Can men with diabetes (Diabetes Mellitus) be considered for a penile implant?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Men with Diabetes Get a Penile Implant?

Yes, men with diabetes can and should be considered for penile implant surgery when indicated for erectile dysfunction, though they face a modestly increased infection risk (1.5-fold higher) that can be substantially mitigated with antibiotic-impregnated prostheses and optimized glycemic control. 1, 2

Diabetes as an Indication, Not a Contraindication

  • Diabetes is one of the most common causes of erectile dysfunction requiring penile prosthesis implantation, affecting 35-90% of diabetic men through multiple mechanisms including autonomic neuropathy, vascular disease, and endothelial dysfunction. 3
  • Penile prosthesis represents the definitive surgical solution when first-line treatments (PDE5 inhibitors) fail in diabetic patients with ED. 4, 5
  • Diabetes itself does not preclude penile implant surgery—it is a recognized indication that requires specific perioperative management strategies. 5

Infection Risk: The Primary Concern

Quantifying the Risk

  • Meta-analysis demonstrates that diabetes increases penile prosthesis infection risk with an odds ratio of 1.53 (95% CI 1.15-2.04), meaning diabetic men have approximately 50% higher infection rates than non-diabetic men. 1
  • Contemporary infection rates in diabetic patients range from 1.47% to 4.17% depending on prosthesis type and surgical technique. 2
  • All infections in one prospective study occurred exclusively in the diabetic subgroup (5 of 32 diabetics, 0 of 58 non-diabetics), highlighting diabetes as the dominant infection risk factor. 6

The Glycemic Control Controversy

The evidence on HbA1c thresholds is contradictory, requiring clinical judgment:

  • One 1992 prospective study found that poorly controlled diabetics (HbA1c >11.5%) had a 31% infection rate versus 5% in controlled diabetics (HbA1c <11.5%), suggesting a critical threshold. 6
  • However, a larger 2018 retrospective study of 300 diabetic patients found no significant association between HbA1c levels and infection risk, with 0.9% infection rate in HbA1c ≤9% versus 0% in HbA1c >9%. 7
  • Given this conflicting evidence, the prudent approach is to optimize glycemic control preoperatively (target HbA1c <8%) while recognizing that HbA1c alone should not exclude diabetic candidates from surgery. 6, 7

Risk Mitigation Strategies

Antibiotic-Impregnated Prostheses: The Game-Changer

  • Use of minocycline/rifampin-impregnated inflatable penile prostheses reduces 7-year infection rates in diabetic men from 4.24% to 1.62% (log-rank p <0.0001). 2
  • This represents a 62% relative risk reduction in infection-related revisions over 7 years of follow-up in the largest known database of diabetic IPP recipients. 2
  • Antibiotic-impregnated prostheses should be considered standard of care for all diabetic patients undergoing penile implant surgery. 2

Preoperative Optimization Algorithm

Step 1: Glycemic Assessment

  • Measure HbA1c within 30 days of planned surgery. 6
  • If HbA1c >8%, delay elective surgery for 3 months of intensive diabetes management. 6
  • Recheck HbA1c before proceeding—target <8% for optimal outcomes. 6

Step 2: Cardiovascular Risk Stratification

  • Categorize patients using Princeton Consensus criteria before any ED treatment, as ED predicts coronary artery disease. 4, 3
  • Obtain cardiac clearance for high-risk patients before proceeding with surgery. 4

Step 3: Complication Screening

  • Screen for diabetic complications that may affect surgical outcomes: peripheral neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, and nephropathy. 3
  • Measure testosterone levels in men with symptoms of hypogonadism, as low testosterone is common in diabetic men and may affect outcomes. 4, 8

Surgical Considerations for Diabetic Patients

  • Diabetic patients require meticulous surgical technique with strict adherence to sterile protocols given their inherently higher infection susceptibility. 5
  • Corporal fibrosis may be more prevalent in diabetic men with long-standing ED, potentially complicating implantation and requiring specialized techniques. 5
  • Despite these challenges, penile prosthesis implantation remains an effective and safe treatment option for diabetic men when proper perioperative management is employed. 5

Postoperative Management

  • Maintain tight glycemic control in the immediate postoperative period, as hyperglycemia impairs wound healing and immune function. 6
  • Extended antibiotic prophylaxis may be warranted in diabetic patients, though specific duration recommendations vary by institution. 2
  • Long-term follow-up is essential, as infection-related revisions can occur years after initial implantation. 2

Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not deny penile implant surgery to diabetic men based solely on their diabetes diagnosis—this represents appropriate definitive treatment for refractory ED. 5
  • Do not rely exclusively on HbA1c cutoffs to exclude candidates, as the evidence is conflicting; instead, use HbA1c as one factor in comprehensive risk assessment. 6, 7
  • Do not use non-impregnated prostheses in diabetic patients when antibiotic-impregnated options are available, as this unnecessarily increases infection risk by 2.6-fold. 2
  • Do not proceed without cardiovascular risk assessment, as ED in diabetic men signals systemic vascular disease requiring evaluation. 4, 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.