What are the different types of laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) available for use in patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Laryngeal Mask Airways (LMAs)

Classification by Generation

LMAs are fundamentally divided into first-generation and second-generation devices, with second-generation devices strongly preferred in critical care and emergency settings due to superior oropharyngeal seal pressures and gastric drainage capabilities. 1

First-Generation LMAs

  • Classic LMA (cLMA): The original device invented by Dr. Archie Brain in 1983, consisting of a silicone rubber tube connected to a miniature silicone mask with an inflatable elliptical cuff 2, 3
  • LMA-Unique: A single-use PVC version of the classic LMA with similar clinical performance, requiring less cuff inflation volume 4
  • These devices lack gastric drainage channels and have lower oropharyngeal seal pressures, making them less suitable for critical situations 1

Second-Generation LMAs

Second-generation supraglottic airways are mandatory for critical care due to their higher oropharyngeal seal pressures and reduced risk of gastric inflation. 1

  • ProSeal LMA (PLMA): Offers the highest oropharyngeal seal pressure among second-generation devices and includes a gastric drainage tube for enhanced airway separation 2, 1
  • LMA Supreme: Provides high seal pressure (second to ProSeal) with integrated gastric access and a rigid curved airway tube 1
  • i-gel: A cuffless supraglottic airway with anatomical design, offering good seal pressure (third among second-generation devices) 1

Specialized LMA Types

Intubating LMAs

  • LMA Fastrach (Intubating LMA): Specifically designed to facilitate blind or fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation, with a rigid curved shaft and epiglottic elevating bar 2
  • LMA CTrach: Features integrated video capability for visualized intubation through the device, showing reduced cervical spine movement compared to direct laryngoscopy 2
  • These devices allow passage of a 6.0-mm internal diameter endotracheal tube over an intubating stylet or pediatric fiberoptic bronchoscope 3

Clinical Context for Device Selection

Critical Care and Emergency Settings

For airway rescue in critically ill adults and emergency situations, use second-generation supraglottic airways (ProSeal LMA, LMA Supreme, or i-gel), with ProSeal offering the highest seal pressure. 1

  • Device-specific training is essential and should receive the same emphasis as tracheal intubation training 1
  • Limit insertion attempts to one optimal attempt or maximum three attempts before declaring failure 1
  • Never apply cricoid pressure during insertion as it impairs placement and ventilation 1

Cardiac Arrest

  • The American Heart Association recommends supraglottic airways like LMAs as reasonable alternatives to bag-mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation during CPR, particularly in out-of-hospital settings with low intubation success rates 2, 5
  • Either first or second-generation devices may be used, though second-generation devices are preferable when available 1

Cervical Spine Injury

  • No specific LMA type is clearly superior for reducing cervical spine movement or achieving successful intubation 2
  • Clinicians should use devices familiar to them rather than selecting based solely on cervical spine considerations 2
  • Second-generation SADs should be considered in preference to first-generation devices even in this context 2

Key Clinical Considerations

Contraindications

  • All LMA types are contraindicated when patients are at risk for pulmonary aspiration (full stomach, emergency cases) 3, 6
  • LMAs do not guarantee protection against aspiration and are not substitutes for properly placed endotracheal tubes in high-risk situations 3, 6

Advantages Over Face Mask

  • Better airway control with minimal gas leakage 6
  • Frees the anaesthetist's hands as no mandibular support is needed 6
  • Less hemodynamically stressful than endotracheal intubation 3
  • Secure airway during patient transport 6

Success Rates

  • The classic LMA achieved 99.8% success rates in early studies, with insertion successful in 85% on first attempt 2, 4
  • By 2011, supraglottic airway devices were being used in 56.2% of general anaesthetics 2

References

Guideline

Recommended Type of Laryngeal Mask Airway for Critically Ill Adults

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Airway Management with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and Endotracheal Tube (ETT)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The use of a laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing patients.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1990

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.