Normal Laboratory Values for Coagulation Tests
In healthy adults, normal coagulation values are: PT 11-13.5 seconds, INR 0.8-1.2, aPTT 25-35 seconds (reagent-dependent), and fibrinogen 200-400 mg/dL, though specific reference ranges must be established by each laboratory based on their local instrumentation and reagent combinations. 1
Prothrombin Time (PT) and INR
Standard PT Values
- PT clotting time in healthy adults typically ranges from 11 to 13.5 seconds, though this varies significantly based on the thromboplastin reagent and instrument used 1, 2
- The mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT) should be calculated as the geometric mean of PT values from at least 20 fresh plasma samples from healthy individuals of both sexes 1
- Each laboratory must establish its own MNPT with each new batch of thromboplastin using the same instrument employed for patient testing 1
INR Reference Range
- Normal INR values range from 0.8 to 1.2 in individuals not receiving anticoagulation therapy 3, 4
- The INR scale was specifically designed and validated only for monitoring vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) therapy, not as a general coagulopathy screening tool 1, 3, 4, 2
- Using INR values outside the context of warfarin monitoring lacks biological validity and can lead to inappropriate clinical decisions 1, 3, 4
Critical Laboratory Considerations for PT/INR
- Citrate concentration affects INR values: higher concentrations (3.8%) produce higher INR values compared to 3.2% citrate 1
- Underfilling blood collection tubes spuriously prolongs PT due to excess citrate 1
- The International Sensitivity Index (ISI) must be validated locally for each reagent/instrument combination, as manufacturer-provided ISI values are not invariably correct 1, 5, 6
- Automated clot detection methods can influence INR accuracy compared to the manual method upon which INR standardization is based 1, 5, 7
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)
Standard aPTT Values
- Normal aPTT typically ranges from 25 to 35 seconds in adults, though this is highly reagent-dependent and varies substantially between laboratories 1, 8, 2
- Each laboratory must establish its own reference range based on the specific aPTT reagent and coagulometer used 2, 7
- aPTT results should be reported as clotting time in seconds or as a ratio (patient-to-normal clotting time) 2
Clinical Context for aPTT Interpretation
- The aPTT evaluates the intrinsic and common coagulation pathways, including factors VIII, IX, XI, XII, and the contact activation system 8, 7
- When aPTT is elevated in isolation, perform a 50:50 mixing study immediately to differentiate between factor deficiency (mixing study corrects) and inhibitor presence (mixing study does not correct) 8
- Lupus anticoagulants typically prolong aPTT significantly but cause only slight PT prolongation 1, 8
Fibrinogen
Normal Fibrinogen Levels
- Normal fibrinogen concentration ranges from 200 to 400 mg/dL (2.0-4.0 g/L) in healthy adults 1
- Fibrinogen is an acute phase reactant and may be elevated in inflammatory states, pregnancy, and malignancy without indicating coagulation abnormality 1
Pediatric Considerations
Developmental Hemostasis
- Coagulation factor levels in neonates and children differ substantially from adults due to developmental hemostasis 1
- Decreased levels in children include: factors II, VII, IX, X, XI, XII, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin 1
- These physiological differences approach adult levels later in childhood or at puberty 1
- Despite different constituent protein levels, hemostatic balance is maintained in healthy children 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Specimen Collection Issues
- Always draw coagulation studies from peripheral veins, not central lines, as heparin contamination from line flushes artificially prolongs results 1
- Verify specimen quality by examining for clots and reviewing blood smears to exclude platelet aggregates causing spurious results 8
- EDTA-related pseudoprolongation requires redrawing with citrate tubes 8
Misuse of INR
- Never use INR to predict bleeding risk in patients not on warfarin therapy - it lacks validity for perioperative assessment, liver disease severity (beyond MELD scoring), trauma, or DIC 1, 3, 4
- INR does not predict bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis undergoing procedures, despite widespread misuse 1
- There is no high-quality evidence supporting plasma transfusion to correct INR values below 2.0 in non-warfarin patients 1, 3
Laboratory Standardization
- Do not assume manufacturer ISI values are accurate - local validation is essential as ISI values can vary among different coagulometer models even from the same manufacturer 1, 5, 6
- The College of American Pathologists recommends using responsive thromboplastin reagents (ISI ≤1.7) and reagent/instrument combinations with established ISI values 1