Assessment of Distal Femoral Deformity and Surgical Indication
The reported angles (MPTA 88.5° and LDFA 83.5°) indicate significant distal femoral varus deformity requiring surgical correction, and a distal femur osteotomy with autogenous bone grafting is recommended based on current orthopedic guidelines.
Understanding the Deformity
Your measurements reveal:
- Mechanical Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA): 88.5° - This is within normal range (normal: 85-90°) 1
- Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA): 83.5° - This is significantly abnormal (normal: 85-90°), indicating distal femoral varus deformity 2, 1
The primary pathology localizes to the distal femur, not the tibia, based on these measurements 1.
Surgical Indication and Approach
Double-level osteotomy considerations:
- The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons recommends that when MPTA <85° AND LDFA abnormalities coexist, double-level osteotomy is indicated to avoid creating excessive tibial valgus and joint line obliquity 2
- In your case, since MPTA is normal (88.5°) but LDFA is abnormal (83.5°), single-level distal femoral osteotomy is appropriate 2, 1
Bidirectional osteotomy:
- The term "complex bidirectional osteotomy" typically refers to correction in multiple planes (coronal and sagittal) 3
- If only coronal plane deformity exists, a standard opening or closing wedge osteotomy may suffice 1
- Assessment of sagittal plane alignment is essential before determining if bidirectional correction is needed 1, 4
Bone Grafting Recommendations
Autogenous bone grafting is strongly recommended:
- The International Journal of Surgery consensus guidelines recommend sufficient autogenous bone graft for osteotomy procedures, particularly opening wedge corrections 2, 5
- Iliac crest bone graft provides optimal structural support for complex corrections 2
- For opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy, bone grafting enhances union rates and prevents collapse 5
Fixation Strategy
Combined fixation approach:
- External fixation combined with internal fixation is recommended for stability in complex deformity corrections 2, 5
- This combination achieves primary union rates of 84% and final union rates of 93.3% 5
- The combined approach is particularly indicated for significant angular deformities requiring precise correction 5
Critical Considerations
Before proceeding:
- Obtain full-length standing radiographs to assess mechanical axis deviation and joint line obliquity 1, 6
- Evaluate for sagittal plane deformities (procurvatum/recurvatum) that may require bidirectional correction 1, 4
- Assess the contralateral limb for comparison and to determine if bilateral pathology exists 6
- Consider CT imaging for precise three-dimensional deformity analysis and surgical planning 4
Common pitfalls to avoid:
- Correcting only the distal femur when joint line obliquity exceeds acceptable limits (>10°) may require tibial correction as well 2
- Inadequate bone grafting in opening wedge osteotomies leads to delayed union or nonunion 5, 2
- Failure to address rotational deformities simultaneously can result in persistent functional impairment 1, 3