Open Preperitoneal Mesh Hernioplasty for Inguinal Hernia
Open preperitoneal mesh repair is an excellent surgical approach for recurrent and high-risk inguinal hernias, offering comparable outcomes to laparoscopic techniques with the critical advantage of being performable under local anesthesia in patients with significant cardiovascular or other comorbidities who cannot tolerate general anesthesia. 1, 2
Surgical Approach Selection Algorithm
For Primary Inguinal Hernias (Clean Surgical Field)
- Synthetic mesh repair is mandatory regardless of approach, with 0% recurrence rates versus 19% with tissue repair, without increased infection risk 1, 3
- Laparoscopic approaches (TAPP or TEP) are preferred when general anesthesia is tolerated, offering lower wound infection rates and ability to identify contralateral hernias present in 11.2-50% of cases 2
- Open preperitoneal approach is appropriate when laparoscopic expertise is unavailable or patient cannot tolerate general anesthesia 2
For Recurrent Inguinal Hernias
- Open preperitoneal mesh repair is the preferred approach when the initial repair was anterior, as it accesses virgin tissue planes and avoids previously scarred areas 4, 5, 6
- This approach achieves 3.3-8.1% recurrence rates with mean follow-up of 37-42 months, comparable to laparoscopic techniques 4, 5, 6
- Mean operative time is 42-63 minutes for unilateral repairs, with hospital stays of 1.2-1.6 days 4, 6
- Return to work occurs in 8-9 days, significantly faster than anterior approaches (15.9 days) 6
For High-Risk Patients with Comorbidities
- Open preperitoneal repair under local anesthesia is the safest option for patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or inability to tolerate general anesthesia 1, 2, 4
- Local anesthesia is appropriate for incarcerated hernias without bowel gangrene 2
- This approach is particularly valuable for patients with cardiopulmonary insufficiency who cannot undergo laparoscopic repair requiring general anesthesia 4
Emergency/Complicated Hernia Management
Incarcerated Hernias Without Strangulation (Clean Field)
- Prosthetic repair with synthetic mesh is strongly recommended (Grade 1A), with significantly lower recurrence rates regardless of defect size 7, 2, 3
- Open preperitoneal approach allows mesh placement while maintaining option for local anesthesia 2
- Laparoscopic TAPP can assess bowel viability if general anesthesia is tolerated 1, 2
Strangulated Hernias with Bowel Resection (Clean-Contaminated Field, CDC Class II)
- Synthetic mesh can still be safely used even with bowel resection if there is no gross enteric spillage 7, 3
- This approach shows no significant increase in 30-day wound-related morbidity and significantly lower recurrence rates 7, 3
- Open preperitoneal approach is preferable when strangulation is suspected or bowel resection may be needed 1, 2
Contaminated/Dirty Fields (CDC Class III-IV)
- For small defects (<3 cm) with bowel necrosis or peritonitis: primary repair without mesh is recommended 7, 3
- For larger defects (≥3 cm): biological mesh is preferred when available, with choice between cross-linked and non-cross-linked depending on defect size and contamination degree 7, 3
- If biological mesh unavailable: polyglactin mesh or open wound management with delayed repair are alternatives 7, 3
Technical Advantages of Open Preperitoneal Approach
Operative Benefits
- Covers all potential defects (direct, indirect, femoral) with single mesh piece 6
- Avoids previously scarred anterior tissue planes in recurrent cases 5, 6
- Easier learning curve compared to laparoscopic techniques 4
- No risk of intra-abdominal complications from trocar placement 4
Postoperative Outcomes
- Overall complication rate of 8.4%, primarily minor (superficial wound infections, seroma, urinary retention) 4
- No chronic pain or testicular complications in long-term follow-up 4
- Lower final pain scores compared to anterior approaches 6
- Particularly effective for complex multirecurrent hernias 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never delay repair of strangulated hernias beyond 24 hours, as this significantly increases mortality rates 2
- Do not use tissue repair alone in any clean or clean-contaminated field—synthetic mesh reduces recurrence from 19% to 0% 1, 3
- Avoid anterior approaches for recurrent hernias after previous anterior repair, as this increases complications and recurrence rates 5, 6
- Do not use synthetic mesh in contaminated/dirty fields with small defects—primary repair is safer 7, 3
- Femoral hernias carry 8-fold higher risk of bowel resection and should be treated urgently 2