What is the role of newer insulins, such as ultra-long-acting insulins (e.g. insulin degludec (Tresiba) or insulin glargine U300 (Toujeo)) and rapid-acting insulins (e.g. insulin aspart (NovoRapid) or insulin lispro (Humalog)), in the management of diabetes mellitus, particularly for patients with type 1 diabetes or advanced type 2 diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Newer Insulins in Diabetes Management

Primary Recommendation

Newer insulin analogs—including ultra-long-acting insulins (degludec, glargine U300) and rapid-acting insulins (aspart, lispro)—should be the preferred choice for patients with type 1 diabetes and for type 2 diabetes patients requiring insulin who experience frequent hypoglycemia, as they provide superior hypoglycemia reduction compared to human insulins while achieving equivalent glycemic control. 1, 2


Type 1 Diabetes: Insulin Analogs as Standard of Care

Superiority Over Human Insulin

  • In type 1 diabetes, treatment with analog insulins is associated with less hypoglycemia and weight gain as well as lower A1C compared with human insulins. 1, 2

  • Rapid-acting analogs (aspart, lispro) reduce HbA1c by an additional 0.15% compared to regular human insulin, though this difference is modest. 1

  • The critical advantage lies in hypoglycemia reduction: long-acting analogs (detemir, glargine) significantly reduce severe hypoglycemia risk, with detemir showing the strongest effect (OR 0.37) in type 2 diabetes. 1

Ultra-Long-Acting Insulins: Enhanced Safety Profile

  • Newer ultra-long-acting basal analogs (U-300 glargine or degludec) confer lower hypoglycemia risk compared to U-100 glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes. 1, 3, 2

  • Insulin degludec demonstrates a 25% reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia compared to glargine (4.41 vs 5.86 episodes per patient-year; rate ratio 0.75), while achieving non-inferior glycemic control. 4

  • Degludec has an ultra-long duration of action exceeding 42 hours with a flat, peakless profile, compared to glargine's 24-hour duration. 3, 5

  • Degludec can be administered at varying times of day without loss of efficacy, whereas glargine requires consistent daily timing. 3, 6

Practical Implementation for Type 1 Diabetes

  • Total daily insulin requirements typically range from 0.4 to 1.0 units/kg/day, with approximately 50% as basal and 50% as prandial insulin. 1

  • Start with 0.5 units/kg/day in metabolically stable patients, divided equally between basal and prandial components. 1

  • Degludec reaches steady state after 3-4 days of administration with a half-life of approximately 25 hours. 5


Type 2 Diabetes: Selective Use Based on Clinical Context

When to Choose Insulin Analogs Over Human Insulin

  • The WHO recommends human insulin as first-line therapy in resource-limited settings, but long-acting insulin analogs should be considered for adults with frequent severe hypoglycemia. 1, 2

  • This recommendation reflects cost considerations: insulin analogs are several times more expensive than human insulin in most markets. 1

  • For patients with type 2 diabetes who can afford them or have insurance coverage, long-acting analogs are preferred due to reduced hypoglycemia risk, particularly nocturnal hypoglycemia. 2

Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes

  • Basal insulin (glargine or degludec) is typically added when A1C remains above target despite metformin and/or sulfonylurea therapy. 1, 6

  • Start with 10 units daily or 0.1-0.2 units/kg/day for insulin-naive patients. 6

  • If basal insulin exceeds 0.5 units/kg/day with A1C still above target, add GLP-1 receptor agonists or prandial insulin rather than continuing to escalate basal insulin alone. 3, 6

  • The ADA/EASD consensus recommends GLP-1 receptor agonists as the preferred injectable medication before insulin for most patients with type 2 diabetes, though basal insulin remains appropriate when extreme hyperglycemia is present. 3


Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs: Optimizing Prandial Control

Clinical Advantages

  • Rapid-acting analogs (aspart, lispro, glulisine) have quicker onset and peak with shorter duration of action than regular human insulin. 1

  • These agents can be administered closer to mealtime than regular human insulin, synchronizing insulin administration with food absorption and reducing postprandial hyperglycemia. 7

  • Faster-acting insulin aspart may reduce prandial excursions better than standard rapid-acting analogs, though further investigation is needed. 1

Practical Considerations

  • Because of their short duration of action, a slightly greater basal insulin supply may be needed when using rapid-acting analogs. 7

  • All rapid-acting analogs (aspart, lispro, glulisine) have similar pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical efficacy/safety profiles. 8


Special Populations and Situations

High-Risk Patients

  • Greatest caution is warranted for people at high risk of hypoglycemia, such as older patients and those with chronic kidney disease. 2

  • Elderly hospitalized patients with reduced oral intake should start with reduced total daily dose of 0.1-0.15 units/kg/day, given mainly as basal insulin. 6

  • Premixed human insulin should be avoided in the hospital setting due to unacceptable hypoglycemia risk—studies show a threefold higher rate of hypoglycemia compared with basal-bolus regimens using insulin analogs. 2

Renal and Hepatic Impairment

  • Total and peak exposure of degludec are 10-25% higher in patients with mild to severe renal impairment, though no systematic trend exists across subgroups. 5

  • Hemodialysis does not affect clearance of degludec in patients with end-stage renal disease. 5

  • No differences in degludec pharmacokinetics exist between healthy subjects and those with hepatic impairment. 5

Pediatric Patients

  • After adjusting for body weight, total exposure of degludec at steady state is independent of age in pediatric patients (1 to <18 years). 5

  • Higher insulin doses are required during puberty (up to 1.5 units/kg/day) due to hormonal influences. 6


Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Dosing Errors

  • Do not dilute or mix insulin glargine with any other insulin or solution due to its low pH. 6

  • U-300 glargine (Toujeo) requires approximately 10-18% higher daily doses compared to U-100 glargine due to modestly lower efficacy per unit. 6

  • U-500 regular insulin is indicated specifically for patients requiring >200 units of insulin per day. 6

Inappropriate Intensification

  • When basal insulin is optimally titrated to acceptable fasting glucose but A1C remains elevated, add prandial insulin or GLP-1 receptor agonist rather than continuing to escalate basal insulin. 6

  • The combination of basal insulin plus GLP-1 RA provides potent glucose-lowering with less weight gain and hypoglycemia compared to intensified insulin regimens alone. 6

Inadequate Duration Coverage

  • In some patients, glargine may not last 24 hours; dividing the dose into two daily injections should be considered. 6

  • Insulin detemir and glargine may require twice-daily dosing when once-daily administration fails to provide 24-hour coverage. 6


Cost-Effectiveness Considerations

Resource-Limited Settings

  • The WHO strongly recommends human insulin for universal use in low-resource settings, with insulin analogs reserved for patients with frequent severe hypoglycemia. 1

  • The relatively modest overall benefit from insulin analogs is outweighed by the large price difference in resource-limited contexts. 1

Resource-Rich Settings

  • In settings where cost is not prohibitive, the reduced hypoglycemia risk, improved quality of life, and greater dosing flexibility justify preferential use of insulin analogs. 1, 2

  • For type 1 diabetes specifically, the advantages of analog insulins in reducing hypoglycemia and weight gain while improving A1C make them the standard of care. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Insulin Formulation Safety and Efficacy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Comparison of Tresiba and Lantus for Diabetes Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Insulin Glargine Dosing and Administration

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Novel insulins: expanding options in diabetes management.

The American journal of medicine, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.