Can a patient with Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) take atovaquone indefinitely for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) prevention if allergic to Bactrim (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Atovaquone for Indefinite PCP Prophylaxis in Bactrim-Allergic AIDS Patients

Yes, atovaquone can be used indefinitely for PCP prophylaxis in AIDS patients who are allergic to Bactrim, as it is FDA-approved for this indication and recommended by guidelines as an alternative prophylactic agent when TMP-SMX cannot be tolerated. 1

FDA-Approved Indication

  • Atovaquone oral suspension is specifically FDA-approved for the prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in adults and adolescents (aged 13 years and older) who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. 1
  • The recommended dosage for prophylaxis is 1,500 mg (10 mL) once daily administered with food. 1
  • There is no specified time limit on duration of prophylaxis in the FDA labeling, supporting indefinite use as long as immunosuppression persists. 1

Guideline Support for Long-Term Use

  • The 2002 USPHS/IDSA guidelines explicitly list atovaquone as an acceptable alternative prophylactic regimen for PCP when TMP-SMZ cannot be tolerated. 2
  • Atovaquone appears to be as effective as aerosolized pentamidine or dapsone for PCP prophylaxis. 2, 3
  • Guidelines recommend continuing prophylaxis indefinitely in patients with CD4+ counts <200 cells/µL or until immune reconstitution occurs with antiretroviral therapy. 2

Efficacy Evidence

  • A large randomized trial comparing atovaquone (1500 mg daily) with dapsone (100 mg daily) in 1,057 HIV-infected patients intolerant to TMP-SMX showed similar efficacy over a median 27-month follow-up period. 4
  • PCP developed in 15.7 cases per 100 person-years with atovaquone versus 18.4 cases per 100 person-years with dapsone (relative risk 0.85,95% CI 0.67-1.09, p=0.20). 4
  • Among patients not already receiving dapsone at baseline, atovaquone was better tolerated and may be the preferred choice for prophylaxis. 4

Critical Administration Requirements

  • Atovaquone MUST be administered with food to ensure adequate absorption. 1
  • Failure to take atovaquone with food results in significantly lower plasma concentrations that may limit therapeutic response. 1
  • Consider alternative therapy in patients who cannot reliably take medication with food or who have gastrointestinal disorders limiting oral absorption. 1

Safety Profile for Long-Term Use

  • Atovaquone is generally well-tolerated with fewer treatment-limiting adverse events compared to TMP-SMX (7% vs 20%). 5
  • The most common adverse effects include maculopapular rash, gastrointestinal disturbances, and fever. 6
  • Cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported; monitor liver function in patients with severe hepatic impairment. 1
  • Atovaquone is safe in G6PD deficiency, unlike dapsone which is absolutely contraindicated. 3

Advantages Over Other Alternatives

  • Atovaquone provides potential cross-protection against toxoplasmosis, particularly important for patients with CD4 counts <100 cells/mm³. 2, 3
  • Unlike aerosolized pentamidine, atovaquone provides systemic prophylaxis and is more convenient for long-term use. 3
  • Dapsone is contraindicated in G6PD deficiency, making atovaquone the safest alternative in this population. 3

Important Caveats

  • Atovaquone is substantially more expensive than other prophylactic regimens. 2, 6
  • Earlier guidelines (1995,1997) stated that data on atovaquone efficacy for PCP prophylaxis were insufficient for firm recommendations, but this changed by 2002 when it received a BI recommendation. 2
  • The relative risk of death was similar between atovaquone and dapsone (1.07,95% CI 0.89-1.30). 4
  • Prophylaxis should be continued indefinitely until CD4+ counts increase to >200 cells/µL for ≥3 months on effective antiretroviral therapy. 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.