What is the staging and treatment approach for a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with an abdominal mass and no other lymph node involvement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hodgkin Lymphoma with Isolated Abdominal Mass: Staging and Treatment

A patient with Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with only an abdominal mass and no other lymph node involvement should be staged as early-stage disease (Stage I or II) with extranodal involvement, which classifies them as intermediate-stage unfavorable disease requiring 4 cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy. 1

Staging Classification

The presence of an isolated abdominal mass without other lymph node involvement represents extranodal disease, which is a critical risk factor that automatically upgrades the patient from early favorable to intermediate-stage unfavorable disease, regardless of the Ann Arbor stage. 1

According to the staging criteria:

  • Extranodal involvement is specifically listed as a risk factor that moves patients from limited stage to intermediate stage treatment groups 1
  • The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) classification explicitly includes extranodal disease as risk factor B, which determines treatment intensity 1
  • Even if this is technically Stage I disease (single site), the extranodal location mandates more aggressive therapy 1

Required Staging Workup

Before finalizing treatment, complete the following mandatory evaluations:

  • Contrast-enhanced CT scan of neck, chest, and abdomen to confirm no other sites of involvement 2
  • PET-CT for accurate initial staging when available 2, 3
  • Bone marrow biopsy to exclude marrow involvement 1
  • Laboratory assessment: complete blood count, ESR, liver enzymes, alkaline phosphatase, LDH, albumin 1
  • Assessment for B symptoms (fever >38°C, drenching night sweats, unexplained weight loss >10% in 6 months) as these affect risk stratification 1, 3

Standard Treatment Approach

The definitive treatment is 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy followed by 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT). 1

This recommendation is based on:

  • ESMO guidelines specifically designating extranodal disease as an intermediate-stage risk factor requiring 4 cycles of ABVD plus 30 Gy IF-RT 1
  • The GHSG HD11 trial demonstrating tumor control and overall survival exceeding 85-90% at 5 years with this regimen 1
  • EORTC trials H7F and H8F confirming that combined modality therapy substantially reduces relapses compared to chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone 1

ABVD Regimen Components:

  • Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)
  • Bleomycin
  • Vinblastine
  • Dacarbazine Given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles 1

Radiation Therapy Specifications:

  • 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy to the abdominal mass site 1
  • For abdominal wall involvement specifically, ensure adequate radiation field planning with appropriate margins 2
  • Some guidelines suggest 36 Gy for stage I-II disease below the diaphragm, though 30 Gy is more commonly used 2

Alternative Intensive Approach (Age-Dependent)

For patients under 60 years old who are eligible for more intensive treatment, consider:

  • 2 cycles of BEACOPPescalated followed by 2 cycles of ABVD and 30 Gy IF-RT 1
  • This approach showed superior 4-year freedom from treatment failure compared to standard ABVD in the GHSG HD14 trial 1
  • However, long-term toxicity data (especially infertility) are lacking, making this a more controversial choice 1

Critical caveat: BEACOPP should never be used in patients over 60 years due to significantly increased toxicity in this age group 1

Response-Adapted Strategy

Modern practice incorporates interim PET-CT assessment:

  • Perform PET-CT after 2 cycles of chemotherapy to assess early response 2, 3
  • Deauville score 1-3 indicates good response; continue planned therapy 2
  • Deauville score 4-5 indicates poor response; consider treatment intensification or clinical trial enrollment 2
  • This approach is increasingly used but cannot yet be considered standard outside clinical trials as randomized data are still maturing 1

Critical Treatment Modifications

Age-Related Adjustments:

  • Patients over 60 years: Use standard ABVD only; avoid BEACOPP entirely 1
  • Consider discontinuing bleomycin after cycle 2 in older patients due to increased pulmonary toxicity risk 2

Fertility Considerations:

  • Offer fertility preservation counseling before treatment initiation to all patients of reproductive age 2, 3
  • This is particularly important as ABVD has lower gonadotoxicity than BEACOPP, but risks still exist 3

Cardiac Monitoring:

  • Baseline echocardiogram or MUGA scan before anthracycline-containing regimens 2, 4
  • Monitor cardiac function during treatment given doxorubicin cardiotoxicity 2, 4

Post-Treatment Surveillance

After completing therapy:

  • PET-CT at treatment completion to confirm complete remission 2, 3
  • Negative PET-CT after chemotherapy may allow omission of radiotherapy in selected patients, though this remains investigational 1
  • Long-term follow-up for late effects including secondary malignancies and cardiovascular disease 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Do not treat as early favorable disease simply because it appears to be Stage I—extranodal involvement mandates intermediate-stage therapy 1

  2. Do not omit radiotherapy in this setting outside of clinical trials, as combined modality therapy remains standard 1

  3. Do not use chemotherapy-only approaches (4-6 cycles ABVD without radiation) as standard, since prospective randomized data supporting this are very limited for intermediate-stage disease 1

  4. Avoid exploratory laparotomy and splenectomy—these are no longer recommended for staging 1

Prognosis

With appropriate treatment, patients with intermediate-stage Hodgkin lymphoma achieve:

  • Tumor control rates of 85-90% at 5 years 1
  • Overall survival exceeding 90% at 5 years 1
  • The presence of extranodal disease as a single risk factor has a favorable prognosis when treated appropriately 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Abdominal Wall Mass in Hodgkin Lymphoma Nodular Sclerosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Hodgkin Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Hodgkin Lymphoma with Chronic Liver Disease, Acute Kidney Injury, and Cardiomyopathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.