Does metformin reduce all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, and how does its efficacy compare to Sodium-Glucose Linked Transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Metformin and All-Cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes

Metformin reduces all-cause mortality by 36% compared to conventional therapy and should be started as first-line therapy in all patients with type 2 diabetes unless contraindicated, but SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists demonstrate superior mortality reduction with high-certainty evidence and should be added early, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease. 1, 2

Metformin's Mortality Benefit

Metformin demonstrates clear mortality reduction based on the landmark UKPDS 34 trial:

  • Reduces all-cause mortality by 36% (relative risk reduction 9% to 55%, P = 0.011) compared to conventional therapy alone 1
  • On extended 17-year follow-up, maintained a 27% reduction in all-cause mortality (7.2 deaths per 1000 patient-years, P = 0.002) 1
  • Reduces cardiovascular mortality by 39% and myocardial infarction by 39% compared to conventional therapy 3
  • Observational data shows patients on metformin had longer survival than matched non-diabetic controls 1

The evidence quality requires context: While metformin's mortality benefit is well-established in clinical practice, the American College of Physicians rates this as low-quality evidence due to methodological limitations of the UKPDS trial and inconsistent results across observational studies 2. However, a 2020 meta-analysis of 26 observational studies including 815,839 patients confirmed metformin's association with significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.74,95% CI 0.68-0.81) 4.

SGLT-2 Inhibitors: Superior Mortality Evidence

SGLT-2 inhibitors demonstrate the strongest mortality reduction with high-certainty evidence:

  • Reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care with high-certainty evidence (the strongest evidence grade available) 1, 5
  • The American College of Physicians provides a strong recommendation for SGLT-2 inhibitors as preferred second-line therapy after metformin 5
  • Reduce major adverse cardiovascular events with moderate to high certainty 1
  • Reduce heart failure hospitalizations with high certainty 1
  • Reduce progression of chronic kidney disease with high certainty 1

Clinical prioritization for SGLT-2 inhibitors: The American Heart Association recommends prioritizing SGLT-2 inhibitors specifically in patients with congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or when cardiovascular mortality reduction is the primary goal 1. These agents should be added to metformin early rather than waiting for glycemic failure 1, 5.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Alternative with Strong Evidence

GLP-1 receptor agonists also reduce all-cause mortality with high-certainty evidence:

  • Reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care with high-certainty evidence 1, 2
  • Reduce all-cause mortality compared to DPP-4 inhibitors with moderate certainty 1
  • Reduce major adverse cardiovascular events with moderate to high certainty 1
  • Reduce stroke with high certainty 1

Clinical prioritization for GLP-1 agonists: The American Diabetes Association recommends prioritizing GLP-1 agonists specifically in patients with increased stroke risk or when weight loss is an important treatment goal 1. These agents are preferred over insulin when greater glucose lowering is needed beyond oral agents 3.

Direct Comparison: Metformin vs. SGLT-2 vs. GLP-1

The hierarchy of evidence quality for mortality reduction:

  1. SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists: High-certainty evidence from multiple cardiovascular outcomes trials 1, 2
  2. Metformin: Low to moderate-quality evidence primarily from UKPDS and observational studies 2

However, this does not diminish metformin's role: Metformin remains the recommended first-line agent due to its efficacy, safety profile, weight neutrality, lack of hypoglycemia risk, and low cost 3. The key is early addition of SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists to metformin rather than sequential monotherapy failure 1, 5.

Practical Treatment Algorithm

For newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes:

  • Start metformin immediately at diagnosis unless contraindicated (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) 3
  • Simultaneously add an SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist if the patient has established cardiovascular disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, or high cardiovascular risk 3, 1
  • Do not wait for metformin monotherapy to fail before adding these agents 1, 5

For patients with established cardiovascular disease or heart failure:

  • SGLT-2 inhibitors are preferred due to proven heart failure hospitalization reduction 1
  • Add to metformin regardless of A1C level 3

For patients with high stroke risk or obesity:

  • GLP-1 agonists are preferred due to stroke reduction and weight loss benefits 1
  • Add to metformin regardless of A1C level 3

Critical Safety Considerations

When combining these agents, hypoglycemia risk management is essential:

  • When SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists achieve adequate glycemic control, reduce or discontinue sulfonylureas or long-acting insulins to minimize severe hypoglycemia risk 1
  • Metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 agonists do not cause hypoglycemia as monotherapy 3, 1
  • Early addition of metformin to sulfonylureas resulted in increased risk for diabetes-related death (P = 0.039) compared with sulfonylureas alone 1

Metformin-specific monitoring:

  • Monitor vitamin B12 levels periodically, as metformin increases risk of deficiency and worsening neuropathy symptoms 3
  • Monitor renal function; metformin is safe with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² but requires caution with eGFR 30-45 mL/min/1.73 m² 3
  • Discontinue in acute conditions associated with lactic acidosis risk (cardiogenic shock, distributive shock) 3

SGLT-2 inhibitor-specific monitoring:

  • Canagliflozin carries increased risk of lower-limb amputation (HR 1.97,95% CI 1.41-2.75); monitor for infection or ulcers and discontinue if these occur 1
  • Monitor for genital mycotic infections and volume depletion 3

Agents That Do NOT Reduce Mortality

Avoid these agents when mortality reduction is the goal:

  • DPP-4 inhibitors: Do not reduce all-cause mortality with low to high certainty evidence 1. The American College of Physicians strongly recommends against adding DPP-4 inhibitors to metformin for mortality reduction 1, 5
  • Insulin: Does not reduce all-cause mortality compared to usual care with low to high certainty evidence 1
  • Sulfonylureas: The UKPDS 33 trial showed only a 6% relative reduction in all-cause mortality that was not statistically significant (P = 0.44) 1
  • Intensive glycemic control with sulfonylureas or insulin: The VADT trial showed no mortality reduction (HR 1.05,95% CI 0.89-1.25) 1

References

Guideline

Diabetes Interventions That Reduce All-Cause Mortality

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Metformin and Mortality Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The right place for metformin today.

Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2020

Guideline

Empagliflozin as Add-On Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.