How do you use the end-expiratory occlusion test to assess fluid responsiveness in a mechanically ventilated patient with a history of heart failure or coronary artery disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

End-Expiratory Occlusion Test for Fluid Responsiveness Assessment

The end-expiratory occlusion test (EEOT) involves interrupting mechanical ventilation at end-expiration for 15 seconds while monitoring hemodynamic changes, with an increase in cardiac output or pulse pressure ≥5% predicting fluid responsiveness with high accuracy in fully sedated, mechanically ventilated patients. 1

How to Perform the Test

Technical Execution

  • Interrupt the ventilator at end-expiration for 15 seconds while continuously monitoring hemodynamic parameters 2, 1
  • Measure arterial pulse pressure and cardiac output (via pulse contour analysis or echocardiography) at baseline and during the last 5 seconds of the occlusion 1
  • The test acts as an "internal volume challenge" by preventing the cyclic decrease in left ventricular preload that normally occurs during mechanical inspiration 1

Interpretation Thresholds

  • An increase in pulse pressure ≥5% during EEOT predicts fluid responsiveness with 87% sensitivity and 100% specificity 1
  • An increase in cardiac index ≥5% during EEOT predicts fluid responsiveness with 91% sensitivity and 100% specificity 1
  • For echocardiographic assessment, an increase in left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) >4.3% predicts fluid responsiveness with 89.4% sensitivity and 88.9% specificity 2

Critical Limitations in Your Patient Population

Patients with Heart Failure or Coronary Disease

  • The EEOT has been validated primarily in general ICU populations with acute circulatory failure, but specific validation in heart failure patients is limited in the available evidence 2, 1
  • Exercise caution when interpreting results, as altered ventricular compliance in heart failure may affect the hemodynamic response to preload changes

Absolute Contraindications to EEOT

  • Spontaneous breathing activity or patient-triggered ventilator breaths make EEOT unreliable or impossible to perform - in one study, 17 of 34 patients (50%) could not undergo EEOT due to triggering the ventilator during the test 2
  • Patients on pressure support ventilation (PSV) show significantly reduced EEOT accuracy compared to fully controlled ventilation 3
  • During laparotomy or open abdominal surgery, EEOT cannot discriminate responders from non-responders and should not be used 4

When EEOT is Most Reliable

Optimal Clinical Scenarios

  • Fully sedated patients on controlled mechanical ventilation without spontaneous breathing efforts 2, 1
  • Patients with cardiac arrhythmias where respiratory variation indices are unreliable 2, 5
  • Low tidal volume ventilation (<8 mL/kg) where pulse pressure variation loses accuracy 5
  • Low lung compliance conditions where traditional dynamic indices fail 2

Monitoring Requirements

  • Requires real-time cardiac output monitoring via pulse contour analysis (e.g., PiCCO) or transthoracic echocardiography 2, 1
  • Arterial line is mandatory for continuous pulse pressure measurement 1

Comparison to Alternative Tests

  • EEOT performs similarly to passive leg raising (PLR) for predicting fluid responsiveness (AUC 0.957 vs 0.937) but is easier to perform in patients with contraindications to PLR 1
  • In patients with spontaneous breathing on PSV, the SIGH35 maneuver (ventilator-generated sigh at 35 cmH₂O for 4 seconds) outperforms EEOT with an AUC of 0.93 versus 0.67 3
  • The mini-fluid challenge (100 mL bolus over 1 minute with LVOT VTI monitoring) may be preferable when EEOT is not feasible, with comparable accuracy 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not attempt EEOT in patients with any spontaneous breathing activity - this is the most common reason for test failure and false results 2, 3
  • Ensure adequate sedation depth before performing the test to prevent patient-triggered breaths during the 15-second occlusion 1
  • Measure hemodynamic changes during the last 5 seconds of occlusion, not immediately after - this timing is critical for accuracy 1
  • Do not use EEOT during surgical procedures with open abdomen, as changes in intra-abdominal pressure invalidate the test 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.