Diagnosis of Symptomatic Bradycardia
A comprehensive history and physical examination combined with a 12-lead ECG forms the foundation for diagnosing symptomatic bradycardia, with the primary goal of establishing symptom-rhythm correlation and identifying reversible causes before considering permanent pacing. 1
Initial Clinical Assessment
History Taking
The history must capture specific details about symptom characteristics and potential triggers 1:
- Symptom characteristics: Document frequency, timing, duration, severity, and circumstances of syncope, presyncope, dizziness, lightheadedness, heart failure symptoms, or confusional states 1
- Medication review: Thoroughly review all prescription and over-the-counter medications, particularly beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, digoxin, and antiarrhythmic drugs 1, 2
- Trigger identification: Assess relationship to meals, physical exertion, positional changes, urination, defecation, cough, prolonged standing, shaving, tight collars, and head turning 1
- Cardiovascular risk factors: Complete cardiovascular risk assessment, family history, and travel history 1
Physical Examination
The physical examination should identify signs of structural heart disease and systemic illness that may manifest as bradycardia 1.
Electrocardiographic Evaluation
12-Lead ECG
A 12-lead ECG is essential and should be obtained in all patients with suspected bradycardia 1, 2:
- Diagnostic yield: Provides definitive diagnosis in only approximately 5% of syncope cases, but abnormal findings predict adverse outcomes and indicate underlying structural heart disease 1
- Key findings to document: Rhythm and rate, nature and extent of conduction disturbance, left ventricular hypertrophy, diagnostic Q waves, prolonged corrected QT interval, and findings suggestive of hyperkalemia 1
- Prognostic value: An abnormal initial ECG is associated with increased all-cause mortality at 1 year in patients presenting with syncope 1
Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring
The type of monitoring should be selected based on symptom frequency 1, 2:
- Holter monitor (24-72 hours): For patients with frequent daily symptoms 2
- Event recorder or mobile cardiac telemetry: For symptoms occurring weekly to monthly 2
- Implantable cardiac monitor (ICM): Reasonable for patients with infrequent symptoms occurring >30 days apart when initial noninvasive evaluation is nondiagnostic 1, 2
The ICM strategy has proven more effective than conventional testing (24-hour ambulatory monitoring, 12-lead ECG, treadmill stress test) in obtaining a clinical diagnosis, with many conditions found to be bradycardia-mediated including high-grade atrioventricular block, sinus node dysfunction, and neurocardiogenic syncope 1.
Laboratory and Imaging Studies
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory tests should be ordered based on clinical suspicion for specific underlying causes 1, 2:
- Thyroid function tests: To evaluate for hypothyroidism 1, 2
- Electrolytes: Particularly potassium, calcium, and magnesium 1, 2
- pH assessment: To detect acidosis 1, 2
- Lyme titer: When clinically indicated based on exposure history 1, 2
- Cardiac biomarkers: If acute myocardial infarction is suspected 2
Cardiac Imaging
Transthoracic echocardiography is reasonable when structural heart disease is suspected 1:
- Indications: Patients with left bundle branch block, suspected cardiomyopathy, valvular disease, or congenital anomalies 1
- Prognostic value: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and ejection fraction predict adverse cardiac events in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction 1
- Not indicated: Routine cardiac imaging is not indicated in asymptomatic sinus bradycardia or first-degree atrioventricular block without clinical evidence of structural heart disease 1
Disease-specific advanced imaging (transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac MRI, CT, or nuclear imaging) is reasonable in selected patients when structural heart disease is suspected but not confirmed by other modalities 1.
Electrophysiology Study
An electrophysiology study may be considered in selected patients when initial noninvasive evaluation is nondiagnostic 1:
- Patient selection: Almost exclusively examined in patients with syncope or presyncope, particularly those with structural heart disease or baseline ECG abnormalities (bundle branch block, prior MI) 1
- Diagnostic yield: Varies widely (12%-80%) depending on patient population, with higher yield in patients with history of heart disease 1
- Role: Generally an adjunctive tool, not first-line diagnostic assessment 1
- Procedural safety: Well tolerated with minimal risk of serious complications 1
Evaluation for Reversible Causes
Before considering permanent pacing, evaluation and treatment of reversible causes is mandatory 1, 2:
Common Reversible Causes to Evaluate
- Medications: Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, antiarrhythmic drugs, lithium 1, 2
- Metabolic: Hyperkalemia, hypokalemia, hypoglycemia, hypothyroidism 1, 2
- Cardiac: Acute myocardial ischemia/infarction, cardiac surgery 1, 2
- Infectious: Lyme disease, viral infections 1
- Other: Hypothermia, obstructive sleep apnea, hypoxemia, hypercarbia, elevated intracranial pressure 1, 2
Clinical Pitfalls
- Symptom correlation challenge: Direct attribution of bradycardia as the sole source of symptoms is difficult, particularly in vasovagal syncope where bradycardia is often accompanied by significant vasodepressor effect 1
- Nonspecific symptoms: Fatigue can be multifactorial and difficult to correlate with modest resting sinus bradycardia 1
- Timing of ECG: Unless the patient is symptomatic or bradycardic at the time of recording, the 12-lead ECG will not provide rhythm correlation with symptoms 1
- Heart transplant patients: Atropine should not be used in heart transplant patients without evidence of autonomic reinnervation 1, 2