What is the clinical significance of a positive Mcburney sign in a patient with abdominal pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

McBurney Sign in Abdominal Pain

McBurney sign—direct tenderness at McBurney's point (located one-third the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus)—is a useful but insufficient clinical finding for diagnosing appendicitis that must be confirmed with imaging, specifically CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast, which has 85.7-100% sensitivity and 94.8-100% specificity. 1, 2

Clinical Significance and Limitations

What McBurney Sign Indicates

  • McBurney's point represents the typical anatomical location of the appendix, and tenderness at this site suggests peritoneal irritation from an inflamed appendix 1
  • The sign was described by Charles McBurney in 1891 as the point of maximal tenderness in acute appendicitis, located "between an inch and a half and two inches from the anterior spinous process of the ilium on a straight line drawn from that process to the umbilicus" 3, 4
  • A positive McBurney sign remains a key finding on abdominal examination when evaluating patients with right lower quadrant pain 4

Critical Limitations You Must Understand

  • Only 35% of appendix bases actually lie within 5 cm of McBurney's point, and 15% are more than 10 cm distant from this landmark 5
  • Less than half of all patients with confirmed appendicitis have tenderness maximal over McBurney's point 5
  • The classic presentation (including McBurney point tenderness, fever, and leukocytosis) is present in only approximately 50% of appendicitis cases 6, 1
  • McBurney's point tenderness is over-emphasized as the key to diagnosis, leading to missed cases when clinicians rely too heavily on this single finding 7

Diagnostic Algorithm When McBurney Sign is Present

Immediate Assessment Required

  • Do not proceed to surgery based on clinical findings alone—negative appendectomy rates reach 14.7-25% without preoperative imaging 6
  • Assess for complete clinical picture: periumbilical pain migrating to right lower quadrant, anorexia/nausea/vomiting, fever (though absent in ~50% of cases), and leukocytosis 1, 6
  • Examine for additional peritoneal signs: guarding, rigidity, rebound tenderness, or positive Rovsing sign (left lower quadrant palpation causing right lower quadrant pain) 1

Mandatory Imaging Confirmation

  • Order CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast without enteral contrast as the definitive next step for adolescents and adults with positive McBurney sign 6, 2, 1
  • CT achieves 90-100% sensitivity and 94.8-100% specificity, and reduces negative appendectomy rates to 1.7-7.7% 6, 2
  • CT identifies alternative diagnoses in 23-45% of patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain and classic symptoms, fundamentally changing management 6, 2

Alternative Imaging Approaches

  • In children, start with ultrasound to avoid radiation exposure, then proceed to CT if ultrasound is nondiagnostic or equivocal 6
  • Staged ultrasound followed by CT achieves 99% sensitivity and 91% specificity 6
  • In pregnant patients, use MRI which demonstrates 96% sensitivity and specificity 2, 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Rely on Clinical Examination Alone

  • Clinical determination of appendicitis is notoriously poor—even experienced clinicians miss the diagnosis when relying solely on physical examination 6
  • The absence of fever does not exclude appendicitis, as fever is absent in approximately 50% of confirmed cases 6
  • Normal WBC count significantly reduces probability but does not exclude appendicitis (negative likelihood ratio 0.25) 6

Recognize Atypical Presentations

  • Atypical presentations occur in approximately 50% of patients, requiring a lower threshold for imaging 1
  • Female patients of childbearing age have more atypical presentations and lower diagnostic accuracy on ultrasound (false-positive rate 35.5% vs 6.2% in men) 1
  • Elderly patients frequently lack the classic triad and present with signs of peritonitis including abdominal distension, generalized tenderness, and palpable mass 1
  • Obesity significantly reduces ultrasound accuracy, with false diagnosis rates of 34.4% in obese men versus 6.2% in non-obese men 1

Do Not Delay Imaging

  • NSAIDs and pain medications can mask evolving symptoms and delay diagnosis 6
  • If symptoms persist or worsen during observation, proceed immediately to CT imaging 6
  • Delayed presentation increases perforation risk, particularly in elderly patients who typically present later 1

Alternative Examination Techniques

  • The "pinch-an-inch" test can be used as a less uncomfortable alternative to rebound tenderness: grasp and elevate a fold of abdominal skin over McBurney's point, then allow it to recoil briskly—pain when the skin strikes the peritoneum indicates peritonitis 8
  • Obturator sign (pain with internal rotation of the flexed hip) suggests pelvic appendix location 1

When to Discharge vs. Admit

Low-Risk Patients Without Classic Findings

  • Discharge with mandatory 24-hour follow-up if patient has low clinical suspicion (mild symptoms, no peritoneal signs, normal vital signs) 6, 1
  • Provide clear return precautions for worsening pain, fever, vomiting, or development of peritoneal signs 6
  • If symptoms persist or worsen at follow-up, proceed to imaging (ultrasound first-line in pediatrics, CT in adults) 6

High-Risk or Positive Imaging

  • Surgical consultation and antimicrobial therapy if appendicitis is confirmed on imaging 6
  • Immediate assessment in emergency department for severe pain, persistent vomiting, fever, or worsening symptoms 6

References

Guideline

Appendicitis Diagnosis Using Rovsing Sign

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[Charles McBurney's point].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2010

Research

Charles McBurney: McBurney's point.

The Journal of emergency medicine, 2012

Guideline

Management of Suspected Appendicitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Pinch-an-inch test for appendicitis.

Southern medical journal, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.