What is the workup and treatment for cervical radiculopathy?

Cervical Radiculopathy: Workup and Treatment

Clinical Diagnosis

Start with a focused history and physical examination targeting dermatomal pain distribution, motor weakness in specific muscle groups (e.g., C6: wrist extension, C7: elbow extension), sensory deficits, and reflex changes—these clinical findings must correlate with imaging to confirm the diagnosis. 1, 2

Key Clinical Features to Identify:

• Pain pattern: Neck pain radiating into the arm following a specific dermatomal distribution (C5-T1) 2, 3
• Motor dysfunction: Weakness in muscle groups corresponding to the affected nerve root (e.g., shoulder abduction for C5, wrist extension for C6, elbow extension for C7) 1, 2
• Sensory changes: Numbness or paresthesias in the dermatomal distribution of the compressed nerve root 2, 3
• Reflex abnormalities: Diminished or absent reflexes at the affected level 3

Diagnostic Imaging Algorithm:

• MRI is the gold standard and should be ordered first to confirm nerve root compression and correlate with clinical symptoms 1, 4
• CT scan is complementary when you need superior visualization of osseous structures (osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, uncovertebral joint pathology) 1, 4
• Critical pitfall: MRI findings must correlate with clinical symptoms—false positives are common as degenerative changes are ubiquitous in asymptomatic patients 1, 5

Common Etiologies:

• Soft disc herniation: Direct nerve root compression from herniated disc material 1, 2
• Hard disc/spondylosis: Osteophyte formation from facet or uncovertebral joints causing foraminal stenosis 1, 2

---

Treatment Algorithm

Initial Management: Conservative Treatment (First-Line for ALL Patients)

Begin with at least 6 weeks of comprehensive conservative management, as 75-90% of patients achieve symptomatic improvement without surgery. 1, 4, 5

Conservative Treatment Components:

• Anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) for pain and inflammation control 4, 6
• Physical therapy with structured exercises—this achieves comparable clinical improvements to surgery at 12 months, though surgery provides more rapid relief 1, 4
• Short-term cervical collar immobilization (avoid prolonged use to prevent deconditioning) 6
• Activity modification to reduce nerve root irritation 6
• Consider epidural steroid injections if other conservative measures fail 7, 6

Documentation Requirements:

• Record specific physical therapy interventions, frequency, and duration 1
• Document response to medication management 7
• Note functional limitations despite conservative care 7

---

Surgical Indications (After Failed Conservative Management)

Surgery is indicated when patients have persistent symptoms despite 6+ weeks of conservative treatment, significant functional deficits impacting quality of life, or progressive neurological deficits. 1, 4

Absolute Requirements Before Surgery:

• Clinical correlation: Symptoms must match the radiographic pathology 1, 5
• Radiographic confirmation: MRI showing moderate-to-severe foraminal stenosis or nerve root compression 1, 4
• Failed conservative therapy: Documented minimum 6-week trial with specific interventions 1, 4
• Functional impact: Activities of daily living limited by symptoms 1, 7

---

Surgical Options and Selection

Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF)

ACDF is the preferred surgical approach for most patients with cervical radiculopathy, providing 80-90% success rates for arm pain relief and 90.9% functional improvement. 1, 4

Indications for ACDF:

• Anterior pathology: Disc herniation, central stenosis, or foraminal stenosis from uncovertebral/facet joint hypertrophy 1
• Multilevel disease: Particularly when involving 2+ levels 1
• Moderate-to-severe foraminal stenosis with clinical correlation 1, 4

ACDF Advantages:

• Rapid symptom relief: Provides relief within 3-4 months compared to continued conservative treatment 1, 4
• Motor function recovery: 92.9% of patients achieve motor function recovery maintained over 12 months 1
• Direct decompression: Provides direct access to compressive lesions without crossing neural elements 1

Instrumentation Considerations:

• Anterior cervical plating reduces pseudarthrosis risk from 4.8% to 0.7% and improves fusion rates from 72% to 91% in two-level disease 1
• Maintains cervical lordosis and provides greater stability in multilevel fusions 1
• Single-level fusion: Plating is recommended but not absolutely required 1

---

Posterior Laminoforaminotomy

Posterior laminoforaminotomy is the preferred approach for soft lateral disc herniations or isolated foraminal stenosis when motion preservation is desired and anterior approach risks should be avoided. 1, 4

Specific Indications:

• Soft lateral cervical disc displacement causing radiculopathy 1, 4
• Cervical spondylosis with lateral recess narrowing (foraminal stenosis from osteophytes) 8, 1
• Patients preferring motion preservation without fusion 1

Outcomes:

• Success rates: 78-95.5% good-to-excellent results depending on pathology 8, 1, 4
• Motion preservation: Maintains segmental motion at the affected level 1
• Lower success in Worker's Compensation patients: 78% vs. 93% in non-compensation patients 8

Limitations:

• Recurrent symptoms: Up to 30% may experience symptom recurrence 1
• Not ideal for anterior pathology: Less effective for central disc herniations or significant anterior compression 1

---

Surgical Approach Selection Algorithm

1. Identify the primary pathology location:

   • Anterior/central disc herniation or central stenosis → ACDF 1
   • Lateral soft disc or isolated foraminal stenosis → Posterior laminoforaminotomy 1, 4

2. Assess number of levels involved:

   • Single-level disease → Either approach acceptable based on pathology location 1
   • Multilevel disease (2+ levels) → ACDF preferred for stability 1

3. Consider patient factors:

   • Desire for motion preservation → Posterior laminoforaminotomy 1
   • Need for rapid symptom relief → ACDF (relief within 3-4 months vs. 12 months for conservative/posterior approaches) 1, 4

---

Long-Term Outcomes

Surgical vs. Conservative Management:

• At 12 months: Physical therapy achieves comparable clinical improvements to surgical interventions 1, 4
• Rapid relief advantage: Surgery provides more rapid relief within 3-4 months compared to conservative management 1, 4
• Motor function: Long-term improvements in wrist extension, elbow extension, and shoulder abduction are maintained over 12 months with anterior decompression 1

Realistic Expectations:

• Arm pain relief: 80-90% success rate with either anterior or posterior surgical approaches 1, 9
• Motor recovery: Strength improvements are maintained over 12 months but may not achieve 100% return to baseline 1
• Complication rate: Approximately 5% for ACDF 1

---

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

• Premature surgery: Do not operate before documenting adequate 6-week conservative trial—90% improve without surgery 1, 4
• Anatomic mismatch: Always confirm that symptoms correlate with imaging findings; do not fuse levels with insufficient stenosis 1, 5
• Ignoring instability: Obtain flexion-extension radiographs to rule out segmental instability before considering arthroplasty 1
• Operating on asymptomatic imaging findings: Degenerative changes are ubiquitous—only operate when clinical symptoms match radiographic pathology 1, 5