What is the best treatment approach for a male patient with erectile dysfunction and penile fibrosis, likely caused by intracavernosal alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) injections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Penile Fibrosis from Intracavernosal Alprostadil

For penile fibrosis caused by intracavernosal alprostadil injections, the best approach is conservative management with continued monitoring, as over half of patients (52.3%) experience spontaneous improvement without intervention, even while continuing PGE1 therapy. 1

Initial Management Strategy

Expectant Management is Preferred

  • Defer therapeutic intervention and observe for spontaneous resolution, as 25% of patients with penile fibrosis from intracavernosal PGE1 will have complete resolution of clinically detectable fibrosis without treatment 1
  • Continue regular follow-up with careful penile examination at 3-month intervals to monitor for progression or improvement 2
  • Most patients (91.3%) can safely continue intracavernosal PGE1 therapy during the observation period without worsening fibrosis 1

Clinical Monitoring Requirements

  • Examine for penile nodules, plaques, curvature, and areas of induration at each follow-up visit 2
  • Document the presence and severity of penile pain, as this does not significantly influence the likelihood of spontaneous improvement 1
  • Monitor erectile function and treatment efficacy, as fibrosis may impact response to therapy 2

Understanding the Natural History

Spontaneous Improvement is Common

  • In a follow-up study of 44 patients with penile fibrosis from PGE1 injections, 52.3% showed clinical improvement without any therapeutic intervention 1
  • The presence of penile curvature or pain at presentation does not significantly affect the likelihood of spontaneous improvement 1
  • Patient age and duration of injection therapy do not predict which patients will improve 1

Timeline for Observation

  • Follow patients for at least 24-36 months before considering interventional therapy, as improvement may occur gradually over this period 1
  • Most spontaneous improvement occurs during continued use of intracavernosal therapy, not after discontinuation 1

Alternative Treatment Options if Fibrosis Progresses

Switch to Alternative ED Therapies

  • Transition to PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil) as first-line therapy if the patient has not already failed these agents 3
  • Consider intraurethral alprostadil, which does not list fibrosis among its adverse effects and avoids direct corporal trauma 3, 4
  • Vacuum erection devices (VED) with vacuum limiters are an option that avoids further penile trauma, though patients should be counseled about minor adverse effects like petechiae and discomfort 3

Modify Injection Technique if Continuing ICI

  • Ensure proper injection technique through retraining, as improper technique increases treatment failure and complications 2, 5
  • Consider dose reduction to the minimal effective dose, as higher doses may increase adverse effects 2
  • Rotate injection sites to avoid repeated trauma to the same area 2

When Surgical Intervention May Be Considered

Penile Prosthesis for Refractory Cases

  • If erectile dysfunction becomes refractory to medical management and fibrosis significantly impairs quality of life, penile prosthesis implantation may be considered 3
  • Patients must be counseled regarding post-operative expectations, including potential complications such as infection, device malfunction, and the irreversible nature of the procedure 3
  • Surgery should not be performed in the presence of active infection (systemic, cutaneous, or urinary tract) 3

Critical Distinction: Fibrosis vs. Priapism-Related Damage

Alprostadil Carries Lower Fibrosis Risk

  • Alprostadil alone is actually less prone to cause ischemic priapism compared to papaverine and phentolamine combinations, which counteract normal detumescence pathways 4
  • The reported incidence of penile fibrosis with intracavernosal alprostadil ranges from <1% to more than 20%, but this is significantly lower than with other agents like papaverine 4, 6
  • Corporal fibrosis leading to penile shortening results from untreated ischemic priapism (>36 hours), not from alprostadil itself 4

Prevention of Future Fibrosis

  • Ensure patients understand priapism warning signs and have a clear action plan for erections lasting ≥4 hours 2, 5
  • For prolonged erections <4 hours, intracavernosal phenylephrine is the initial treatment to prevent progression to ischemic priapism 3, 2
  • Monitor blood pressure and heart rate during phenylephrine administration, especially in patients with cardiovascular disease 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rush to surgical or aggressive interventions, as spontaneous improvement is common and occurs in over half of patients 1
  • Do not automatically discontinue intracavernosal therapy, as continued use does not prevent spontaneous improvement and may be necessary for erectile function 1
  • Do not assume all penile fibrosis is permanent, as 25% of patients will have complete resolution without intervention 1
  • Avoid switching to papaverine-based combinations, which carry higher risks of priapism and fibrosis than alprostadil monotherapy 4, 6

References

Guideline

Initial Approach to Intracavernous Injection Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Alprostadil and Penile Fibrosis Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Tri-Mix Treatment Protocol for Erectile Dysfunction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Erectile dysfunction.

The Medical journal of Australia, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.