PRP Therapy for Hair Loss: Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol
Administer three intradermal PRP injection sessions spaced exactly one month apart (months 0,1, and 2), combined with topical minoxidil 5% applied twice daily, followed by maintenance PRP injections every 6 months to sustain results. 1, 2
Treatment Protocol
Initial Treatment Phase
- Three treatment sessions delivered at precisely one-month intervals (baseline, month 1, month 2) 1, 2
- Injection technique: Point-by-point delivery at 90-degree angle, 2-4 mm depth, spacing injections 1 cm apart across mapped areas of hair loss 1
- Volume per session: 5-7 mL of PRP using 30-gauge × 4 mm needles 1
- Concurrent therapy: Topical minoxidil 5% at 1 mL applied twice daily throughout treatment and beyond 1, 2
PRP Preparation Specifications
- Use nonactivated PRP only—activation before injection should be avoided as nonactivated PRP demonstrates 31% greater increases in hair count and total hair density compared to activated PRP 1, 2
- Target platelet concentration: 1.0-1.5 million platelets per microliter using manual double-spin centrifugation method 1
- Process autologous blood immediately after collection 1
Maintenance Phase
- Maintenance injections every 6 months are mandatory to sustain results, as discontinuation results in complete loss of gains within months 1, 3
- Continue topical minoxidil 5% twice daily indefinitely 2
Expected Outcomes and Timeline
Early Response Indicators
- Initial improvements become visible at 2-3 months of continuous therapy 1, 3
- A 25% improvement in hair density at 2 months predicts sustained response at 6 months 1, 2
Six-Month Results
- Hair density increases by 1.74 times baseline 1, 2
- Hair diameter increases by 14.3 times baseline 1, 2
- Telogen phase hair decreases by 9.3 times 1
- Mean hair density increases from approximately 34 hairs/cm² to 50 hairs/cm² 4
- Terminal to vellus hair ratio improves in 60% of patients 4
Combination Therapy Superiority
The combination of PRP with topical minoxidil 5% is significantly more effective than either monotherapy, and both monotherapies are superior to placebo. 5, 1, 2
- PRP with minoxidil demonstrates the highest treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction scores compared to either treatment alone 5, 6
- For maximal efficacy, the triple combination (PRP + minoxidil + finasteride) represents the most effective evidence-based approach 3
Patient Selection and Response Prediction
Best Candidates
- Mild to moderate androgenetic alopecia responds most favorably to PRP treatment 1, 2
- More severe grades show variable results 1
- Both male and female pattern hair loss respond to treatment 7, 4
Monitoring Treatment Response
- Use trichoscopy to evaluate hair density and diameter 2
- Standardized before-and-after photographs 2
- Patient self-assessment questionnaires 2
- Hair pull test (becomes significantly negative in 83% of patients after treatment) 5
Safety Profile and Adverse Effects
- Pain during injection is the primary complaint, though generally well-tolerated 5, 1
- Apply pharmaceutical-grade topical anesthetic before injection to minimize discomfort 1
- No serious adverse effects reported in clinical studies 7, 4, 6, 8
- Minoxidil is better tolerated than PRP in terms of pain, but PRP avoids systemic side effects 5
Critical Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Common Errors
- Do not use activated PRP—this reduces efficacy by 31% compared to nonactivated preparations 1, 2
- Do not skip maintenance injections—results are not permanent and require ongoing treatment every 6 months 1, 3
- Do not use PRP as monotherapy—always combine with topical minoxidil 5% for superior outcomes 5, 1, 2
- Do not expect results before 2-3 months—early discontinuation due to perceived lack of response is a common mistake 1, 3
Treatment Discontinuation Consequences
- Continuous treatment is mandatory to maintain benefits 1, 3
- Discontinuation results in complete loss of gains within months 2, 3
- Relapse of androgenetic alopecia occurs 12-16 months after stopping treatment 8
Emerging Alternative: Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)
- PRF is emerging as a potentially superior alternative to PRP with theoretical advantages including lower cost and easier preparation 1
- PRF demonstrates similar clinical efficacy and safety profile to PRP 1
- Consider PRF as an alternative when cost or preparation complexity is a barrier 1