The Importance of Buffers in Hartmann's and Sterofundin Solutions
Primary Function: Prevention of Hyperchloremic Metabolic Acidosis
Buffers in Hartmann's solution (lactated Ringer's) and Sterofundin are essential because they prevent hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis that occurs with large-volume 0.9% saline administration, thereby reducing major adverse kidney events (MAKE), mortality, and the need for renal replacement therapy. 1
The buffer systems work by providing an alternative anion (lactate in Hartmann's, acetate/malate in Sterofundin) instead of excessive chloride, maintaining physiologic acid-base balance during fluid resuscitation. 1
Mechanism of Buffer Action
Lactate Buffer (Hartmann's Solution)
- Lactate is metabolized primarily in the liver to bicarbonate, providing alkalinizing capacity without directly administering bicarbonate 2
- Each liter of Hartmann's contains 28 mEq of lactate, which generates bicarbonate through hepatic metabolism 2
- The solution provides 9 calories per liter from lactate metabolism 2
- Lactate does not worsen lactic acidosis despite containing lactate, as demonstrated in clinical practice 3
Multi-Buffer System (Sterofundin)
- Sterofundin uses acetate and malate as buffers instead of lactate alone 4, 5
- These buffers are metabolized to bicarbonate through different pathways, providing more stable acid-base control 5, 6
- Studies show Sterofundin produces "nonremarkable changes in acid-base physiology" compared to significant acidosis with unbuffered solutions 4
Clinical Evidence for Buffered Solutions
Superiority Over 0.9% Saline
- Large-volume 0.9% saline administration causes hyperchloremic acidosis, renal vasoconstriction, and acute kidney injury 1
- A propensity-matched study of 22,851 surgical patients showed hyperchloremia in ~20% of patients receiving saline, associated with increased 30-day mortality 1
- The SALT trial demonstrated patients receiving large volumes of saline had higher rates of MAKE (death, need for dialysis, persistent renal dysfunction) compared to buffered fluids 1
- A trial of 15,802 critically ill patients confirmed buffered crystalloids were associated with lower risk of MAKE than 0.9% saline 1
Specific Surgical Outcomes
- Registry data from >30,000 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery showed fewer complications with buffered crystalloids versus saline 1
- One trial in major abdominal surgery was terminated early due to increased vasopressor requirements in the saline group 1
- In neurosurgery, Sterofundin provided "significantly better control over acid-base balance, sodium and chloride levels" compared to normal saline 5
Guideline Recommendations
Strong Recommendations for Buffered Solutions
- The British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 guidelines strongly recommend buffered crystalloid solutions over 0.9% saline in the perioperative period (Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence) 1
- In critical illness, buffered crystalloid solutions are strongly recommended in the absence of hypochloremia (Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence) 1
- For kidney transplantation, buffered solutions are strongly recommended over saline to reduce delayed graft function (Strong recommendation, high-quality evidence) 1
Exception: Traumatic Brain Injury
- The only major exception is traumatic brain injury, where 0.9% saline is preferred 1, 3
- The benefit may be related to tonicity or salt load rather than buffer content, but this remains under investigation 1
Specific Clinical Scenarios
When Hartmann's Should Be Avoided
- Crush injury/rhabdomyolysis: Hartmann's must be avoided due to potassium content (4 mEq/L), which can worsen hyperkalemia from muscle breakdown 1, 2
- Severe liver dysfunction: Impaired lactate metabolism may limit buffer effectiveness 1, 3
- Traumatic brain injury: Use 0.9% saline instead 1, 3
Optimal Use of Buffered Solutions
- Sepsis resuscitation: Buffered crystalloids reduce kidney injury risk 3
- Hemorrhagic shock without TBI: Hartmann's is preferred 3
- Major surgery: Buffered solutions reduce complications when large volumes are needed 1
- Burn resuscitation: Hartmann's is traditionally preferred for initial fluid therapy 3
Comparative Performance: Hartmann's vs. Sterofundin
Acid-Base Control
- Both solutions effectively prevent metabolic acidosis compared to saline 4, 5
- Sterofundin showed "no significant changes in pH" during scoliosis surgery, while Hartmann's produced statistically higher lactate levels 4
- In neurosurgery, 27.7% of saline patients developed pH <7.35 versus none with Sterofundin 5
Electrolyte Management
- Sterofundin demonstrated superior correction of hypernatremia and metabolic alkalosis compared to both saline and Hartmann's in patients with sellar tumors 6
- Both buffered solutions maintain physiologic strong ion difference better than saline 4
Clinical Equivalence in Many Settings
- In dehydrated cats, acetate-buffered (Sterofundin-type) and lactate-buffered (Hartmann's) solutions showed no significant differences in acid-base status, electrolytes, or lactate concentrations 7
- For CRRT, either lactate or bicarbonate buffers are acceptable in most patients (Grade C recommendation), with bicarbonate preferred in lactic acidosis or liver failure 1
Practical Algorithm for Buffer Selection
Identify patient condition:
For all other scenarios requiring crystalloid resuscitation:
Volume considerations:
Key Clinical Pitfalls
- Do not assume small differences in chloride content are clinically insignificant - the dose-response relationship between saline volume and adverse outcomes is well-established 1
- Do not use Hartmann's in crush syndrome despite its balanced electrolyte profile - the potassium content (4 mEq/L) is contraindicated 1, 2
- Do not avoid lactate-buffered solutions in patients with elevated lactate - they do not worsen lactic acidosis 3
- Monitor for metabolic alkalosis with bicarbonate-containing solutions in CRRT, as citrate anticoagulation can cause alkalosis 1