What is the evidence for using saw palmetto to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a male patient over 50?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Saw Palmetto for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Saw palmetto should not be recommended for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH, as the highest quality evidence demonstrates no benefit over placebo for symptom improvement, urinary flow rates, or prostate size reduction. 1

Evidence Against Saw Palmetto Efficacy

The most rigorous placebo-controlled trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that saw palmetto (160 mg twice daily for one year) showed no significant difference from placebo in:

  • American Urological Association Symptom Index scores (mean difference 0.04 points) 1
  • Maximal urinary flow rates (mean difference 0.43 ml/minute) 1
  • Prostate size, residual urinary volume, or quality of life measures 1
  • Serum PSA levels 1

The side effect profile was identical between saw palmetto and placebo groups, confirming safety but also highlighting the lack of therapeutic benefit. 1

Why Earlier Studies Appeared Positive

Earlier meta-analyses and smaller trials suggested potential benefits, but these studies were significantly compromised by:

  • Methodological flaws and inadequate blinding 2
  • Small patient numbers limiting statistical power 2
  • Brief treatment intervals insufficient to assess true efficacy 2
  • Lack of standardized extract formulations across studies 3

The profound placebo effect in BPH treatment trials (well-documented in this population) explains why uncontrolled or poorly controlled studies showed apparent improvement. 4

Guideline-Recommended Treatments Instead

The American Urological Association and European Association of Urology guidelines emphasize that treatments with a strong evidence base for clinical effectiveness should be used 5, which explicitly excludes saw palmetto based on current evidence.

For men over 50 with bothersome LUTS, evidence-based options include:

  • Alpha-blockers (alfuzosin, tamsulosin) as first-line therapy for symptom relief 5
  • 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (finasteride, dutasteride) for men with enlarged prostates to reduce prostate volume and prevent progression 5, 6
  • Combination therapy (alpha-blocker plus 5-ARI) for patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms and prostate enlargement, which addresses both dynamic and static components of obstruction 6

Clinical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not delay evidence-based medical therapy while patients trial saw palmetto, as this allows disease progression and potential complications including acute urinary retention, which increases with age. 7 Men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms require medical therapy with alpha-blockers as first-line treatment, not dietary supplements. 8

The lack of PSA interference with saw palmetto 1 is irrelevant when the agent provides no therapeutic benefit for the underlying condition.

References

Research

Saw palmetto for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

The New England journal of medicine, 2006

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Elderly Males

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Epidemiology and Clinical Significance of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Dietary Modifications for Managing BPH Symptoms

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.