What types of sutures are used for different surgical procedures and patient populations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Suture Selection Guide for Surgical Procedures

Primary Recommendation for Fascial/Abdominal Closure

Use slowly absorbable monofilament sutures (such as 4-0 poliglecaprone or polyglactin) with a continuous "small bite" technique, maintaining a suture-to-wound length ratio of at least 4:1. 1

Fascial Closure Technique Specifications

  • Small bite technique: Place stitches 5mm from the wound edge and 5mm between stitches, including only the aponeurosis (not fat or muscle) 1
  • Suture-to-wound ratio: Document and maintain a 4:1 ratio or higher to reduce incisional hernia and wound complications 1
  • Material choice: Slowly absorbable monofilament sutures retain 50-75% tensile strength after 1 week, providing extended wound support 1, 2
  • Avoid rapidly absorbable sutures: These significantly increase incisional hernia rates compared to slowly absorbable materials 1

Why Monofilament Over Multifilament

  • Monofilament sutures reduce bacterial seeding and infection risk compared to braided multifilament materials 2, 3
  • No significant difference exists between monofilament and multifilament for incisional hernia rates when proper technique is used, but infection risk favors monofilament 1

Skin Closure Recommendations

Use continuous subcuticular sutures with slowly absorbable monofilament material (4-0 poliglecaprone or polyglactin) for optimal outcomes. 1, 2

Evidence for Continuous vs Interrupted Technique

  • Continuous subcuticular sutures reduce superficial wound dehiscence by 92% (RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02-0.35) compared to interrupted sutures 1, 2
  • No difference in surgical site infection rates between techniques (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.40-1.33) 1
  • Continuous technique requires less operative time and eliminates need for suture removal 2
  • The dramatic reduction in dehiscence occurs because absorbable continuous sutures provide prolonged support without requiring removal at 7-9 days 1, 2

When to Use Interrupted Sutures

  • High-tension wounds where individual stitch adjustment is needed 2
  • Contaminated wounds where selective stitch removal may be necessary 4
  • Facial wounds requiring precise edge approximation: use 5-0 or 6-0 monofilament non-absorbable sutures, remove at 5-7 days 4

Antimicrobial-Coated Sutures

Use triclosan-coated sutures for abdominal and colorectal surgery to reduce surgical site infections. 1

Specific Evidence by Suture Type

  • Triclosan-coated Vicryl: Significantly reduces SSI (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.98) across all wound classes 1
  • Triclosan-coated PDS: No significant effect on SSI rates (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.61-1.17) 1
  • Overall SSI reduction with triclosan-coated sutures: OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.59-0.88) 1

When Antimicrobial Coating Provides Benefit

  • Clean-contaminated wounds (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.44-0.98) 1
  • Colorectal surgeries (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.98) 1
  • Abdominal surgeries with prophylactic antibiotics (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99) 1
  • Emergency laparotomies including contaminated/dirty wounds 1

Where Antimicrobial Coating Shows No Benefit

  • Cardiac surgery 1
  • Breast surgery 1
  • Procedures without prophylactic antibiotics 1

Tissue Adhesives vs Sutures

Sutures are mandatory for most wound closures; tissue adhesives carry unacceptable dehiscence risk. 2

Critical Evidence Against Tissue Adhesives

  • Tissue adhesives have 3.35 times higher risk of wound breakdown (RR 3.35; 95% CI 1.53-7.33) 1, 2
  • Number needed to harm: treating 43 patients with adhesives instead of sutures causes one additional dehiscence 2
  • No difference in infection rates, patient satisfaction, or cost between methods 1

Absolute Contraindications for Tissue Adhesives

  • High-tension wounds 2
  • Emergency laparotomy or abdominal wall closures 2
  • Contaminated or infection-prone wounds 2
  • Any wound requiring mechanical support for healing 2

Limited Acceptable Use

  • Low-tension superficial lacerations where speed is prioritized over reliability 1
  • Adjunct to sutures in select cases, never as sole closure method 2

Suture Removal Timing

Remove non-absorbable sutures at specific intervals based on anatomic location to prevent both premature dehiscence and excessive scarring. 4

Location-Specific Timing

  • Facial wounds: 5-7 days 4
  • Scalp and trunk: 7-9 days 1, 4
  • Extremities: 10-14 days (longer for lower extremities) 4
  • High-tension areas: Consider delayed removal or use absorbable sutures instead 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Technical Errors

  • Never include fat or muscle in fascial closure: This causes tissue compression, devitalization, and increased hernia risk 1
  • Avoid pulling continuous sutures too tightly: This strangulates wound edges and causes ischemia 1, 2
  • Don't use large bite technique (>10mm from edge): This significantly increases incisional hernia rates compared to small bite technique 1

Material Selection Errors

  • Never use rapidly absorbable sutures for fascial closure: These lose tensile strength too quickly 1
  • Avoid multifilament sutures in contaminated fields: Braided material harbors bacteria 2, 3
  • Don't use tissue adhesives for abdominal or high-tension closures: Unacceptable dehiscence rates 2

Postoperative Management Errors

  • Don't routinely add adhesive steri-strips after suturing: No evidence of benefit for cosmetic outcomes or scar width 1, 4
  • Avoid premature suture removal: Removing before 7-9 days (non-facial) causes dehiscence 1, 4
  • Don't leave any retained suture material in infected wounds: This significantly increases infection risk 4

Special Populations and Scenarios

Emergency Surgery

  • Use slowly absorbable monofilament sutures with 4:1 ratio 1
  • Consider triclosan-coated sutures for contaminated/dirty wounds 1
  • Small bite continuous technique still applies 1

Pediatric Patients

  • Same principles apply: continuous subcuticular technique reduces dehiscence 1
  • Absorbable sutures eliminate need for traumatic removal 1, 2
  • Triclosan-coated sutures show similar SSI reduction as in adults 1

Colorectal Surgery

  • Mandatory use of triclosan-coated Vicryl (not PDS): proven SSI reduction 1
  • Small bite technique with 4:1 ratio 1
  • Slowly absorbable monofilament material 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Wound Closure Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Head Wounds with Hematoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Wound Dehiscence Following Suture Removal

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.