Should a stress test be ordered for a patient with suspected angina and intermediate to high risk of cardiovascular events?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Should You Order a Stress Test for Suspected Angina?

Yes, exercise stress testing should be ordered for patients with suspected angina who have intermediate to high probability of coronary artery disease, as this is essential for risk stratification to determine subsequent coronary events and mortality risk. 1

Patient Selection for Stress Testing

Exercise ECG using the Bruce protocol with Duke treadmill score should be the initial test for patients with suspected chronic stable angina who meet the following criteria: 1, 2

  • Able to exercise adequately
  • Normal or near-normal resting ECG
  • Not taking digoxin
  • Intermediate to high probability of CAD (15-85% pre-test probability) 1

The European Society of Cardiology specifically recommends exercise ECG for patients with pre-test probability of 15-65%, while stress imaging is preferred for those with 66-85% probability or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. 1

When NOT to Order Exercise ECG

Exercise ECG testing is contraindicated or non-diagnostic in the following situations, requiring stress imaging instead: 1

  • Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
  • Electronically paced ventricular rhythm
  • Complete left bundle-branch block
  • More than 1 mm ST depression at rest
  • Patients taking digoxin
  • Unable to exercise adequately

For these patients, pharmacologic stress imaging (echocardiography, SPECT, PET, or CMR) should be used as the initial test. 1

Risk Stratification Using Duke Treadmill Score

The Duke treadmill score provides critical prognostic information that directly impacts mortality: 1, 2

  • Low risk (score ≥5): 4-year survival 99% (0.25% annual mortality) - no angiography needed
  • High risk (score ≤-10): 4-year survival 79% (5% annual mortality) - proceed to angiography

The formula is: Exercise time (minutes) − (5 × ST deviation in mm) − (4 if angina occurs) − (8 if angina causes test termination). 1, 2

This score performs equally well in men and women, though it may be less reliable in patients older than 75 years. 1

Alternative Testing Strategies

For patients with low-intermediate pre-test probability (15-50%), coronary CTA may be considered as an alternative to ischemia testing, provided adequate technology and local expertise are available. 1

Stress imaging (echocardiography or nuclear perfusion) is recommended for: 1, 3

  • Abnormal resting ECG
  • Prior coronary revascularization
  • Inability to exercise adequately
  • Women (though standard exercise ECG remains acceptable as initial test) 1

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not order stress testing in truly low-risk patients (pre-test probability <15%), as this leads to false-positive results and unnecessary downstream testing. 1

Do not repeat stress testing within 3 years in patients without change in clinical status. 4

Do not delay angiography by ordering stress testing in patients with high-risk clinical features (severe symptoms, prior positive stress test, known multivessel disease) - proceed directly to coronary angiography. 4

Exercise stress testing is more useful for ruling out CAD than confirming it - a negative test in appropriate patients has excellent negative predictive value (annual cardiac event rate 0.9%), while positive tests require correlation with clinical context. 1, 5, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Testing for Suspected Angina

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of High-Risk Patients with Severe Reversible Perfusion Defects

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.