What are the criteria for diagnosing right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) in patients with suspected cor pulmonale?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Right Ventricular Hypertrophy Criteria in Cor Pulmonale

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of RVH in cor pulmonale has notably poor sensitivity (27-31%) despite reasonable specificity (85-88%), making ECG an inadequate standalone diagnostic tool for this condition. 1, 2

Primary Diagnostic Approach

Echocardiography: The Superior Method

Echocardiography should be the primary diagnostic modality for detecting RVH in cor pulmonale, as it demonstrates 93% sensitivity and 95% specificity compared to ECG's 27-31% sensitivity. 2

Key echocardiographic criteria for RVH diagnosis:

  • Right ventricular wall thickness (RVWT) ≥5 mm is the primary diagnostic criterion 2
  • Right ventricular internal diameter index (RVIDd) >1.33 cm indicates RV dilatation 3
  • Ratio of interventricular septum thickness to anterior RV wall thickness <1.99 suggests RVH 3
  • Right ventricular hypertrophy, increased RV size compared to left ventricle, and abnormal interventricular septal motion 1

ECG Criteria: Limited but Specific

When ECG does show RVH, the Butler-Leggett criteria achieve 89% sensitivity in cor pulmonale (higher than the 60% in mitral stenosis), though overall ECG sensitivity remains poor. 4

Classic ECG findings in cor pulmonale include:

  • Right axis deviation with deep S waves in precordial leads (characteristic of chronic obstructive lung disease) 1
  • Tall R waves in right precordial leads (V1) as part of Rs, R, or Qr complexes 1
  • R-wave amplitude criteria from leads I, V1, V6 and R-wave peak time in V1 1
  • P-wave amplitude in lead II ≥0.25 mV (right atrial enlargement) - carries prognostic significance with 2.8-fold increased mortality risk 1

Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls

The lowest accuracy for ECG diagnosis of RVH occurs specifically in chronic lung disease, making cor pulmonale the most challenging context for electrocardiographic detection. 1

Important confounding factors:

  • Hyperinflation from COPD causes low diaphragm position, creating characteristic ECG patterns that reflect anatomic changes rather than true RVH 1
  • Conduction defects and old myocardial infarction mask or mimic RVH patterns on ECG, affecting 73 of 212 patients in one series 2
  • Considerable RVH is required to overcome the dominant left ventricular vector, delaying ECG detection 1

Confirmatory Hemodynamic Assessment

Right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for confirming pulmonary hypertension underlying cor pulmonale, documenting mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg (recently revised to ≥20 mmHg), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood units. 1, 5

Practical Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Obtain echocardiography first - measure RVWT (diagnostic if ≥5 mm), RVIDd, and septal thickness ratio 3, 2
  2. Perform ECG - apply Butler-Leggett criteria if interpretable; note that negative ECG does not exclude RVH 4, 2
  3. Use chest radiography - look for enlarged central pulmonary arteries (>15 mm in women, >16 mm in men at right interlobar artery), pruning, and RV enlargement on lateral view 1
  4. Confirm with right heart catheterization - required before initiating PAH-specific therapy 1, 5

Secondary ST-T abnormalities (ST depression and T-wave inversion in right precordial leads) should not be termed "strain" but rather "secondary ST-T abnormality." 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.