Updated USPSTF Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations (2018)
The most significant update in the 2018 USPSTF guidelines is the explicit endorsement of primary high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing alone every 5 years as an equally acceptable screening option for women aged 30-65 years, alongside cytology alone every 3 years and cotesting every 5 years. 1, 2
Key Changes from 2012 Guidelines
The 2018 update represents an evolution rather than revolution, with one critical addition:
Primary hrHPV testing alone every 5 years is now explicitly recommended as a standalone screening option for women aged 30-65 years, whereas the 2012 guidelines only endorsed cytology alone or cotesting 1, 2
The 2012 guidelines specifically recommended against HPV testing alone in women under 30 years, and this prohibition remains unchanged in 2018 1
Complete 2018 Screening Algorithm
Women Aged 21-29 Years
- Screen with cervical cytology alone every 3 years (Grade A recommendation) 1, 2
- HPV testing (alone or with cotesting) is explicitly not recommended in this age group 3
- This applies regardless of sexual history or HPV vaccination status 1
Women Aged 30-65 Years
Three equally acceptable options (Grade A recommendation) 1, 2:
- Cervical cytology alone every 3 years
- Primary hrHPV testing alone every 5 years (new in 2018)
- Cotesting (cytology + hrHPV) every 5 years
- All three strategies provide similar mortality reduction with different harm profiles 2, 4
- Cotesting increases follow-up procedures without substantially increasing detection of high-grade lesions compared to hrHPV alone 1
Women Under Age 21
- Do not screen, regardless of sexual history (Grade D recommendation) 1, 2
- Screening before age 21 causes more harm than benefit due to unnecessary treatment of lesions that naturally regress 3
Women Over Age 65
- Discontinue screening if adequate prior screening documented and not otherwise high-risk (Grade D recommendation) 1, 2
- Adequate prior screening = 3 consecutive negative cytology tests OR 2 consecutive negative cotests within past 10 years, with most recent test within 5 years 3, 5
Post-Hysterectomy
- Do not screen if cervix removed and no history of high-grade precancerous lesion (CIN 2/3) or cervical cancer (Grade D recommendation) 1, 2
Important Caveats and Implementation Challenges
FDA Approval Concerns
- The USPSTF initially hesitated to endorse primary hrHPV testing in their 2017 draft due to limited FDA-approved tests for primary screening 1
- The final 2018 statement included this option after public comment, acknowledging that hrHPV testing will eventually dominate screening but implementation readiness varies 1
Populations Excluded from Standard Guidelines
These recommendations do not apply to 1:
- Women with diagnosed high-grade precancerous lesions or cervical cancer
- Women with in utero diethylstilbestrol exposure
- Immunocompromised women (including HIV-positive individuals)
- These populations require individualized, more intensive surveillance 3, 6
Special Screening Scenarios
History of CIN 2/3 or cervical cancer:
- Continue screening for at least 20-25 years after treatment, even if this extends past age 65 5
Never-screened women over 65:
- Offer screening despite age, as 42% of cervical cancers in women ≥65 occur in never-screened individuals 5
- Modeling shows 74% mortality reduction with screening versus remaining unscreened 5
HPV vaccination status:
- Vaccinated women follow identical screening recommendations as unvaccinated women 3
- Vaccination does not eliminate screening need because vaccines don't cover all oncogenic HPV types 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not use HPV testing (alone or cotesting) in women under 30 years - this leads to unnecessary procedures for transient infections that clear spontaneously 3
Do not stop screening at age 65 without verifying adequate prior screening through medical records - verbal patient report is insufficient 5
Do not discontinue screening in women with prior CIN 2/3 until 20-25 years post-treatment, regardless of current age 5
Do not screen women post-hysterectomy for benign indications - this provides no benefit and represents unnecessary healthcare utilization 5
Evidence Quality and Certainty
The USPSTF assigned high certainty that benefits outweigh harms for all three screening strategies in women aged 30-65 years 1, 2. The decision analysis modeling demonstrated that while strategies differ in their balance of colposcopies, false-positives, and cancer detection, all substantially reduce cervical cancer mortality compared to no screening 4.