What is the significance of an ultrasensitive Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level less than 0.006?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

An ultrasensitive PSA level less than 0.006 ng/mL is a highly favorable result, indicating no detectable prostate-specific antigen in the bloodstream and suggesting a very low risk of prostate cancer or recurrence. This value is below the threshold of detection for most ultrasensitive PSA assays, and it is consistent with the expected outcome after radical prostatectomy or in men with a very low risk of prostate cancer 1.

Key Points to Consider

  • The ultrasensitive PSA test is designed to detect extremely small amounts of PSA, making it useful for post-prostatectomy monitoring or for assessing the risk of prostate cancer in men with a family history or other risk factors.
  • A PSA level less than 0.006 ng/mL suggests that there is no significant prostate tissue present, which is consistent with the expected outcome after radical prostatectomy 1.
  • Continued monitoring with regular PSA tests is still recommended, typically every 3-6 months for the first few years after surgery, then annually thereafter, to detect any potential recurrence early.
  • Any future rise in PSA, particularly above 0.1-0.2 ng/mL, would warrant further investigation as it could indicate biochemical recurrence 1.

Clinical Implications

The clinical implications of an ultrasensitive PSA level less than 0.006 ng/mL are significant, as it suggests a very low risk of prostate cancer or recurrence. However, it is essential to continue monitoring PSA levels regularly to detect any potential changes or recurrence early. The use of ultrasensitive PSA tests has improved the detection of prostate cancer recurrence, allowing for timely intervention and potentially improving outcomes 1.

From the Research

Ultrasensitive PSA Levels

  • Ultrasensitive PSA levels less than 0.006 ng/mL are considered extremely low and may indicate a favorable prognosis in patients with prostate cancer 2, 3.
  • Studies have shown that patients with undetectable ultrasensitive PSA levels after radical prostatectomy have a lower risk of disease recurrence and improved biochemical recurrence-free survival 2, 4, 3.
  • The use of ultrasensitive PSA assays can detect prostate cancer recurrence earlier than standard PSA assays, but the specificity of detectable ultrasensitive PSA is low 4.

Prognostic Significance

  • Undetectable ultrasensitive PSA nadir after radical prostatectomy is a useful predictor of biochemical recurrence-free survival, along with other factors such as preoperative PSA level, pathologic stage, and pathologic Gleason score 2.
  • Patients with ultralow PSA levels (<0.02 ng/mL) have been shown to have improved oncological outcomes, including overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival, in the context of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with Apalutamide 5.

Clinical Implications

  • The use of ultrasensitive PSA assays may enable earlier detection of cancer recurrence and inform decision-making regarding adjuvant and salvage therapy 4, 3.
  • However, the lack of evidence demonstrating improved survival after early salvage therapy prompted by ultrasensitive PSA surveillance highlights the need for further research in this area 4.

Related Questions

What is the best course of action for a 34-year-old male patient with frequent urination, taking Flomax (tamsulosin), and with a history of spinal injury and normal renal ultrasound results?
Can a 58-year-old patient on prazosin (alpha-blocker) for nightmares be given tamsulosin (alpha-blocker) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)?
Can a 58-year-old patient with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and nightmares, currently incarcerated, be treated with tamsulosin (Flomax) for BPH?
How to manage a 61-year-old male with BPH, difficulty emptying, and nocturia, on Tamsulosin, with normal PSA?
What is the best initial approach for a 33-year-old male patient with urinary frequency, urgency, hesitancy, weak stream, and nocturia, a hernia in the right lower abdominal area, normal Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) level, and normal urinalysis results, who declined a digital rectal examination and is being treated with Flomax (tamsulosin) 0.4 mg QD?
What are the necessary preparations for a patient's coagulation profile prior to neurosurgery?
What is the treatment for first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block in an elderly female with syncope?
What are the treatment options for a Bartholin's (Bartholin gland) cyst?
What antibiotics are effective for treating skin and soft tissue infections, such as abscesses and furuncles, with oxacillin (Oxacillin) sensitivity?
What is the macroscopic (urinalysis) finding for a female with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)?
What is the risk of serotonin syndrome when Linezolid (an antibiotic) is administered with Mirtazapine (an antidepressant)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.