AMH Levels in Endometriosis
Women with endometriosis have significantly reduced AMH levels compared to those without the disease, with the most severe reductions occurring in patients with ovarian endometriomas and those who have undergone prior endometrioma surgery. 1, 2, 3
Impact of Endometriosis on Ovarian Reserve
Disease-Related AMH Reduction
Women with stage III-IV endometriosis demonstrate mean AMH levels of 0.97 ± 0.59 ng/ml compared to 1.72 ± 0.63 ng/ml in fertile controls (p=0.001), representing a 44% reduction. 2 This represents incipient ovarian failure and early ovarian depletion in young women.
Laparoscopically-confirmed endometriosis is associated with 29.6% lower AMH levels (95% CI: -45.4%, -9.2%) compared to women without endometriosis. 3 This reduction is more pronounced in women with BMI ≥25 kg/m² (44% reduction) versus BMI <25 kg/m² (19.8% reduction). 3
The detrimental effect of endometriosis on AMH is age-dependent and becomes statistically significant only in women aged 35 years or older, suggesting an age-enhancement effect. 4
Phenotype-Specific Effects
Ovarian endometriomas (OMAs) are the primary driver of reduced AMH levels in endometriosis patients. 1 The evidence shows:
OMA is linked to reduced AMH values and a higher AMH decline rate over time, even before surgical intervention. 1
Superficial peritoneal endometriosis has little to no impact on AMH levels. 1
Deep infiltrating endometriosis reduces AMH levels, though the mechanism may involve extra-ovarian factors beyond simple follicular depletion. 1
Surgical Impact on AMH
Prior endometrioma surgery is the strongest predictor of diminished AMH levels in endometriosis patients, independent of current disease presence. 5
Women with previous OMA surgery have significantly lower AMH levels regardless of whether endometriomas are currently present (OR = 3.0 for AMH <1 ng/ml, 95% CI: 1.4-6.41, p=0.01). 5
OMA cystectomy causes further AMH reduction beyond the disease effect itself, though AMH tends to recover partially postoperatively. 1
Non-excisional surgery for OMA (drainage/ablation) spares more ovarian parenchyma and causes smaller AMH declines than cystectomy, though at least temporary reduction still occurs. 1
Non-thermal hemostasis methods following cystectomy are superior to thermal methods in terms of preserving AMH levels. 1
Clinical Utility of AMH Assessment
Ovarian Reserve Evaluation
AMH correlates well with antral follicle count (AFC) and is superior to age, basal FSH, estradiol, and inhibin B for assessing ovarian reserve in healthy women. 6 Key advantages include:
AMH does not vary significantly by menstrual cycle day and is not affected by exogenous estrogen or progesterone use. 6
AMH is inversely correlated with age in women ≥25 years, making it clinically useful in this population. 7
Very low AMH levels (<0.7 ng/ml) indicate incipient ovarian insufficiency and represent the best endocrine marker for age-related decline in ovarian reserve. 8
Fertility Implications
Preoperative AMH levels in endometriosis patients are positively correlated with postoperative probability of pregnancy, particularly spontaneous conception, though not necessarily live birth rates. 1
Preoperative AMH is predictive of the risk of developing diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) after surgery. 1
Postoperative AMH levels and the rate of AMH decline at 1 year after OMA cystectomy predict fertility outcomes. 1
Women with severely low AMH (<0.7 ng/ml) face 91% increased odds of miscarriage (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.40-2.60). 8
In women ≥35 years, low AMH confers 85% increased miscarriage risk (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.35-2.52). 8
Clinical Management Algorithm
Assessment Strategy
Measure AMH levels in all reproductive-age women with diagnosed or suspected endometriosis to establish baseline ovarian reserve. 6, 2
Interpret AMH values in context of age (most reliable in women ≥25 years), BMI, and endometriosis phenotype. 7, 3, 4
For women with irregular menses and low AMH, monitor for symptoms of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). 8
Obtain FSH and estradiol levels in women with suspected diminished ovarian reserve (AMH <1 ng/ml). 8
Surgical Decision-Making
The finding that OMA surgery—not endometriomas per se—causes the most significant AMH reduction should heavily influence surgical decision-making in women desiring future pregnancy. 5
Consider non-excisional approaches (drainage/ablation) over cystectomy when fertility preservation is paramount, particularly in women with already reduced AMH or bilateral disease. 1
If cystectomy is necessary, employ non-thermal hemostasis techniques to minimize ovarian damage. 1
Fertility Counseling
Counsel all women with endometriosis about their elevated risk of premature ovarian failure and the importance of not delaying childbearing. 6, 3
Women with AMH <1 ng/ml should pursue fertility evaluation and attempts promptly per American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendations. 8
Discuss fertility preservation options (oocyte cryopreservation) before any planned endometrioma surgery, especially in women with low baseline AMH. 6
Refer to reproductive endocrinology for infertility evaluation and assisted reproduction consultation when AMH indicates diminished reserve. 6
Important Caveats
Different AMH assays yield varying results due to lack of international standardization, so interpret values within the specific laboratory's reference ranges. 8, 7
A reduction in AMH values following deep endometriosis surgery should not automatically be interpreted as decline in reproductive potential, as extra-ovarian factors may be involved. 1
AMH shows promise for predicting timing of menopause onset in endometriosis patients, which has implications for long-term cardiovascular disease risk. 6, 3