How should Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) data be interpreted in a clinical setting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

NIRS Interpretation in Clinical Settings

Context-Dependent Applications

NIRS interpretation depends critically on the clinical context, with distinct applications in cardiovascular interventions, neurocritical care, and resuscitation, each requiring different interpretive frameworks.


Cardiovascular/Intravascular Imaging

Technical Principles

  • NIRS uses near-infrared light (wavelengths 800-2,500 nm) to characterize chemical composition of tissues based on differential light absorption 1
  • The system comprises a scanning near-infrared laser, pullback/rotation unit, and IVUS-sized catheter 1
  • Software analyzes spectral data and produces a color-coded chemogram representing tissue chemical composition 1

Clinical Interpretation

  • Primary use: quantify and qualify lipid distribution in coronary plaques, expressed as lipid core burden index 1
  • Critical threshold: lipid content with plaque burden >70% is associated with greater incidence of non-culprit lesion events 1
  • The chemogram provides spatial mapping of lipid-rich plaque along the vessel length 1
  • NIRS is typically combined with IVUS for complementary structural and compositional assessment 1

Neurocritical Care Monitoring

Brain Tissue Oxygenation

  • Normal PbtO2 is 23-35 mmHg; values <20 mmHg represent compromised brain oxygen requiring intervention 1
  • PbtO2 thresholds should be interpreted based on probe location identified on post-insertion CT 1
  • PbtO2 is not simply a marker of ischemia or CBF—it reflects the balance of oxygen delivery and consumption 1
  • Monitoring is safe and provides accurate data for up to 10 days with measurable responses to interventions 1

Jugular Venous Oximetry

  • Normal SjvO2 is 55-75%; values <55% indicate cerebral ischemia 1
  • SjvO2 can detect both ischemia and hyperemia, unlike PbtO2 1
  • Regional abnormalities may not be detected even with normal SjvO2 values 1
  • Positioning, catheter clot formation, and poor sampling technique frequently cause errors, making SjvO2 less reliable than PbtO2 1

NIRS in Neurocritical Care

  • NIRS has several limitations in adult neurocritical care with conflicting results about clinical utility 1
  • Small observational studies show inconsistent correlations with cerebral perfusion, vasospasm, and MAP/CPP changes 1
  • No studies demonstrate that NIRS data alone can influence outcomes in adult neurocritical care 1

Recommendations for Neurocritical Care

  • Strongly recommend monitoring brain oxygen using PbtO2 or SjvO2 in patients with or at risk of cerebral ischemia/hypoxia 1
  • Probe location should depend on diagnosis, lesion type/location, and technical feasibility 1
  • Use brain oxygen monitors with clinical indicators and other monitoring modalities for accurate prognostication 1
  • Brain oxygen monitoring can assist in titrating therapies, identifying refractory intracranial hypertension, and managing delayed cerebral ischemia 1

Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation

Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

  • NIRS measures regional cerebral and renal/mesenteric oxygen saturation (rScO2) noninvasively, even in no-flow states 1
  • Sensors are placed on the forehead (cerebral rScO2) and abdomen, containing light source and fiberoptic bundles detecting absorption/reflection at different tissue depths 1

Evidence Base

  • No pediatric RCTs exist evaluating NIRS-guided CPR 1, 2
  • Adult systematic reviews show higher rScO2 associates with higher likelihood of ROSC and survival; lower rScO2 associates with increased mortality 1, 2
  • No consensus exists on specific predictive threshold values for rScO2 1
  • Trend of rising rScO2 (7-15% from baseline) may be more reliable than absolute values for predicting ROSC 1, 2

Current Recommendations

  • The Pediatric Life Support Task Force states confidence in effect estimates is too low to make any treatment recommendation 1, 2
  • For children with in-hospital cardiac arrest and existing arterial line, hemodynamic-directed CPR might be considered, but more evidence is required 1, 2
  • The 2020 guidelines make no treatment recommendation for NIRS during pediatric resuscitation 2

Adult Cardiac Arrest

  • Higher cerebral oxygen saturation measured with NIRS associates with higher chance of ROSC and survival 1
  • Lower NIRS values associate with increased mortality 1
  • Wide overlap exists in mean/median cerebral oxygen saturation values between patients with and without ROSC 1
  • Many different NIRS devices with non-interchangeable saturation indices complicate comparisons 1
  • No treatment recommendation exists for any particular physiological measure to guide CPR because available evidence makes effect estimates speculative 1

Cardiac Surgery Applications

Intraoperative Monitoring

  • NIRS-guided algorithms to improve clinical outcomes may be considered (Class IIb, Level B recommendation) 1
  • Multiple randomized controlled studies showed no clinical benefit of NIRS-based algorithms, contradicting earlier evidence 1
  • The evidence remains mixed regarding routine use during cardiopulmonary bypass 1

Common Pitfalls and Limitations

Technical Limitations

  • NIRS provides global index of cerebral cortex reactivities with low spatial resolution 3
  • Contaminating signals from skin and skull can affect measurements 3
  • Multiple device types with non-standardized outputs complicate interpretation 1
  • Blood clearance not required (unlike OCT), but tissue penetration is limited 1

Clinical Interpretation Errors

  • Relying on absolute threshold values rather than trends during resuscitation 1
  • Ignoring probe location when interpreting PbtO2 values 1
  • Assuming normal SjvO2 excludes regional ischemia 1
  • Using NIRS data in isolation without integrating other clinical indicators 1

Context-Specific Considerations

  • In coronary imaging: NIRS identifies lipid-rich plaque but requires IVUS for structural detail 1
  • In neurocritical care: PbtO2 is more reliable than SjvO2 due to fewer technical errors 1
  • In resuscitation: Trending rScO2 changes more predictive than single measurements 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Role of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Pediatric Care

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.