Can congenital or acquired nevi, such as port-wine stains or spider nevi, be considered in the differential diagnosis of a patient presenting with reddish-brown, telangiectatic macules and patches, associated with flushing, itching, and burning?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnosis: Nevi in Telangiectatic Skin Lesions

Telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans (TMEP), a rare form of cutaneous mastocytosis, should be added to your differential diagnosis, as it presents with reddish-brown telangiectatic macules and is associated with flushing, itching, and burning. 1

Primary Consideration: Telangiectasia Macularis Eruptiva Perstans (TMEP)

TMEP is the most relevant nevoid condition to consider in your differential diagnosis given the specific presentation of telangiectatic macules with associated symptoms. 1, 2

Clinical Features of TMEP

  • Lesion characteristics: Red telangiectatic macules with a tan or brown background 1
  • Associated symptoms: Episodic flushing, pruritus, and burning sensation 1, 2, 3
  • Age presentation: Rarely presents in childhood; more common in adults 1, 3
  • Darier's sign: Typically positive (urtication and flare upon rubbing lesions) 1

Distinguishing TMEP from Other Conditions

  • Unlike congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN): TMEP lesions are telangiectatic rather than pigmented melanocytic proliferations 1, 2
  • Unlike urticaria pigmentosa: TMEP specifically features prominent telangiectasia as the defining characteristic 1, 2
  • Can coexist with urticaria pigmentosa: Some patients may have both presentations simultaneously 1

Congenital Melanocytic Nevi: Less Likely but Consider

While CMN should be in your differential, they are less likely to match your described presentation:

Why CMN is Less Compatible

  • Color presentation: CMN typically present as shades of brown and black, though rare "amelanotic" red-pink papules can occur 1
  • Telangiectasia: Not a primary feature of CMN 1
  • Timing: CMN are present at birth or develop within the first year of life in 78-94% of cases 1
  • Associated symptoms: Pruritus is common in larger CMN, but flushing and burning are not typical features 1

CMN Subtypes to Consider (if relevant)

  • "Classic" CMN: Brown-black macules, papules, patches, or plaques 1
  • Blue nevus: Gray-blue patches or plaques due to dermal melanocytes 1
  • Nevus spilus: Brown patch with overlying darker macules 1

Port-Wine Stains: Unlikely in This Context

Acquired port-wine stains are extremely rare and do not typically present with the symptom complex you describe. 4

Why Port-Wine Stains Don't Fit

  • Symptomatology: Port-wine stains (capillary malformations) are typically asymptomatic without flushing, itching, or burning 4
  • Telangiectasia pattern: While vascular, they present as persistent red-purple patches rather than discrete telangiectatic macules 4
  • Acquired forms: Rare and often associated with trauma, not spontaneous flushing episodes 4

Spider Nevi: Not Appropriate for This Differential

Spider nevi are not relevant to this differential diagnosis as they present as central arterioles with radiating vessels, not diffuse telangiectatic macules with patches. 5

Diagnostic Workup for TMEP

If TMEP is suspected based on clinical presentation:

Essential Investigations

  • Skin biopsy: Shows increased mast cells in papillary dermis, aggregating around blood vessels 1
  • Immunostaining: Tryptase and KIT staining to confirm mast cell proliferation 1
  • Serum tryptase level: May be elevated, correlating with disease extent and symptom severity 1
  • Darier's sign testing: Rub lesion to elicit urtication and flare 1

Additional Considerations

  • Complete blood count: To evaluate for systemic involvement 1
  • Bone marrow evaluation: Consider if tryptase significantly elevated or severe systemic symptoms present 1
  • c-kit mutation analysis: Recommended in skin mast cells 1

Critical Clinical Pitfall

Do not confuse TMEP with generalized essential telangiectasia, which presents with progressive telangiectases but lacks the mast cell-mediated symptoms of flushing, pruritus, and positive Darier's sign. 6 Generalized essential telangiectasia is a diagnosis of exclusion and does not involve mast cell proliferation. 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans: a rare form of adult mastocytosis.

The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2011

Research

Telangiectasias: Small lesions referring to serious disorders.

European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society, 2017

Research

Generalized essential telangiectasia.

Dermatology online journal, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.