Can an abnormal heart rhythm, specifically atrial fibrillation, increase the risk of developing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Abnormal Heart Rhythm Cause DVT?

Yes, atrial fibrillation significantly increases the risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT), particularly during the first 6 months after AF diagnosis, though the association is stronger for pulmonary embolism than isolated DVT.

Mechanism of Thrombosis in Atrial Fibrillation

The pathophysiology follows Virchow's triad, creating conditions for both arterial and venous thromboembolism 1:

  • Blood stasis occurs from loss of organized atrial mechanical contraction during AF, with reduced left atrial appendage flow velocities detected on Doppler transesophageal echocardiography 1
  • Hypercoagulable state develops through systemic activation, with elevated fibrinogen, fibrin D-dimer levels, and markers of platelet activation (thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4) in both persistent and paroxysmal AF 1
  • Endothelial dysfunction contributes through elevated P-selectin and von Willebrand factor levels, though this is less definitively established than stasis 1

Quantified Risk of DVT in Atrial Fibrillation

The evidence demonstrates bidirectional association between AF and venous thromboembolism:

  • Immediate post-diagnosis period: AF patients have dramatically elevated VTE risk in the first 30 days (hazard ratio 6.64 in men, 7.56 in women) 2
  • First 6 months: The risk remains substantially elevated (HR 8.44,95% CI 5.61-12.69) compared to those without AF 3
  • Long-term risk: After 6 months, VTE risk remains elevated (HR 1.43-1.74) even with adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities 4, 5, 3
  • Overall incidence: DVT rates are 2.69 per 1,000 person-years in AF patients versus 1.12 in non-AF patients (crude HR 1.92) 5

Important Clinical Distinctions

Pulmonary Embolism vs. Deep Vein Thrombosis

AF shows stronger association with pulmonary embolism than isolated DVT, suggesting a distinct pathophysiologic mechanism 3, 6:

  • PE risk in first 6 months: HR 11.84 (95% CI 6.80-20.63) 3
  • DVT risk in first 6 months: HR 6.20 (95% CI 3.37-11.39) 3
  • After 6 months, AF remains associated with PE (HR 1.96) but not DVT (HR 1.08) 3
  • AF patients with PE have significantly lower incidence of newly diagnosed DVT (21% vs. 44%) compared to PE patients without AF 6

This pattern suggests that isolated PE in AF patients may originate from right atrial thrombi rather than lower extremity DVT, representing a distinct embolic mechanism 3, 6.

Risk Stratification by AF Type

Non-paroxysmal AF carries higher thrombotic risk than paroxysmal AF 1:

  • Pooled adjusted hazard ratio for thromboembolism: 1.384 (95% CI 1.191-1.608) for non-paroxysmal vs. paroxysmal AF 1
  • This increased risk applies to stroke/systemic embolism and likely extends to venous thromboembolism 1

Population-Specific Considerations

Black patients demonstrate particularly strong associations between AF and VTE 4:

  • AF-to-VTE association in Black patients: HR 2.30 (95% CI 1.48-3.58) vs. 1.71 overall 4
  • VTE-to-AF association in Black patients: HR 2.40 (95% CI 1.55-3.74) vs. 1.73 overall 4

Clinical Implications for Anticoagulation

Timing of Anticoagulation Initiation

The dramatically elevated VTE risk in the first 6 months after AF diagnosis supports early anticoagulation 2, 3:

  • Anticoagulation should be initiated promptly after AF diagnosis to reduce both arterial and venous thromboembolism risk 2
  • The VTE risk decreases substantially after anticoagulation therapy is established, with rates approaching control levels after 9 months in men 2

Anticoagulation Options

For AF patients requiring anticoagulation 7:

  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) like rivaroxaban are indicated to reduce stroke and systemic embolism risk in nonvalvular AF 7
  • Rivaroxaban is also specifically indicated for treatment of DVT and PE, and reduction in recurrence risk 7
  • Warfarin with target INR 2.0-3.0 remains an alternative, though DOACs are generally preferred for convenience and safety 8

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume PE in AF patients always originates from lower extremity DVT—right atrial thrombi may be the source, particularly in isolated PE without DVT 3, 6
  • Do not delay anticoagulation in newly diagnosed AF—the highest VTE risk occurs in the first 30 days to 6 months after diagnosis 2, 3
  • Do not overlook VTE risk assessment in Black patients with AF—they demonstrate disproportionately elevated risk 4
  • Avoid cardioversion without adequate anticoagulation (minimum 3 weeks prior) in AF lasting >48 hours, as atrial stunning post-cardioversion increases thromboembolism risk for up to 3-4 weeks 1, 8

Bidirectional Relationship

The relationship between AF and VTE is bidirectional 4:

  • VTE increases subsequent AF risk (HR 1.73,95% CI 1.34-2.24), especially in the first 6 months (HR 4.50) 4
  • This bidirectionality suggests shared pathophysiologic mechanisms including inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and hypercoagulability 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Atrial fibrillation and risk of venous thromboembolism: a Swedish Nationwide Registry Study.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021

Research

Atrial fibrillation and future risk of venous thromboembolism:the Tromsø study.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2015

Guideline

Left Atrial Clot Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.