What are the different types of Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) protocols?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Protocols

There are three main FET protocols: natural cycle (with or without ovulation trigger), modified natural cycle (with HCG trigger), and artificial/hormone therapy cycle (with estrogen and progesterone supplementation, with or without GnRHa suppression). 1

Natural Cycle FET

True natural cycle FET involves monitoring the patient's spontaneous ovulation without any hormonal intervention 2:

  • Requires daily blood or urine luteinizing hormone measurements to detect the natural LH surge 2
  • No exogenous estrogen, progesterone, or HCG is administered 3
  • Embryo transfer timing is based on natural ovulation detection 1
  • Appropriate only for women with regular ovulatory menstrual cycles 2
  • Live birth rate of approximately 37% per transfer 3

Key limitation: High cycle cancellation rate—99 out of 476 cycles (21%) were cancelled in one large randomized trial 3

Modified Natural Cycle FET

Modified natural cycle with HCG trigger uses minimal intervention to control timing 2:

  • Follicular development is monitored via ultrasound 1
  • HCG injection (typically 5,000-10,000 IU) is administered to trigger ovulation when the dominant follicle reaches appropriate size 2
  • Progesterone luteal support is initiated after ovulation 4
  • Live birth rate of approximately 33% per transfer 3
  • Similar cancellation rate to true natural cycle (99/476 cycles cancelled) 3

Enhanced modified natural cycle protocol adds additional luteal support 4:

  • One injection of recombinant HCG on day of transfer 4
  • One injection of GnRH agonist 4 days after transfer 4
  • This modification achieved significantly higher implantation (31% vs 17%), clinical pregnancy (51% vs 26%), and ongoing pregnancy rates (46% vs 20%) compared to standard natural cycle 4

Scheduled modified natural cycle allows flexible timing 5:

  • Short-duration GnRH antagonist (1 ampule/day) with low-dose gonadotropins (75 IU/day) delays ovulation 5
  • Enables scheduling of transfer day without compromising outcomes 5
  • Live birth rate of 57.0% (not significantly different from traditional natural cycle at 49.4%) 5
  • Eliminates cycle cancellations while maintaining natural cycle benefits 5

Artificial/Hormone Therapy (HT) Cycle FET

Standard HT protocol uses sequential hormone administration 2:

  • Oral estradiol valerate 8 mg/day starting from day 2-4 of menstruation 3
  • Endometrial thickness monitored via ultrasound 1
  • Progesterone supplementation (typically vaginal 800 mg/day) begins when endometrial thickness reaches ≥7 mm 6, 7, 3
  • Live birth rate of approximately 34% per transfer 3
  • Zero cycle cancellations (0/476 cycles in large RCT) 3

Timing considerations for HT protocol 6, 7:

  • Progesterone should only begin after achieving endometrial thickness ≥7 mm, regardless of days of estrogen administered 7
  • After positive pregnancy test, continue estrogen and progesterone at original doses for 3-4 weeks 6
  • Then gradually reduce dosage to complete discontinuation within 2 weeks 6

HT with GnRHa suppression adds pituitary downregulation 1:

  • GnRH agonist administered before or concurrent with estrogen 1
  • One small study (n=75) suggested higher live birth rates with GnRHa suppression compared to HT alone (OR 0.10,95% CI 0.04-0.30) 1
  • However, this finding requires validation in larger trials 1

Comparative Effectiveness

No clear superiority exists between protocols based on current evidence 2, 1:

  • A 2024 randomized trial of 1,428 women found no significant difference in live birth rates: natural cycle 37%, modified natural 33%, artificial cycle 34% 3
  • The Cochrane review concluded insufficient evidence to recommend one regimen over another 1
  • Maternal and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups 3

Critical practical differences 3:

  • Natural and modified natural cycles have high cancellation rates (approximately 21%) 3
  • Artificial cycles have zero cancellations, providing scheduling reliability 3
  • Natural cycles require intensive monitoring with frequent ultrasounds and hormone measurements 2
  • Artificial cycles are the only option for women with irregular or absent ovulation 2

Protocol Selection Algorithm

For women with regular ovulatory cycles 2, 3:

  • Consider modified natural cycle with enhanced luteal support (HCG + GnRH agonist) if scheduling flexibility exists and patient accepts 21% cancellation risk 4
  • Consider scheduled modified natural cycle protocol if scheduling control is needed while maintaining natural cycle approach 5
  • Choose artificial cycle if scheduling certainty is essential or patient cannot tolerate multiple monitoring visits 3

For women with irregular cycles or anovulation 2:

  • Artificial HT cycle is the only appropriate option 2

Common pitfall to avoid: Do not initiate progesterone in artificial cycles before endometrial thickness reaches ≥7 mm, as premature progesterone exposure may compromise implantation 6, 7

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.