What is the most direct test to check the amount of fluid in the lungs in a patient suspected of having pleural effusion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ultrasound is the Most Direct Test to Quantify Pleural Fluid

Ultrasound is the most accurate and direct test to check the amount of fluid in the lungs when pleural effusion is suspected, and should be used to confirm the presence of pleural fluid and estimate its volume. 1

Why Ultrasound is Superior

  • Ultrasound is more accurate than plain chest radiography for estimating pleural fluid volume and can detect fluid that may be missed on standard imaging 1
  • Ultrasound achieves a 97% success rate in identifying fluid even in small or loculated effusions where other methods fail 1, 2
  • The test has high diagnostic accuracy with mean sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 96% for detecting pleural effusions 3
  • Ultrasound can be performed portably at the bedside, allowing immediate assessment without transporting critically ill patients 1

Practical Volume Estimation

  • A simplified formula can estimate pleural fluid volume: V (ml) = 20 × Sep (mm), where Sep is the maximal distance between parietal and visceral pleura measured in the posterior axillary line 4
  • This measurement should be obtained with the patient supine at 15-degree trunk elevation, in end-expiration 4
  • The mean prediction error using this method is approximately 158 ml 4

Additional Capabilities Beyond Volume Assessment

  • Ultrasound differentiates free fluid from loculated fluid and pleural thickening, which chest X-ray cannot reliably distinguish 1
  • Fibrinous septations are better visualized on ultrasound than on CT scans 1
  • Complex septated or homogeneously echogenic patterns on ultrasound are highly specific (95.2%) for exudative effusions, helping predict the nature of the fluid before thoracentesis 5

Comparison with Other Imaging Modalities

Chest Radiography Limitations

  • Plain PA chest radiograph requires approximately 200 ml of fluid to show abnormality, while lateral films can detect as little as 50 ml 1
  • Supine chest radiographs often underestimate pleural fluid volume as fluid layers posteriorly 1

CT Scanning Role

  • CT scans should not be performed routinely for pleural effusion assessment 1
  • CT is reserved for cases requiring evaluation of pleural thickening characteristics (benign vs malignant), assessment of difficult-to-drain loculated effusions, or when underlying parenchymal disease needs clarification 1
  • Contrast-enhanced CT should be performed before full drainage if obtained, as pleural abnormalities are better visualized with fluid present 1

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do not attempt thoracentesis if effusion measures <1 cm thickness on lateral decubitus view due to increased complication risk 2
  • Always use ultrasound guidance for thoracentesis, as it increases safety and achieves 100% success rate with zero incidence of pneumothorax in studies 4
  • Ultrasound must be used to confirm the presence of pleural fluid collection before any intervention, particularly when chest radiograph shows "white out" where solid consolidation cannot be differentiated from large effusion 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Bilateral Small Pleural Effusions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnostic accuracy of sonography for pleural effusion: systematic review.

Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.