What is the final diagnosis for a patient with fever, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, elevated C-Reactive Protein (CRP), normal Hemoglobin (Hb) and platelets, and nodular consolidation in the left lung, who responded to treatment with Ceftriaxone (Ceftriaxone) and Azithromycin (Azithromycin)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Final Diagnosis: Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) with Atypical Pathogen

Based on the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging characteristics, and rapid response to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin, your final diagnosis is most likely community-acquired pneumonia caused by an atypical pathogen, specifically Mycoplasma pneumoniae or Chlamydophila pneumoniae.

Clinical Reasoning for Diagnosis Revision

Key Diagnostic Features Supporting Atypical CAP

The constellation of findings strongly suggests atypical pneumonia rather than enteric fever:

  • Fever pattern with minimal localizing symptoms initially followed by gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) is consistent with atypical CAP, particularly Mycoplasma 1, 2

  • Laboratory findings show elevated CRP (119 mg/L) with normal-to-low WBC count (6000 dropping to 3900), which is characteristic of atypical pathogens rather than typical bacterial pneumonia or enteric fever 1

  • Normal hemoglobin and platelets argue against dengue and make enteric fever less likely, as typhoid typically causes relative bradycardia and leukopenia with thrombocytopenia 1

  • CT chest findings of nodular consolidation with ground-glass opacities (GGOs) in the lateral basal segment are highly characteristic of atypical pneumonia, particularly Mycoplasma or viral pneumonia 1, 3

Why Not Enteric Fever?

Several features make enteric fever (typhoid/paratyphoid) unlikely as the final diagnosis:

  • Rapid fever resolution within 2 days of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin is too quick for enteric fever, which typically requires 5-7 days of appropriate therapy 2

  • Pulmonary involvement with nodular consolidation and GGOs is uncommon in enteric fever; when present, it usually manifests as bronchitis rather than pneumonia with consolidation 1

  • Normal platelet count argues against enteric fever, which commonly causes thrombocytopenia 1

  • Negative malaria and dengue tests with GI symptoms initially suggested enteric fever, but the pulmonary findings and rapid response pattern are more consistent with atypical CAP 1, 3

Treatment Efficacy Analysis

The patient's excellent response to ceftriaxone plus azithromycin supports atypical CAP:

  • Ceftriaxone provides coverage for typical bacterial pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae) while azithromycin covers atypical organisms (Mycoplasma, Chlamydophila, Legionella) 1, 2, 3

  • The combination regimen is guideline-concordant first-line therapy for hospitalized non-ICU patients with CAP, with strong recommendation and high-quality evidence 1, 2

  • Fever resolution within 48 hours suggests a bacterial or atypical pathogen responsive to the empiric regimen, consistent with the 95.2% clinical cure/improvement rate reported for this combination 4

Imaging Correlation

The CT findings are pathognomonic for atypical pneumonia:

  • Nodular consolidation with GGOs represents the characteristic "tree-in-bud" pattern or patchy infiltrates seen with atypical organisms 1

  • Lateral basal segment involvement is consistent with bronchopneumonia pattern typical of Mycoplasma rather than lobar consolidation of S. pneumoniae 1

  • Absence of cavitation, pleural effusion, or rapid progression makes severe bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis, or fungal infection less likely 1

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls Avoided

Your diagnostic revision demonstrates appropriate clinical reasoning:

  • Initial empiric coverage for enteric fever was reasonable given the fever pattern, GI symptoms, and endemic area considerations, but the pulmonary findings prompted appropriate reassessment 1, 2

  • Obtaining CT imaging was crucial for identifying the pulmonary pathology that redirected the diagnosis 1

  • The combination of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin provided coverage for both typical and atypical pathogens, ensuring appropriate therapy regardless of the specific etiology 1, 2, 3

Recommended Follow-Up

To confirm the diagnosis and ensure complete resolution:

  • Clinical review at 6 weeks with repeat chest imaging if symptoms persist or the patient has risk factors for underlying malignancy (age >50, smoking history) 2

  • No routine chest X-ray is needed prior to discharge if the patient demonstrates satisfactory clinical recovery 2

  • Consider serologic testing for Mycoplasma IgM/IgG or PCR if available, though treatment should not be delayed for results 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Antibiotic Regimen Recommendations for Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone followed by oral azithromycin for the treatment of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, non-comparative multicenter trial.

The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.