab does not carry warnings for:
- Cardiac toxicity or QT prolongation (concerns seen with some tyrosine kinase inhibitors) 6
- Hepatotoxicity (a concern with some oral DMTs)
- Thrombocytopenia (unlike efalizumab, which required platelet monitoring) 6
Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Live-attenuated vaccines are contraindicated during ofatumumab treatment:
- Complete all two-dose vaccine regimens at least 4-6 weeks before starting therapy 7
- This is a critical consideration for long-term treatment planning
Do not discontinue effective therapy prematurely:
- Switching from stable ofatumumab therapy risks disease reactivation during washout periods 7
- The subcutaneous formulation allows convenient long-term adherence 3
Comparison to Other Anti-CD20 Therapies
The long-term safety profile of ofatumumab appears consistent with the broader class effect of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, with some advantages:
- Lower systemic injection-related reactions compared to intravenous formulations due to the low-dose subcutaneous route (20 mg monthly) 3
- No increased infection risk compared to ocrelizumab, which also shows good long-term tolerability over ≥7.5 years 7
- The fully human structure may contribute to better long-term tolerability compared to humanized antibodies 3
Duration of Safety Data
Current evidence extends to 3.5 years of continuous treatment from the ALITHIOS extension study, with 1,292 patients continuously treated (3,253 patient-years of exposure) 1. This represents robust medium-term data, though longer follow-up beyond 5 years will be important for detecting rare late complications.