What is the best approach to managing a diabetic patient's blood glucose levels using the insulin sliding scale method?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sliding Scale Insulin Should Be Avoided as Monotherapy in Hospitalized Patients

The sole use of sliding-scale insulin (SSI) in the inpatient hospital setting is strongly discouraged and should be replaced with scheduled basal-bolus insulin regimens for most patients. 1

Why Sliding Scale Insulin Fails

Sliding scale insulin treats hyperglycemia reactively rather than preventing it, leading to dangerous blood glucose fluctuations that worsen both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. 2 This approach addresses elevated glucose only after it has already occurred, creating a pattern of persistent poor control. 2

Key problems with SSI monotherapy:

  • Only 12% of SSI injections successfully reduced elevated glucose to target range (90-130 mg/dL) in hospitalized patients 3
  • 84% of SSI injections resulted in persistently elevated glucose levels that remained subtherapeutic 3
  • SSI regimens were never adjusted in 81% of patients despite persistent hyperglycemia 3
  • Only 6% of patients achieved good glycemic control over 5 days of SSI therapy 3
  • Documentation and monitoring deficiencies occurred in approximately 30% of anticipated care points 3

The Preferred Alternative: Basal-Bolus Insulin

For hospitalized patients with good nutritional intake, a basal-bolus insulin regimen is the preferred treatment. 1 This approach provides scheduled subcutaneous insulin with basal, nutritional, and correction components. 1

Initial Dosing Algorithm

For insulin-naive patients or those on low insulin doses:

  • Start with total daily dose of 0.3-0.5 units/kg 2
  • Allocate 50% as basal insulin (once daily) 2
  • Allocate 50% as rapid-acting prandial insulin (divided before meals) 2

For patients at higher risk of hypoglycemia (elderly >65 years, renal failure, poor oral intake):

  • Use lower doses of 0.1-0.25 units/kg/day 2, 4

For patients already on high insulin doses at home (≥0.6 units/kg/day):

  • Reduce total daily dose by 20% during hospitalization to prevent hypoglycemia 2, 4

Glycemic Targets

Target glucose range of 140-180 mg/dL for most hospitalized patients. 1, 2 More stringent targets of 110-140 mg/dL may be appropriate for cardiac surgery patients and those with acute ischemic cardiac or neurologic events, if achievable without significant hypoglycemia. 1

When SSI Alone May Be Acceptable (Very Limited Circumstances)

SSI as monotherapy is appropriate only for:

  • Patients without pre-existing diabetes who have mild stress hyperglycemia 5
  • Patients with well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c <7%) on minimal home therapy who develop mild hyperglycemia during hospitalization 2, 5
  • Patients who are NPO with no nutritional replacement and only mild hyperglycemia 2
  • Patients who are new to steroids or tapering steroids 2

For Patients with Poor Oral Intake or NPO Status

A basal-plus-correction insulin regimen is the preferred treatment for patients with poor oral intake or those receiving nothing by mouth. 1 This consists of:

  • Basal insulin at 0.1-0.25 units/kg/day 2, 5
  • Correction doses of rapid-acting insulin before meals or every 6 hours if NPO 5

Critical Care Setting

In the critical care setting, continuous intravenous insulin infusion is the best method for achieving glycemic targets. 1 IV insulin should be administered using validated written or computerized protocols that allow for predefined adjustments. 1

Evidence Supporting Basal-Bolus Over SSI

Randomized trials consistently demonstrate superior outcomes with basal-bolus approaches:

  • 68% of patients receiving basal-bolus insulin achieved mean blood glucose <140 mg/dL versus only 38% with SSI alone 2
  • Basal-bolus approach is associated with reduced complications, including postoperative wound infection and acute renal failure 2
  • Better glycemic control with basal-bolus therapy compared to SSI in patients with type 2 diabetes 2

Important Safety Consideration

Basal-bolus regimens carry a 4-6 times higher risk of hypoglycemia compared to SSI alone (relative risk 5.75 for blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL). 5 This necessitates careful monitoring and appropriate dose adjustments, but the improved glycemic control and reduced complications justify this approach when properly implemented. 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never rely on SSI monotherapy for patients with known diabetes requiring insulin 1, 2
  • Do not continue SSI regimens without modification when control remains poor 2
  • Avoid premixed insulin therapy in hospitals due to unacceptably high rates of hypoglycemia 2
  • Ensure a standardized hospital-wide hypoglycemia treatment protocol is in place to immediately address hypoglycemia 1

Transition Planning

When transitioning from IV insulin to subcutaneous insulin, give subcutaneous insulin 1-2 hours before discontinuing IV therapy. 1 Converting to basal insulin at 60-80% of the daily infusion dose has been shown to be effective. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Insulin Therapy Recommendations for Hospitalized Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Initial Dosing for Lantus (Insulin Glargine) in Patients Requiring Insulin Therapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Insulin Management for Hospitalized Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.