What is the approach for risk stratification and management of a patient with suspected aortic dissection, considering their age, medical history, and clinical presentation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk Stratification for Aortic Dissection

Do not rely on clinical decision rules alone to identify low-risk patients with suspected aortic dissection, as even patients with an ADD score of 0 still have a 4-6% risk of dissection. 1

Clinical Risk Assessment Framework

High-Risk Predisposing Conditions

Assess for the following conditions that significantly increase dissection risk: 1, 2

  • Marfan syndrome or other connective tissue disorders (Loeys-Dietz, Ehlers-Danlos) 1, 3
  • Family history of aortic disease 1
  • Known aortic valve disease (particularly bicuspid aortic valve) 1, 3
  • Recent aortic manipulation (catheterization, cardiac surgery) 1
  • Known thoracic aortic aneurysm 1
  • History of hypertension (greatest population attributable risk) 2, 3

High-Risk Pain Features

Evaluate pain characteristics systematically: 1, 2

  • Abrupt onset (present in 84% of cases) 2
  • Severe intensity (present in 90% of cases) 2
  • Tearing or ripping quality (though only 51-64% describe it this way) 2
  • Location: Chest pain (80% of Type A), back pain (64% of Type B, 47% of Type A), or abdominal pain (21% Type A, 43% Type B) 2
  • Migrating quality (12-55% of cases as dissection extends) 2

High-Risk Examination Features

Perform focused examination for: 1, 4

  • Pulse deficit (absent or diminished peripheral pulses) 1
  • Systolic blood pressure differential >20 mmHg between arms (measure both arms sequentially) 1, 4
  • Focal neurologic deficit with pain 1, 2
  • New or unknown murmur of aortic insufficiency 1, 2
  • Hypotension or shock 1

The ADD Risk Score Algorithm

Calculate the ADD score (0-3) based on number of risk categories where ≥1 high-risk marker is present: 1, 5

ADD Score Interpretation:

  • ADD Score = 0: 4.3-5.9% risk of dissection 1, 5
  • ADD Score = 1: 27.3% risk of dissection 5
  • ADD Score ≥2: 39.1% risk of dissection 5

Critical Limitation: An ADD score of 0 has a negative likelihood ratio of only 0.22 (95% CI 0.15-0.33), which is insufficient to exclude dissection. 1, 2 Even among 439 patients with ADD score 0,26 (5.9%) had confirmed dissection. 1, 5

Adjunctive Risk Stratification Tools

D-dimer Testing

D-dimer >0.5 µg/mL has high sensitivity (91-100%) but should never be used alone to rule out dissection: 1, 2

False-negative D-dimer occurs in: 1

  • Chronic dissections (>2 weeks from symptom onset) 1
  • Thrombosed false lumen 1
  • Intramural hematoma without intimal flap 1
  • Short dissection length 1
  • Young patients 1
  • Early presentation (<4 hours from symptom onset) 1

Chest Radiograph

Mediastinal or aortic widening is present in only 62.6% of Type A and 56% of Type B dissections. 6 Among patients with ADD score 0 and dissection, 48.6% had widened mediastinum on chest X-ray. 1 A normal chest X-ray does not exclude dissection. 6

Clinical Triad (von Kodolitsch)

The absence of all three features yields only a 7% probability of dissection (LR- 0.07-0.17), but 4% of patients with none of these features still had dissection: 1

  1. Aortic pain with sudden onset and/or tearing/ripping quality
  2. Mediastinal/aortic widening on chest radiograph
  3. Pulse differential or blood pressure differential >20 mmHg

Special Populations Requiring Lower Threshold

Painless Presentations (6.4% of cases)

Consider dissection in patients presenting with: 2

  • Syncope (up to 20% of cases) 2
  • Stroke or focal neurologic deficits 2
  • Acute heart failure from aortic regurgitation 2
  • Limb ischemia 2

Higher risk for painless presentation: 2

  • Older patients
  • Patients on chronic steroids
  • Marfan syndrome patients

Women

Women with dissection are: 2

  • Older at presentation
  • Less likely to present within 6 hours
  • Have higher in-hospital mortality (30% vs 21% in men)
  • More commonly present with altered mental status

Recommended Approach

For any patient with clinical suspicion (regardless of ADD score): 1

  1. Measure blood pressure in both arms (use higher reading for monitoring) 4
  2. Obtain D-dimer if available, but do not use negative result to exclude dissection 1
  3. Proceed directly to CT angiography if clinical suspicion persists, even with ADD score 0 or negative D-dimer 1, 6
  4. Do not use bedside TTE alone to definitively establish or exclude diagnosis (Level B recommendation) 1
  5. Initiate immediate surgical consultation or transfer if imaging suggests dissection 1

The decision to pursue advanced imaging must remain at the treating physician's discretion and should not be deferred based on clinical decision rules alone. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Aortic Dissection Presentation and Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Clinical Significance of Inter-arm Blood Pressure Differences in Aortic Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Aortic Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.