Oxygen Concentrators vs. Oxygen Tanks for Home Oxygen Therapy
For patients requiring long-term supplemental oxygen at home, oxygen concentrators are the preferred option for flow rates of 4 L/min or less, while oxygen tanks (cylinders) should be reserved for ambulatory use or as backup systems. 1, 2
Primary Recommendation for Stationary Home Use
- Oxygen concentrators should be the standard delivery system for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) at home when patients require flow rates ≤4 L/min 1, 2
- Concentrators are more cost-effective than cylinders, with studies showing 75% cost savings (0.17 vs 0.79 US cents per liter) 3
- They eliminate logistical supply chain problems inherent to cylinder delivery systems, particularly important in areas where cylinder supplies are unreliable 4
- Concentrators require only an electrical power source (<400W), which can be provided by standard electricity, generators, or solar/wind systems 3
When to Use Oxygen Tanks Instead
- Portable cylinders are indicated for ambulatory oxygen therapy to allow patients to maintain mobility outside the home 1, 2
- Cylinders provide approximately 2 hours of use at 2 L/min flow rate 1
- They serve as essential backup systems when concentrators malfunction or during power outages 1
- For patients requiring high flow rates (>4 L/min), cylinders may be necessary as concentrators become less efficient at higher flows 1, 2
Critical Technical Considerations
Oxygen Concentration Differences
- Concentrators deliver lower oxygen concentrations than piped or cylinder oxygen at equivalent flow rates 5
- At 2-5 L/min flow rates, concentrators maintain >80% oxygen concentration, compared to nearly 100% from cylinders 3
- This difference means patients assessed on hospital piped oxygen may require higher flow rates when switched to home concentrators 5
- Blood gas measurements must be repeated with the actual home concentrator to ensure adequate oxygenation (target PaO2 >8 kPa or 60 mmHg) 1
Device Selection Algorithm
- For stationary home use requiring ≤4 L/min: Use oxygen concentrator as primary source 1, 2
- For mobility needs: Provide portable cylinders or oxygen-conserving devices 1, 2
- For flow rates >4 L/min: Consider cylinders or liquid oxygen systems (where available) 1, 2
- For patients with cognitive impairment or high respiratory rates: Consider Venturi mask systems with concentrators to ensure accurate oxygen delivery 1, 2
Delivery Interface Recommendations
- Nasal cannulae are the first-choice delivery device for both concentrators and cylinders 1, 2
- Venturi masks provide more accurate oxygen concentration and should be used for patients at risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure 1, 2
- Oxygen-conserving devices can extend cylinder duration for ambulatory patients requiring high flows 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never prescribe over-the-counter portable oxygen concentrators without FDA clearance, as studies show many fail to provide adequate oxygenation 6
- Do not assume concentrator settings established in hospital will translate directly to home use—formal reassessment is mandatory 5
- Avoid prescribing humidification for non-tracheostomy patients, as it provides no benefit and increases infection risk 1, 2
- Ensure patients understand fire safety: no smoking, no open flames, and keep oxygen sources away from heat sources 1
Monitoring Requirements
- Six-monthly follow-up with home visits by respiratory healthcare workers is essential to assess equipment function and patient compliance 1, 2
- Arterial blood gases should be rechecked annually to adjust flow rates as disease progresses 1
- Patients must use oxygen for minimum 15 hours daily (including sleep) to achieve mortality benefit 1, 2
Special Populations
For patients with chronic lung disease requiring ambulatory oxygen, demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) can be considered, but 20% of patients show clinically significant desaturation (≥4% drop) with DODS compared to continuous flow 7. Individual testing is mandatory before prescribing DODS devices 7.