What is the first-line chemotherapy regimen for a patient with metastatic gallbladder cancer to the liver?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Gallbladder Cancer to the Liver

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with durvalumab is the current standard of care for first-line treatment of metastatic gallbladder cancer to the liver, providing a median overall survival of 12.9 months compared to 11.3 months with chemotherapy alone (HR 0.76). 1, 2

Primary Treatment Regimen

The triplet combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab should be offered to all eligible patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer. 1, 2

  • Dosing schedule: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² plus cisplatin 25-30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, combined with durvalumab 1, 2
  • This regimen demonstrated superiority in the TOPAZ-1 trial with improved overall survival (HR 0.76,95% CI 0.64-0.91), response rates, and progression-free survival 1
  • The addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab to chemotherapy was approved by both FDA and EMA based on this evidence 1

Alternative First-Line Option

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus pembrolizumab represents an FDA/EMA-approved alternative, though the benefit in gallbladder cancer specifically was less pronounced than in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR 0.99 for extrahepatic/gallbladder subgroup) 1, 2

  • The Keynote-966 trial showed overall benefit across biliary tract cancers (HR 0.83,95% CI 0.72-0.95) 1
  • This may be considered when durvalumab is unavailable or contraindicated 1, 2

Patient Selection Criteria

Only patients with ECOG performance status 0-1 (or 0-2 after biliary drainage optimization) should receive this intensive triplet therapy. 3, 2

  • Patients with ECOG PS >2 should receive best supportive care only, as they derive no survival benefit and experience increased toxicity 3, 2
  • Adequate organ function is required, particularly creatinine clearance for cisplatin-based therapy 3
  • Biliary drainage must be optimized before chemotherapy initiation in jaundiced patients 3, 4

For Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients

When cisplatin is contraindicated due to renal impairment (GFR <60 mL/min), cardiac disease, or other comorbidities, carboplatin may be substituted, though with reduced efficacy 1, 5

  • Gemcitabine plus carboplatin showed response rates of 42% in medically unfit patients, dropping to 26% in those with renal impairment 1
  • Oxaliplatin may also be substituted for cisplatin when there is concern about renal function 1
  • For very frail patients, gemcitabine monotherapy may be preferred 1

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

Continue treatment for a maximum of 6 cycles (approximately 6 months) depending on response and tolerance. 1, 5

  • Re-evaluate patients after 2-3 cycles of chemotherapy 5
  • Continue for 2 additional cycles in patients with response or stable disease 5
  • Change treatment if no response is seen after 2 cycles or significant toxicity develops 5
  • There is insufficient evidence to recommend continuous treatment beyond 6 months 1

Expected Outcomes

With modern first-line therapy, expect a median overall survival of 12.9 months and median progression-free survival of 5-6 months. 1, 2

  • Disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) is approximately 60-85% 6, 7, 8
  • Response rates range from 30-68% depending on the specific regimen and patient population 6, 7, 8
  • Without treatment, median survival is only 3.9 months 2, 5

Prognostic Factors Specific to Liver Metastases

Liver metastases are an independent negative prognostic factor, associated with shorter overall survival (HR 1.63). 8

  • Other poor prognostic factors include neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3 (HR 1.65), CEA ≥5 ng/mL (HR 1.50), and CA19-9 ≥500 U/mL (HR 1.59) 8
  • Performance status remains the single most important prognostic factor determining treatment benefit 3, 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not delay chemotherapy in eligible patients waiting for further disease progression, as early initiation correlates with improved outcomes 3, 5

Do not proceed with chemotherapy before optimizing biliary drainage in jaundiced patients, as this increases toxicity and reduces efficacy 3, 4

Do not treat patients with ECOG PS >2, as they show no survival benefit and experience increased toxicity 3, 2

For patients with moderately elevated bilirubin due to endoluminal disease despite optimal stenting, cisplatin-gemcitabine can still be used safely with results similar to those with normal bilirubin, particularly in patients with luminal disease rather than extensive liver metastases 1, 4

Emerging Data

The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GCNP) has shown promising results in phase II trials, with overall response rates of 67.6% and median event-free survival of 9.92 months 7

  • This triplet is being evaluated in the phase III SWOG-1815 study compared to cisplatin-gemcitabine 1
  • Until phase III data are available, this remains investigational 1, 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Metastatic Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Chemotherapy Eligibility Criteria for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Gallbladder Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.